ALEXANDER, J.
(1987) Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II.New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
2.
ATHENS, L.
(1984) “Blumer's method of naturalistic inquiry: a critical analysis,” pp. 241-257 in N. Denzin (ed.) Studies in Symbolic Interaction.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
BECKER, H. S.
(1988) “Herbert Blumer's conceptual impact.”Symbolic Interaction11: 13-31.
4.
BLUMER, H.
(1931) “Science without concepts.”Amer. J. of Sociology36: 515-533.
5.
BLUMER, H.
(1939) “Introduction,” pp. xxvii-xxix in P. Young (ed.) Scientific Social Surveys and Research.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
BLUMER, H.
(1941-1942) “Rejoinder.”Amer. J. of Sociology47: 743-745.
7.
BLUMER, H.
(1948a) “Public opinion and public opinion polling.”Amer. Soc. Rev.13: 542-554.
8.
BLUMER, H.
(1948b) “Sociological theory in industrial relations.”Amer. Soc. Rev.12: 271-278.
9.
BLUMER, H.
(1949) “Group tension and interest organization,” pp. 1-15 in Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association.
10.
BLUMER, H.
(1954a) “Social structure and power conflict,” pp. 232-239 in A. Kornhauseret al. (eds.) Industrial Conflict.New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
BLUMER, H.
(1954b) “What is wrong with social theory?”Amer. Soc. Rev.19:3-10.
12.
BLUMER, H.
(1955) “Reflections in theory in race relations,” pp. 3-21 in A. Lind (ed.) Race Relations in World Perspective.Honolulu: Univ. of Hawaii Press.
13.
BLUMER, H.
(1962) “Society as symbolic interaction,” pp. 179-192 in A. Rose (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Processes.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
BLUMER, H.
(1969) Symbolic Interaction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
BLUMER, H.
and P. HAUSER (1933) Movies, Delinquency, and Conduct.New York: Macmillan.
16.
CICOUREL, A.
(1964) Method and Measurement in Sociology.New York: Free Press.
17.
CLIFFORD, J.
and G. MARCUS [eds.] (1986) Writing Culture.Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
18.
COSER, L.
(1976) “Sociological theory from the Chicago dominance to 1965.”Annual Rev. of Sociology2: 145-160.
19.
COUCH, C.
(1988) “Doing research: what Blumer told us to do and what he didn't tell us to do, but should have.” Paper presented at the Interactionist Research `88 Conference, University of Windsor.
20.
DEWEY, J.
(1896) “The reflex arc concept in psychology.”Psych. Rev.363-370.
21.
DEWEY, J.
(1926) Experience and Nature.New York: Dover.
22.
FEINSTEIN, A.
(1988) “Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life.”Science242: 1257-1263.
23.
FISHER, B.
and A. STRAUSS (1978) “Interactionism,” pp. 457-498 in T. Bottomore and R. Nisbet (eds.) The History of Sociological Analysis.New York: Basic Books.
24.
FUCHS, S.
and J. TURNER (1986) “What makes a science `mature'? Patterns of control in scientific production.”Soc. Theory4: 143-150.
25.
GIDDENS, A.
(1972) “Four myths in the history of social thought.”Economy and Society1: 357-385.
26.
LEIBERSON, S.
(1985) Making it Count.Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
27.
MAINES, D.
(1988) “Myth, text, and interactionist complicity in the neglect of Blumer's macrosociology.”Symbolic Interaction11: 43-57.
28.
MORRIONE, T.
[ed.] (forthcoming) The Collected Papers of Herbert Blumer: The Foundations of Symbolic Interactionism.Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
29.
PERINBANAYAGAM, R.
(1986) “The meaning of uncertainty and the uncertainty of meaning.”Symbolic Interaction9: 105-126.
30.
PILLSBURY, W. B.
(1929) History of Psychology.New York: W. W. Norton.
31.
RAUMA, D.
(1981) “Herbert Blumer, the scientific attitude and the problem of demarcation,” pp. 507-514 in G. Stone and H. Farberman (eds.) Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction.New York: John Wiley.
32.
REDFIELD, R.
(1962) “Memorandum for Herbert Blumer,” pp. 21-23 in M. P. Redfield (ed.) Human Nature and the Study of Society: The Papers of Robert Redfield.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
33.
STRYKER, S.
(1980) Symbolic Interaction: A Social Structural Version.Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
34.
ZEITLIN, I.
(1973) Rethinking Sociology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
