State-local tax policies to encourage growth and development have been roundly criticized as detrimental to social welfare. In response, recent proposals have included delimiting the ability of states and localities to fashion tax policies. Not only are such proposals unworkable, but they fail to harness the creative energy and ideas of development practitioners because they act competitively to foster growth and development. The authors propose an alternative basis on which to fashion state-local taxation of business—that is, the so-called benefit principle—which aligns business taxes with costs of government services received by business entities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations . (1978). The Michigan single business tax. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Barlow, R. , & Connor, J. S., Jr. (1982). The single business tax. In H. E. Brazer (Ed.), Michigan’s fiscal and economic structure (pp. 673-719). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Bartik, T. (1991a). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: The Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Bartik, T. J. (1991b). The effects of property taxes and other local public policies on the intrametropolitan pattern of business location. In H. W. Herzog, Jr., & A. M. Schlottman (Eds.), Industry location and public policy (pp. 57-82). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
5.
Boston Municipal Research Bureau . (1998). Survey of selected business improvement districts. Boston: Author.
6.
Burchell, R. W. , & Listokin, D. (1993). The development impact assessment handbook and model. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
7.
Burstein, M. L. , & Rolnick, A. J. (1996, June). The economic war among the states. In The Region. Minneapolis, MN: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
8.
Calzonetti, F. J. , & Walker, R. T. (1991). Factors affecting industrial location decisions. In H. W. Herzog, Jr., & A. M. Schlottman (Eds.), Industry location and public policy (pp. 221-240). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
9.
DeBoer, L. (1992, October 13). Shares of major Indiana taxes paid by businesses and individuals, 1991. Indianapolis, IN: Commission on State Tax and Financing Policy.
10.
Edison Electric Institute . (1996). Statistical yearbook of the electric utility industry (1995 ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
11.
Einsweiler, R. C. , & Miness, D. (1992). Vol. 1: Managing community growth and change in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
12.
Fischel, W. (1975). Fiscal and environmental considerations in the location of firms in suburban communities. In E. Mills & W. Oates (Eds.), Fiscal zoning and land use controls (pp. 119-174). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
Fisher, R. C. (1997, March/April). The effects of state and local services on economic development. New England Economic Review, pp. 53-66.
14.
Gramlich, E. M. (1997). Subnational fiscal policy. In J. M. Quigley (Ed.), Perspectives on local public finance and fiscal policy (Vol. 3, pp. 3-27). Greenwich, CT: J.A.I. Press.
15.
Harberger, A. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 215-240.
16.
Houston, L. (1997). Business improvement districts. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
17.
Kenyon, D. A. (1996). A new state VAT? Lessons from New Hampshire. National Tax Journal, 49(3), 381-399.
18.
Kitchen, H. M. , & Slack, E. (1993). Business property taxation (Discussion Paper Series 93-24). Kingston, Canada: Queen’s University, Government and Competitiveness School of Public Policy.
19.
McClure, C. E. (1978). Taxation, substitution and industrial location. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 112-132.
20.
Mieszkowski, P. (1972). The property tax: An excise tax or a profits tax?Journal of Public Economics, 1, 73-96.
21.
Oakland, W. H. (1988). Business taxation in Louisiana: An appraisal. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Louisiana’s fiscal alternatives (pp. 159-187). New Orleans: Louisiana State University Press.
22.
Oakland, W. , & Testa, W. A. (1996, January/February). State-local taxation and the benefit principle. In Economic perspectives (pp. 2-19). Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
23.
Property/casualty insurance facts. (1996). New York: Insurance Information Institute.
24.
Ring, R. J. (1989). The proportion of consumers’ and producers’ goods in the general sales tax. National Tax Journal, 42(2), 167-179.
25.
Snyder, T. P. , & Stegman, M. A. (1986). Paying for growth (p. 119). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
26.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Governments Division . (1997). State and local government finance estimates, by state. Retrieved May 15, 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.census.gov/govs/www/estimate.html
