This article addresses the processes of change that were put into motion by the Second Vatican Council. Our focus is on the central liturgical Vatican II principle of the “full, active, conscious participation of the faithful.” This tenet changed the terms through which community was to be enacted. Our inquiry focuses on the consequences of this policy, and we approach our concern with the Weberian and Pragmatist assumptions that all human affairs must be worked out in processes of social action. We specifically follow Hall and Estes and Edmonds in conceptualizing policy as a set of intentions. We present observational and interview data from a local parish that show how parish members and officials interpreted the policy of active participation as it pertained to the ritual celebration of first holy communion. We then discuss issues of segmentation and the changing church in contemporary America.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P.
, and P. Adler. 1987. Membership roles in field research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Blumer, H.1947. Sociological theory in industrial relations.American Sociological Review12:271-278.
3.
Blumer, H.
1962. Society as symbolic interaction. In Human behavior and social processes, edited by A. Rose, 179-192. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4.
Blumer, H.
1990. Industrialization as an agent of social change: A critical analysis.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
5.
Bugnini, A.
1990. The reform of the liturgy 1948-1975.Collegeville, IN: Liturgical Press.
6.
Cavanaugh, M. B.1991. The whole place is holy.Environment and Art, June, 26-29.
7.
Crowley-Horak, E.1994. Lift up your hearts.Liturgy90, Feb./Mar., 10-13.
8.
Davis, F.1959. The cabdriver and his fare: Facets of a fleeting relationship.American Journal of Sociology65:158-165.
9.
Denzin, N.1977. Notes on the criminogenic hypothesis: A case study of the American liquor industry.American Sociological Review42:905-920.
10.
Dornfeld, Tim.1994. Rethinking children's liturgy of the word.Modern Liturgy21 (2): 14-16.
11.
Douglas, M.
1970. Natural symbols. Explorations in cosmology.New York: Vintage.
12.
Dunlap, J.1995. First Communion: A teachable moment.Church, Spring, 43-46.
13.
Ebaugh, H. R.1991. The revitalization movement in the Catholic Church: The institutional dilemma of power.Sociological Analysis52:1-12.
14.
Estes, C.
, and Edmonds, B.1981. Symbolic interaction and social policy analysis.Symbolic Interaction4:75-86.
15.
Farberman, H.1975. A criminogenic market structure: The automobile industry.Sociological Quarterly16:438-457.
16.
Faegin, J.
, A. Orum, and G. Sjoberg, eds. 1991. A case for the case study.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
17.
Fine, G. A.
, and S. Kleinman.1983. Network and meaning: An interactionist approach to structure.Symbolic Interaction6:97-110.
18.
Fischer, M.
, and M. Dirsmith.1995. Strategy, technology, and social processes within professional cultures: A negotiated order, ethnographic perspective.Symbolic Interaction18:381-412.
19.
Flanagan, K.
1991. Sociology and liturgy: Re-presentations of the holy.New York: St. Martin's.
20.
Flannery, A.O.P.
, ed. 1987. Constitution on the sacred liturgy. In Vatican II: The conciliar and post conciliar documents.Study edition, 1-37. New York: Costello.
21.
Geist, P.
, and Hardesty, M. 1992. Negotiating the crisis: DRG's and the transformation of hospitals.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Gensler, Gael.1990. The rite of Christian initiation adapted for children: First steps.Catechumenate, May, 15-19.
23.
Gubrium, J.
, and J. Holstein.1994. Grounding the postmodern self.The Sociological Quarterly35:685-703.
24.
Hall, P. M.1995. The consequences of qualitative analysis for sociological theory: Beyond the micro level.The Sociological Quarterly36:397-423.
25.
Hammersley, M.
, and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles and practice.London: Tavistock.
26.
Hargrove, B.1988. Religion, development, and changing paradigms.Sociological Analysis49:S33-48.
27.
Hornsby-Smith, M. P.
1989. The changing parish: A study of parishes, priests, and parishioners after Vatican II.London: Routledge.
28.
Junker, B.
1960. Field work: An introduction to the social sciences.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Leege, D. C.
, and Gremillion, J., eds. 1984. Notre Dame study of Catholic parish life.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
30.
Leonard, John-Brooks.1991. Children of the promise: A place in the assembly.Assembly17 (4): 524-526.
31.
Lewinski, Ron.1990. Celebrating first communion.Liturgy 90 (Jan.): 10-15.
32.
Maines, D.1993. Narrative's moment and sociology's phenomena: Toward a narrative sociology.The Sociological Quarterly34:17-38.
33.
Maines, D.
, N. Sugrue, and M. Katovich.1983. The sociological import of G.H. Mead's theory of the past.American Sociological Review48:151-173.
34.
McCallion, M. J. 1996. The implementation of the rite of Christian initiation of adults in city and suburban parishes of the Archdiocese of Detroit. Ph.D. diss., Wayne State University.
35.
Ragin, C.
, and H. Becker, eds. 1992. What is a case?New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Rendler, E.
1995. Liturgy 2000. Presentation to the Detroit Archdiocese, May 17.
37.
Roth, J.
1963. Timetables.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
38.
Strauss, A.
1993. Continual permutations of action.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
39.
Van Maanen, J.
1988. Tales of the field.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Warner, S. R.1993. Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States.American Journal of Sociology98:1044-1093.
