ADLER, P. A.
and P. ADLER (1987) “The past and the future of ethnography.”J. of Contemporary Ethnography16: 4-24.
2.
BECKER, H. S.
and B. GEER (1957) “Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison.”Human Organization16: 28-32.
3.
BIRDWHISTELL, R. L.
(1966) “The American family: some perspectives.”Psychiatry29: 203-212.
4.
BLUMER, H.
(1969) Symbolic Interactionism.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BOOTH, A.
(1986) “Editorial comments.”J. of Marriage and the Family48: 3.
6.
BURGESS, E. W.
(1926) “The family as a unity of interacting personalities.”The Family7: 3-9.
7.
BURR, W. R.
, D. A. HERRIN, R. D. DAY, I. F. BEUTLER, and G. K. LEIGH (1987) “An epistemological basis for primary explanations in family science.” Presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Atlanta, GA.
8.
CAVAN, R. S.
(1983) “The Chicago school of sociology, 1818-1933.”Urban Life11: 407-420.
9.
EMERSON, R. M.
(1987) “Four ways to improve the craft of fieldwork.”J. of Contemporary Ethnography16: 69-89.
10.
FORM, W.
(1987) “Two issues: documentation and nonstatistical manuscripts.”Amer. Soc. Rev.52: vi.
11.
GRANT, L.
, K. B. WARD, and X. L. RONG (1987) “Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research?”Amer. Soc. Rev.52: 856-862.
12.
HILL, R.
and D. HANSEN (1960) “The identification of conceptual frameworks utilized in family study.”Marriage and Family Living22: 299-311.
13.
HOMANS, G. C.
(1986) “Fifty years of sociology.”Annual Rev. of Sociology12: xiii-xxx.
14.
HUBER, B. J.
(1988) “Methods and statistics requirements for the M.A. degree.”Footnotes [Newsletter of the American Sociological Association]16: 3.
15.
HUTTER, M.
(1985) “Symbolic interactionism and the study of the family,” pp. 117-152 in H. A. Farberman and R. S. Perinbanayagam (eds.) Foundations of Interpretive Sociology: Original Essays in Symbolic Interaction, Supplement 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
JOHNSON, J. M.
(1987) “Review symposium on field methods.”J. of Contemporary Ethnography16: 94-110.
17.
KLEIN, D.
(1979) “A social history of a grass-roots institution: the case of the NCFR Workshop on Theory Construction and Research Methodology.” Presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Boston, MA.
18.
KUHN, A.
(1974) The Logic of Social Systems.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
LaROSSA, R.
(forthcoming) “Homogenization in family studies.”J. of Family Issues.
20.
LaROSSA, R.
and J. H. WOLF (1985) “On qualitative family research.”J. of Marriage and the Family47: 531-541.
21.
LaROSSA, R.
, L. A. BENNETT, and R. J. GELLES (1981) “Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research.”J. of Marriage and the Family43: 303-313.
22.
LePLAY, F.
(1855) Les Ouvriers Europeens.Tours, France: Alfred Mame et Fils.
23.
LIAZOS, A.
(1972) “The poverty of the sociology of deviance: nuts, sluts, and `preverts'.”Social Problems20: 103-120.
24.
LOFLAND, J.
(1987) “Reflections on a thrice-named journal.”J. of Contemporary Ethnography16: 25-40.
25.
LOFLAND, J.
and L. H. LOFLAND (1984) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26.
LOFLAND, L. H.
(1983) “Understanding urban life: the Chicago legacy.”Urban Life11: 491-511.
27.
MELTZER, B. N.
and J. W. PETRAS (1972) “The Chicago and lowa schools of symbolic interactionism,” pp. 43-57 in J. G. Manis and B. G. Meltzer (eds.) Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
MORGAN, D.
(1981) “Men, masculinity and the process of sociological enquiry,” pp. 83-113 in H. Roberts (ed.) Doing Feminist Research.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
29.
MULLINS, N.
(1973) Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology.New York: Harper & Row.
30.
PLUMMER, K.
(1983) Documents of Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of a Humanistic Method.London: George Allen & Unwin.
31.
RITZER, G.
(1977) Working: Conflict and Change.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
SPREY, J.
(1982) “Editorial comments.”J. of Marriage and the Family44: 5.
33.
STODDART, K.
[ed.] (1986) Qualitative Research Methods: Syllabi and Instructional Materials.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
34.
THOMAS, W. I.
and F. ZNANIECKI (1918-1920) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (originally published in five volumes).Boston: Gorham.
35.
TROW, M.
(1957) “Comment on `Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison'.”Human Organization16: 33-35.
36.
ZARETSKY, E.
(1984) “Editor's introduction,” pp. 1-53 in E. Zaretsky's edited and abridged version of W. I. Thomas and F. Znaniecki's The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Urbana and Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.
