Male sport settings and the actors involved in them often are quite misogynist in orientation. For feminist researchers who hope to undertake fieldwork, problems in entering and staying in such contexts may appear so exorbitant that they may preclude their participation in these types of settings. Drawing upon his experiences of undertaking feminist fieldwork in the overtly misogynist setting of the rugby pitch (playing field), the author explores some of the issues and problems associated with research in incompatible settings, offers some specific strategies for dealing with them, and notes the promise of this type of data collection. Ultimately, if one wants to maintain any semblance of a centered perspective and sanity, she or he must temporarily become a sylph—a being without a soul—to undertake fieldwork in these types of research environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P. A.
, and P. Adler. 1987. Membership roles in field research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Cancian, F. M.1992. Feminist science: Methodologies that challenge inequality.Gender & Society6:623-642.
3.
Collins, P. H.
1991a. Black feminist thought: Knowledge consciousness and the politics of empowerment.New York: Routledge.
4.
Collins, P. H.
1991b. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. In Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research, edited by J. A. Cook and M. M. Fonow, 35-59. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5.
Connell, R. W.
1995. Masculinities.Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Cook, J. A.
, and M. M. Fonow. 1986. Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research.Sociological Inquiry54:2-29.
7.
Cook, J. A.
, and M. M. Fonow. 1991. Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Curry, T. J.1991. Fraternal bonding in the locker room: A profeminist analysis of talk about competition and women.Sociology of Sport8:119-135.
9.
Daniels, A. K.1983. Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork.Qualitative Sociology6:195-214.
10.
Danzinger, S. K.1979. On doctor watching: Fieldwork in medical settings.Urban Life7:513-532.
11.
Dundes, A.
1980. Into the endzone: A psychoanalytical consideration of American football. In Interpreting folklore, edited by A. Dundes, 199-210. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12.
Easterday, L.
, D. Papademas, L. Schorr, and C. Valentine. 1977. The making of a female researcher: Role problems in field work.Urban Life6:333-348.
13.
Eisler, R.
1987. The chalice and the blade: Our history, our future.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
14.
Eisler, R.
1996. Sacred pleasure: Sex, myth and the politics of the body—New paths to power and love.San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
15.
Gurney, J. N.1985. Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male dominated setting.Qualitative Sociology8:42-62.
16.
Haraway, D.1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies14:575-599.
17.
Hawkesworth, M. E.1989. Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth.Signs14:533-557.
18.
Johnson, S.
1987. Going out of our minds: The metaphysics of liberation.Freedom, CA: Crossing.
19.
Kleinman, S.
, and M. A. Copp. 1993. Emotion in fieldwork.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Lee, R. M.
1995. Dangerous fieldwork.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Lorber, J.
1994. Paradoxes of gender.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Lorde, A.
1983. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In The bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color, edited by C. Morraga and G. Anzaldua, 98-101. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color.
23.
Martin, S. E.1978. Sexual politics in the workplace: The interactional world of policewomen.Symbolic Interaction1:44-60.
24.
Messner, M. A.1990. Boyhood, organized sports, and the construction of masculinities.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18:416-444.
25.
Mitchel, R. G.
1993. Secrecy in fieldwork.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Peneff, J.1985. Fieldwork in Algeria.Qualitative Sociology8:65-78.
27.
Peshkin, A.1984. Odd man out: The participant observer in an absolutist setting.Sociology of Education57:254-264.
28.
Reinharz, S.
1992. Feminist methods in social research.New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Sabo, D.
1989. Pigskin, patriarchy and pain. In Men's lives, edited by M. S. Kimmel and M. A. Messner, 184-186. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Sabo, D. F.
, and J. Panepinto. 1990. Football ritual and the social reproduction of masculinity. In Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives, edited by M. A. Messner and D. F. Sabo, 115-126. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
31.
Schacht, S. P.1996a. Misogyny on and off the “pitch”: The gendered world of male rugby players.Gender & Society10:550-565.
32.
Schacht, S. P.
1996b. Paris is burning: How society's stratification systems make drag queens of us all. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York.
33.
Schacht, S. P.
, and P. H. Atchison. 1993. Heterosexual instrumentalism: Past and future directions. In Heterosexuality: A feminism and psychology reader, edited by S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger, 120-135. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Schacht, S. P.
, and D. Ewing. 1997. The many paths of feminism: Can men travel any of them?Journal of Gender Studies6:159-176.
35.
Stanley, L.
, and S. Wise. 1993. Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology.New York: Routledge.
36.
Stoltenberg, J.
1996. How power makes men: The grammar of gender identity. Unpublished manuscript.
37.
Thorne, B.1979. Political activist as a participant observer: Conflicts of commitment in a study of the draft resistance movement of the 1960's.Symbolic Interaction2:73-88.
38.
Warren, C.A.B.
1988. Gender issues in field research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Warren, C.A.B.
, and P. K. Rasmussen. 1977. Sex and gender in field research.Urban Life6:349-369.
40.
Wax, R. H.1979. Gender and age in fieldwork and fieldwork education: No good thing is done by man alone.Social Problems26:509-522.
41.
Wolf, D. L.
1996. Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork.Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Young, I.1988. Five faces of oppression.Philosophical Forum19:270-290.
