The study of communication and gender variance across cultures can be enhanced through collaboration with interpreters/translators. In the field of media and communication studies, trans and gender-diverse (TGD) researchers could bring their lived experience to a wider range of comparative cross-linguistic research with the aid of language interpreters. Using a distributed knowledge framework, an interpreter/translator can meet the needs of a cross-linguistic qualitative study, as I demonstrate with three vignettes from my own experience. Embracing distributed knowledge welcomes marginalized perspectives in scholarship and also encourages dominant-group researchers to seek out collaborators from the groups they study, such as TGD people. I conclude with a call for gender-just epistemologies, which disrupt normative assumptions about academic authority and recognize that a shared experience of gender divergence may do more to foster understanding, meaning-making, and respect for informants than does a shared linguistic background.
AbramsonCorey M.GongNeil (eds). 2020. Beyond the Case: The Logics and Practices of Comparative Ethnography. Oxford University Press.
2.
AdjeiStephen BaffourSamSarah TaraSekyereFrank OwusuBoatengPhilip. 2022. “Sign Language Interpreter-Mediated Qualitative Interview with Deaf Participants in Ghana: Some Methodological Reflections for Practice.” The Qualitative Report27, no. (1): 79–95.
BermanRachel C.TyyskäVappu. 2011. “A Critical Reflection on the Use of Translators/Interpreters in a Qualitative Cross-Language Research Project.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods10, no. (2), 178–90.
5.
BoellstorffTomNardiBonniePearceCeliaTaylorT. L.2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.
6.
ByrdAntonio. 2023. “Truth-Telling: Critical Inquiries on LLMs and the Corpus Texts that Train Them.” Composition Studies51, no. (1): 135–42.
7.
CharltonJames I.1998. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. University of California Press.
8.
ChevyRay. n.d. “Chevy ‘look at my dog’ Ray” (@ChevyRay) / X. Retrieved July 10, 2024, from https://x.com/chevyray
9.
CliffordJames. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Harvard University Press.
10.
CliffordJamesMarcusGeorge E.2010. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (25th anniversary ed.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1986)
11.
CrenshawKimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43, no. (6): 1241–99.
12.
CreswellJohn W.PothCheryl N.2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage.
13.
CrootElizabeth J.LeesJanetGrantGordon. 2011. “Evaluating Standards in Cross-Language Research: A Critique of Squires’ Criteria.” International Journal of Nursing Studies48, no. (8): 1002–11.
14.
Darling-WolfFabienne. 1998. “White Bodies and Feminist Dilemmas: On the Complexity of Positionality.” Journal of Communication Inquiry22, no. (4): 410–25.
15.
Darling-WolfFabienne. 2003. “Negotiation and Position: On the Need and Difficulty of Developing ‘Thicker Descriptions.’” In Global Media Studies: Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by MurphyPatrick D.KraidyMarwan M., 109–24. Routledge.
16.
Darling-WolfFabienne. 2004. “On the Possibility of Communicating: Feminism and Social Position.” Journal of Communication Inquiry28, no. (1): 29–46.
17.
DenzinNorman K.1994. “The Art and Politics of Interpretation.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S., 500–15. Sage.
18.
DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S.2008. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The Landscape of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.), edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S., 1–43. Sage.
19.
Engels-SchwarzpaulA.-Chr. 2015. “The Ignorant Supervisor: About Common Worlds, Epistemological Modesty and Distributed Knowledge.” Educational Philosophy and Theory47, no. (12): 1250–64.
20.
EgilssonBjörn RúnarDockettSueEinarsdóttirJóhanna. 2022. “Methodological and Ethical Challenges in Cross-Language Qualitative Research: The Role of Interpreters.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal30, no. (4): 638–52.
21.
ElderBrent C.SchwartzMichael A.2021. “Qualitative Research Within the Deaf Community in Northern Ireland: A Multilingual Approach.” Alter15, no. (3): 230–48.
HarawayDonna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies14, no. (3): 575–99.
24.
HardingSandra. 1992. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” The Centennial Review36, no. (3): 437–70.
25.
HardingSandra. 2015. Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HaythornthwaiteCaroline. 2006. “Articulating Divides in Distributed Knowledge Practice.” Information, Communication & Society9, no. (6): 761–80.
JohnsonE. Patrick. 2019. “Put a Little Honey in my Sweet Tea: Oral History as Quare Performance.” In Imagining Queer Methods, edited by GhazianiAminBrimMatt, 45–62. New York University Press.
30.
KattariShanna K.WhitfieldDarren L.WallsN. EugeneLangenderfer-MagruderLisaRamosDaniel. 2016. “Policing Gender Through Housing and Employment Discrimination: Comparison of Discrimination Experiences of Transgender and Cisgender LGBQ Individuals.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research7, no. (3): 427–47.
KniselyKris A.2022. “Teaching Trans Knowledges: Situating Expansive Possibilities in an Intermediate French Course.” In Diversity and Decolonization in French Studies: New Approaches to Teaching, edited by BouamerSihamBourdeauLoïc, 165–80. Springer.
33.
KniselyKris A.2023. “Gender-Justice Beyond Inclusion: How Trans Knowledges and Linguistic Practices can and Should be Re-Shaping Language Education.” The Modern Language Journal107, no. (2): 607–23.
34.
KoscieszaAiden James. 2023. “Traveling Texts, Transgender Lives: Imaginative Resources, Transcultural Media, and the Globalization of Gender.” PhD dissertation, Department of Media and Communication, Temple University.
35.
LópezÁrtemis. 2022. “Trans(de)letion: Audiovisual Translations of Gender Identities for Mainstream Audiences.” Journal of Language and Sexuality11, no. (2): 217–39.
36.
LoweEdward D.SchneggMichael. 2020. “Introduction: Comparative Ethnography: Its Promise, Process, and Successful Implementations.” In Comparing Cultures: Innovations in Comparative Ethnography, edited by SchneggMichaelLoweEdward D., 1–20. Cambridge University Press.
37.
MeadMargaret. 1939. “Native Languages as Field-Work Tools.” American Anthropologist41, no. (2): 189–205.
38.
Minh-HaTrinh T.1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Indiana University Press.
39.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 2023. “Border Measures to Prevent the Spread of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19).” Retrieved July 29, 2024, from https://www.mofa.go.jp/ca/fna/page4e_001053.html
40.
MurphyPatrick D.KraidyMarwan M.2003. “Towards an Ethnographic Approach to Global Media Studies.” In Global Media Studies: Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by MurphyPatrick D.KraidyMarwan M., 3–19. Routledge.
ParameswaranRadhika. 2001. “Feminist Media Ethnography in India: Exploring Power, Gender, and Culture in the Field.” Qualitative Inquiry7, no. (1): 69–103.
46.
PfenningerSimone E.FestmanJuliaSingletonDavid. 2023. Second Language Acquisition and Lifelong Learning. Routledge.
47.
PfenningerSimone E.SingletonDavid. 2019. “Starting Age Overshadowed: The Primacy of Differential Environmental and Family Support Effects on Second Language Attainment in an Instructional Context.” Language Learning69, no. (51): 207–34.
RookeAlison. 2009. “Queer in the Field: On Emotions, Temporality, and Performativity in Ethnography.” Journal of Lesbian Studies13, no. (2): 149–60.
50.
SchepensJobvan HoutRoelandJaegerT. Florian. 2020. “Big Data Suggest Strong Constraints of Linguistic Similarity on Adult Language Learning.” Cognition194, no. (2020): 104056.
51.
SheppardKate. 2011. “Using American Sign Language Interpreters to Facilitate Research Among Deaf Adults: Lessons Learned.” Journal of Transcultural Nursing22, no. (2): 129–34.
52.
SimcockPeterManthorpeJillTinkerAnthea. 2025. “Giving Voice by Doing with not Doing Through: Collaborating with Tactile Sign Language Interpreters in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Research Involving Older Deafblind People.” Qualitative Social Work24, no. (1), 44–60.
53.
SquiresAllison. 2009. “Methodological Challenges in Cross-Language Qualitative Research: A Research Review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies46, no. (2): 277–87.
54.
StrykerSusan. 2006. “(De)subjugated Knowledges: An Introduction to Transgender Studies.” In The Transgender Studies Reader, edited by StrykerSusanWhittleStephen, 1–17. Routledge.
55.
TempleBogusiaYoungAlys. 2004. “Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas.” Qualitative Research: QR4, no. (2): 161–78.
VincentBenjamin William. 2017. “Studying Trans: Recommendations for Ethical Recruitment and Collaboration with Transgender Participants in Academic Research.” Psychology & Sexuality9, no. (2): 102–16.
58.
VogtGabrieleQinSian. 2022. “Sanitizing the National Body: COVID-19 and the Revival of Japan’s ‘Closed Country’ Strategy.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal31, no. (3): 247–69.
