Gender socialization in urban societies is acknowledged to occur primarily in preadolescence Risman's analysis of one college sorority displays additional ways in which women adopt role-specific behaviors that are formally encouraged by both official regulations and informally shaped by cultural norms. Her data suggest that the socialization processes and the consequent roles may in fact be inappropriate for facilitating women's adaptation to a changing social environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bernard, J. (1972) The Future of Marriage. New YorkBantam.
2.
Gerth, H. and C. Wright Mills (1953) "Institutions and persons," in Jerome G Manis and Bernard N Meltzer (eds ) Symbolic Interaction A Reader in Social Psychology. BostonAllyn Bacon
3.
Giallombardo, R. (1966) Society of Women. A Study of Women's PrisonsNew York: John Wiley
4.
Goffman, E. (1961 a) Encounters . Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
5.
——— (1961b) Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
6.
Hewitt, J. (1979) Self and Society A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
7.
Komarovsky, M. (1946) "Cultural contradictions and sex roles." Amer J. of Sociology52, 3: 184.
8.
Reiss, I. (1965) "Social class and campus dating " Social Problems13 (Fall)
9.
Schurr, E. M. (1971) Labeling Deviant BehaviorNew York: Harper & Row
10.
Scott, J. F. (1965) "The American college sorority its role in class and ethnic endogamy." Amer Soc. Rev.
11.
Shibutani, T. (1955) "Reference groups as perspectives " Amer. J. of Sociology60: 562-569.
12.
Turner, J. H. (1978) "Symbolic interactionism and social organization," in Jerome G. Manis and Bernard N. Meltzer (eds ) Symbolic Interaction A Reader in Social Psychology . BostonAllyn & Bacon
13.
Waller, W. (1937) "The rating and dating complex " Amer. Soc Rev2 (October): 727-734.