BLUMER, H.
(1954) “What is wrong with social theory?”Amer. Soc. Rev.19: 3-10.
2.
DENZIN, N.
(1978) The Research Act (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
FINE, G.
and S. KLEINMAN (1986) “Interpreting the sociological classics: can there be a `true' reading of Mead?”Symbolic Interaction9 (1): 129-146.
4.
HAMMERSLEY, M.
(1989) The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition.London: Routledge.
5.
HARVEY, L.
(1987) Myths of the Chicago School.Aldershot, England: Avebury/Gower.
6.
WILLIAMS, R.
(1976) “Symbolic interactionism: fusion of theory and research,” pp. 115-137 in D. C. Thorns (ed.) New Directions in Sociology.London: David & Charles.
