Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Too often, practitioners and theorists alike have tended to locate organizational culture in the mottoes and symbolic acts of top managers and to attribute to those leaders the ability to change and manage meaning from visible, yet distant, perches on the organizational chart. By contrast, I propose that the study of organizational culture focus on the networks of social interaction that constitute organizational life, and the rituals that support those interactions. This perspective is derived from an analysis of International Harvester's six-month-long UAW strike in 1979. In this case, management tried to redefine the established labor-relations culture by eliminating those managers who carried and reproduced that culture, but in doing so they also eliminated the company's knowledge of the subtle interaction rituals that had guided and supported labor negotiations. This, I argue, was a major factor contributing to the breakdown of negotiations at IH in 1979.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BLUESTONE, B. and B. HARRISON (1982) The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.

BOURDIEU, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

CAPELLI, P. (1985) “Theory construction in IR and some implications for research.” Industrial Relations 24(1): 90-112.

COMAROFF, J. L. (1982) “Dialectical systems, history, and anthropology: units of study and questions of theory.” J. of Southern African Studies 8(2): 143-172.

DEAL, T. E. and A. KENNEDY (1982) Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. London: Addison-Wesley.

FINE, G. A. (1984) “Negotiated orders and organizational cultures.” Annual Rev. of Sociology 10: 239-262.

FRIEDMAN, R. A. (1987) “Organizational change and cultural analysis: redefining labor relations at International Harvester.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

GARFINKEL, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

GIDDENS, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

10.

KOCHAN, T. (1980) Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations: From Theory to Practice. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

11.

KOLB, D. (1984) The Mediators. Cambridge: MIT Press.

12.

LAX, D. A. and J. K. SEBENIUS (1986) The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.

13.

MERRY, S. E. and S. S. SILBEY (1984) “What do plaintiffs want?: reexamining the concept of dispute.” Justice System J. 9(2): 151-178.

14.

PETERS, E. (1955) Strategy and Tactics in Labor Negotiations. New London, CT: National Foremen's Institute.

15.

PETERS, T. J. and R. H. WATERMAN, Jr. (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.

16.

PFEFFER, J. (1981) “Management as symbolic action,” pp. 1-52 in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

17.

SCOTT, M. B. and S. M. LYMAN (1968) “Accounts.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 33: 46-62.

18.

SMIRCICH, L. and G. MORGAN (1982) “Leadership: the management of meaning.” J. of Applied Behavior Sci. 18(2): 257-273.

19.

WALTON, R. E. and R. B. McKERSIE (1965) A Behavior Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

INTERACTION NORMS AS CARRIERS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References