Rural communities are entering the telecommunications business to leverage telecommunications infrastructure for economic development. They face challenges in obtaining advanced infrastructure comparable to that in urban areas as well as in using it as an economic development tool. This article examines the process of obtaining advanced telecommunications infrastructure and the extent to which economic development outcomes followed through a case study of rural LaGrange, Georgia. The experiences of LaGrange suggest that an initial fiscally conservative investment approach to entering into telecommunications service provision as a rural municipality appears to be sound, given supportive public policies, municipality experience in the public utilities business, and private sector partnerships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Calvin, J. (1999, January). Georgia’s home rule under attack: Gap widens between state’s haves and have-nots. Retrieved February 25, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.gmanet.com/features/telecomm/index.shtml.
2.
City of LaGrange, Georgia . (1992). New jobs created in manufacturing & service and plant closings, 1980-1990. LaGrange, GA: Author.
3.
Crihfield, J. , & Panggabean, M. (1995). Is public infrastructure productive? A metropolitan perspective using new capital stock estimates. Studies in Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(5), 605-680.
4.
Egan, B. (1996, October 28). Improving rural telecommunications infrastructure. Paper presented at the TVA Rural Studies rural telecommunications workshop, Lexington, KY.
5.
Ehrlich, J. (1991). Telecommunications and rural development: An essential tool for reversing rural America’s economic downfall. Washington, DC: Sunbelt Institute.
6.
Federal Engineering, Inc. (1993). Phased telecom development in LaGrange. LaGrange, GA: Author.
7.
Fox W. , & Mayo, J. (1992). State-level telecommunications policy in the post-divestiture era. In Survey of business (pp. 10-19). Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, College of Business.
8.
Healey, J. (1997, August). Telecommunications: The people’s wires. Governing, pp. 34-38.
9.
Holtz-Eakin, D. , & Schwartz, A. (1995). Infrastructure in a structural model of economic growth. Studies in Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(2), 131-151.
10.
Hundt, R. E. (1996, July 18). Statement on implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance, Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Federal Communication Commission.
11.
Irving, L. E. (1997, October 21). Equipping rural Americans with the tools to compete successfully in the new economy. Paper presented at Rural Tele Con, Aspen, CO.
12.
Malecki, E. (1996, October 28). Telecommunications technology and American rural development in the 21st century. Paper presented at the TVA Rural Studies rural telecommunications workshop, Lexington, KY.
13.
McConnaughey, J. , & Lader, W. (1997). Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
14.
Municipal Electric Agency . (1992). Manufacturing vs. services as percentage of total state employment. Atlanta, GA: Author.
15.
Nix, C. (1998, January 13). Little risk to taxpayer. LaGrange Daily News. Retrieved February 25, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.lagrangenews.com/News/0113.html.
16.
Parker, E. (1996, October 28). Telecommunications and rural development: Threats and opportunities. Paper presented at the TVA Rural Studies rural telecommunications workshop, Lexington, KY.
17.
Read, W. , & Youtie, J. (1996). Telecommunications strategy for economic development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Rowley, T. , & Porterfield, S. (1993). Can telecommunications help rural areas overcome obstacles to development?Rural Development Perspectives, 8(2), 2-6.
19.
Schools create tech prep partnership . (1993, March 1). LaGrange Daily News, pp. 1, 1B.
