Public Subsidies and the Role of Suburbanization in Urban Economic Development: A Reply to Timothy Bates

Abstract

This article commends Professor Bates’s analysis of the Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Company (MESBIC) program, acknowledging its important object lessons: that size, excellent management talent, and effective cost and risk containment are critical to MESBIC success. I challenge, however, Professor Bates’s implicit indictment of the Clinton administration’s signature community development initiatives. The article argues that such community development investments are justified and should be understood as a small but important component of an overall strategy to connect economically marginal communities and the citizens who live there to the regional economy. More important, this article argues that the next wave of community development strategies sponsored by federal and state government ought to squarely address issues of regional inequity, avoiding subsidization of rapid suburbanization in a manner that exacerbates interjurisdictional disparities of tax-base wealth and of citizen opportunity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates, T. (2000). Financing the development of urban minority communities: Lessons of history. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 227-242.

Burchell, R. , Shad, N. , Listokin, D. , & Phillips, H. (1998). The costs of sprawl-revisited. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Cashin, S. (in press). Localism, self-interest, and the tyranny of the favored quarter: Addressing the barriers to new regionalism. Georgetown Law Journal.

Frug, G. (1996). The geography of community. Stanford Law Review, 48, 1047-1108.

Jackson, K. (1985). The crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kantor, P. (1993). The dependent city revisited. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Lemann, N. (1994, January 9). The myth of community development. New York Times Magazine, p. 52.

Moe, R. , & Wilkie, C. (1997). Changing places: Rebuilding community in the age of sprawl. New York: Henry Holt.

Nowak, J. (1997). Neighborhood initiative and the regional economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 3-10.

10.

Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress . (1995). The technological reshaping of metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

11.

Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

12.

Rusk, D. (1993). Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

13.

Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

14.

Surface Transportation Policy Project . (1996). Getting a fair share: An analysis of federal transportation spending. Washington, DC: Author.

15.

U.S. General Accounting Office . (1999). Community development: Extent of federal influence on “urban sprawl” is unclear. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.