Cluster Case Studies: The Marriage of Quantitative and Qualitative Information for Action

Abstract

This article highlights the use of qualitative data as methodological tools in cluster analysis, following the identification of the cluster through a quantitative analysis. The qualitative methodological tools surveyed include a detailed interview protocol, an interview analysis, a cluster map to describe the cluster structure, and a briefing paper. A cluster map is a visual schematic that describes the different components of a cluster and how the components relate to each other. The cluster map illustrates the cluster’s structure, shapes the way in which the cluster is perceived, and can guide new economic development strategies that take into account the synergies between the cluster’s different components. The article reviews several types of cluster maps and recommends an improved version that combines elements from several of the maps.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austrian, Z. (1998, June). The insurance cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Urban Center.

Bergman, E. , Feser, E. , & Sweeney, S. (1996, March). Targeting North Carolina manufacturing: Understanding the state’s economy through industrial cluster analysis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Institute for Economic Development.

Brennan, J. (1998, June). The metalworking cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Urban Center.

Economic Competitiveness Group, DRI/McGraw-Hill . (1996a, June). America’s clusters: Building industry clusters. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Association.

Economic Competitiveness Group, DRI/McGraw-Hill , with Information Design Associates . (1996b, August). America’s clusters: Experiences and lessons learned. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration.

Fagan, J. (1998, June). The instruments and controls cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Urban Center.

Hill, E. , & Brennan, J. (2000). A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 65-96.

Kaufman, A. , Gittell, R. , Merenda, M. , Naumes, W. , & Wood, C. (1994). Porter’s model for geographic competitive advantage: The case of New Hampshire. Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 43-66.

Keeney, D. , & Swirski, A. (1998, June). The chemicals cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Urban Center.

10.

Kleinhenz, J. , Robey, J. , & Paparella, M. (1998, June). The automotive cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Greater Cleveland Growth Association, Research Department.

11.

Luk, S. (1998, June). The plastics cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Palo Alto, CA: Collaborative Economics Inc.

12.

Porter, M. (1997, September). Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments, and institutions (working paper). Boston: Harvard Business School.

13.

Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.

14.

Waits, M. J. (1998, June). The biotechnology cluster in northeast Ohio: A briefing paper (working paper). Palo Alto, CA: Collaborative Economics Inc.

15.

Waits, M. J. , & Howard, G. (1996). Industry clusters. Economic Development Commentary, 20(3), 5-11.