ADAMS, R. N.
and J. J. PREISS [eds.] (1960) Human Organization Research. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
2.
ADLER, P.
and P. A. ADLER (forthcoming) Membership Roles in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AGAR, M.
(1980) The Professional Stranger. New York: Academic Press.
4.
AGAR, M.
(1986) Speaking of Ethnography. Newbury park, CA: Sage.
5.
BATESON, M. C.
(1984) With a Daughter's Eye. New York: Washington Square Press.
6.
BECKER, H. S.
(1963) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
7.
BECKER, H. S.
(1967) “Whose side are we on?”Social Problems14: 239-247.
8.
BECKER, H. S.
and B. GEER(1960) “Participant observation: the analysis of qualitative field data,” pp. 267-289 in R. N. Adams and J. J. Preiss (eds.) Human Organization Research. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
9.
BECKER, H. S.
, B. GEER, E. HUGHES, and A. STRAUSS (1961) Boys in White. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
10.
BERREMAN, G. D.
(1962) Behind Many Masks: Ethnography and Impression Management in a Himalayan Hill Village. Ithaca, NY: Society for Applied Anthropology.
11.
BOGDAN, R.
and S. J. TAYLOR (1975) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: John Wiley.
12.
BULMER, M.
(1984) The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
13.
BURGESS, E. W.
(1927) “Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research.”Sociology and Social Research12: 103-120.
14.
BURGESS, R. G.
(1982) “Some role problems in field research,” pp. 45-49 in R. G. Burgess (ed.) Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London: Allen & Unwin.
15.
BURGESS, R. G.
(1983) In the Field. London: Allen & Unwin.
16.
CASAGRANDE, J. B.
and K. L. HALE (1967) “Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions,” pp. 81-105 in D. Hymes and D. E. Bittle (eds.) Studies in Southwestern Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
17.
CASSELL, J.
[ed.] (1987) Children in the Field: Anthropological Experiences. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
18.
COHEN, R.
and R. NAROLL (1970) “Method in cultural anthropology,” pp. 3-24 in R. Naroll and R. Cohen (eds.) Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
19.
CRAPANZANO, V.
(1970) “The writing of ethnography.”Dialectical Anthropology2: 69-73.
20.
CRAPANZANO, V.
(1980) Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
21.
CRAPANZANO, V.
(1985) Waiting: The Whites of South Africa. New York: Random House.
22.
DAVIS, F.
(1963) Passage through Crisis. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
23.
DIAMOND, S.
[ed.] (1980) Anthropology, Ancestors and Heirs. The Hague: Mouton.
24.
DOUGLAS, J. D.
(1976) Investigative Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
DOUGLAS, J. D.
and J. M. JOHNSON [eds.] (1977) Existential Sociology. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
26.
DUMONT, J. - P.
(1978) The Headman and I: Ambiguity and Ambivalence in the Fieldwork Experience. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
27.
ELLEN, R. F.
[ed.] (1984) “Introduction,” pp. 1-12 in Ethnographic Research. New York: Academic Press.
28.
EMERSON, R. M.
[ed.] (1983) “Introduction,” pp. 1-35Contemporary Field Research. Boston: Little, Brown.
29.
EMERSON, R. M.
(1984) “From the new editor.”Urban Life13: 3-6.
30.
EVERHART, R. B.
(1977) “Between stranger and friend: some consequences of `long-term' fieldwork in schools.”Amer. Educ. Research J.14: 1-15.
31.
FIELDING, N. G.
and J. L. FIELDING (1986) Linking Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
FILSTEAD, W. J.
[ed.] (1970) Qualitative Methodology. Chicago: Markham.
33.
FRAKE, C. O.
(1964) “Notes on queries in ethnography.”Amer. Anthropologist66: 132-145.
34.
FREILICH, M.
[ed.] (1970) “Toward a formalization of field work,” pp. 485-585 in Marginal Natives. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
FUJISAKA, S. J.
and J. GRAZEL (1978) “Partnership research: a case of divergent ethnographic styles in prison fieldwork.”Human Organization37: 173-179.
36.
GARFINKEL, H.
(1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
GEERTZ, C.
(1973) The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
38.
GOFFMAN, E.
(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
39.
GOLD, R. L.
(1958) “Roles in sociological field observation.”Social Forces36: 217-223.
40.
GOODENOUGH, W.
(1956) “Componential analysis and the study of meaning.”Language32: 195-216.
41.
GOODENOUGH, W.
(1964) “Cultural anthropology and linguistics,” in D. Hymes (ed.) Language and Culture in Society. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
GUSFIELD, J.
(1963) Symbolic Crusade. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Press.
43.
HABENSTEIN, R. (1954) “The American funeral director.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
44.
HABENSTEIN, R.
(1970) Pathways to Data. Chicago: Aldine.
45.
HAMMERSLEY, M.
and P. ATKINSON (1983) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York: Tavistock.
46.
HARRIS, M.
(1968) The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Crowell.
47.
HOMANS, G. C.
(1986) “Fifty years of sociology.”Annual Rev. of Sociology12: xxii-xxx.
48.
IRWIN, J.
(1975) “Editors' report.”Urban Life4: 3-4.
49.
JARVIE, I. C.
(1969) “The problem of ethical integrity in participant observation.”Current Anthropology10: 505-508.
50.
JOHNSON, J. M.
(1975) Doing Field Research. New York: Free Press.
51.
JULES-ROSETTE, B.
(1975) African Apostles. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
52.
JUNKER, B.
(1960) Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
53.
KEATING, P.
[ed.] (1976) Into Unknown England, 1866-1913. Manchester, England: Manchester Univ. Press.
54.
KEEN, F.
(1985) “Definitions of kin.”J. of Anthropological Research41: 62-90.
55.
KIRK, J.
and M. L. MILLER (1986) Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
LOFLAND, J.
and L. LOFLAND (1984) Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
57.
LOUNSBURY, F. G.
(1956) “A semantic analysis of the Pawnee kinship usage.”Language32: 158-184.
58.
MANES, J. I.
(1976) Semantic Relations in American English Folk Definitions. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Microfilm.
59.
MANNING, P. K.
(1978) “Editor's remarks.”Urban Life7: 283-284.
60.
MANNING, P. K.
(1982) “Qualitative methods,” pp. 1-28 in R. B. Smith and P. K. Manning (eds.) A Handbook of Social Science Methods, vol. 2: Qualitative Methods. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
61.
McCALL, G. J.
and J. L. SIMMONS [eds.] (1969) Issues in Participant Observation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
62.
MEHAN, H.
and H. WOOD (1975) The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley.
63.
METZGER, D.
and G. E. WILLIAMS (1966) “Some procedures and results in the study of native categories: Tzeltal firewood.”Amer. Anthropologist68: 389-407.
64.
MILLER, S. M.
(1952) “The participant observer and `over-rapport'.”Amer. Soc. Rev.17: 97-99.
65.
NAROLL, R.
(1962) Data Quality Control. New York: Free Press.
66.
NAROLL, R.
(1970) “Data quality control in cross-cultural surveys,” pp. 927-945 in R. Naroll and R. Cohen (eds.) A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
67.
PELTO, P.
and G. PELTO (1973) Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
68.
PLATT, J. (1981) “Whatever happened to the case study? or from Znaniecki to Lazarsfeld in one generation.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Sussex.
69.
PLATT, J.
(1983) “The development of the `participant observation' method in sociology: origin, myth and history.”J. of the History of the Behavioral Sciences19: 379-393.
70.
POWDERMAKER, H.
(1966) Stranger and Friend. The Way of an Anthropologist. New York: Norton.
71.
PUNCH, M.
(1986) The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72.
RABINOW, P.
(1977) Reflection of Fieldwork in Morocco. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
73.
ROHNER, R.
(1966) “Franz Boas: ethnographer of the Northwest,” In J. Helm (ed.) Pioneers of American Anthropology. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press.
74.
ROSALDO, M. Z.
(1980) Knowledge and Passion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75.
ROTH, J.
(1963) Timetables. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merril.
76.
SCHOLTE, B.
(1980) “Anthropological traditions: their definitions,” in S. Diamond (ed.) Anthropology: Ancestors and Heirs. The Hague: Mouton.
77.
SCHWARTZ, H.
and J. JACOBS (1979) Qualitative Sociology. New York: Free Press.
78.
SCHWARTZ, M. S.
and C. G. SCHWARTZ (1955) “Problems in participant observation.”Amer. J. of Sociology60: 343-353.
79.
SHAFFIR, W.
, R. STEBBINS, and A. TUROWETZ [eds.] (1980) Fieldwork Experience. New York: St. Martin's.
80.
SILVERMAN, D.
(1985) Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
81.
SPECTOR, M.
and R. FAULKNER (1980) “Thoughts on five new journals and some old ones.”Comtemporary Sociology9: 477-482.
82.
SPRADLEY, J. P.
(1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
83.
SPRADLEY, J. P.
(1980) Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
84.
TURNER, V.
(1985) On the Edge of the Bush: Anthropology as Experience. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.
85.
VAN MAANEN, J.
(1983) Varieties of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
86.
VAN MAANEN, J.
(1984) “Before the flood.”Urban Life13: 99-102.
87.
VIDICH, A.
(1955) “Participant observation and the collection and interpretation of data.”Amer. J. of Sociology60: 354-360.
88.
WARNER, W. L.
and P. S. LUNT (1941) The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
89.
WARNER, W. L.
and P. S. LUNT (1942) The Status System of a Modern Community. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
90.
WAX, M. L.
(1972) “Tenting with Malinowski.”Amer. Soc. Review37: 1-13.
91.
WAX, R.
(1971) Doing Fieldwork. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
92.
WEBB, E. J.
(1966) Unobtrusive Measures. Chicago: Rand McNally.
93.
WERNER, O.
(1966) “Pragmatics and ethnoscience.”Anthro. Linguistics8: 42-65.
94.
WERNER, O.
(1983) “Microcomputers in cultural anthropology.”Byte7: 250-280.
95.
WERNER, O.
and G. M. SCHOEPFLE (1986a) Systematic Fieldwork: Foundations of Ethnography and Interviewing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
96.
WERNER, O.
(1986b) Systematic Fieldwork: Ethnographic Analysis and Data Management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
