Course administrators hold a unique position in academe—one that requires high levels of emotion management as part of the job. This research utilized a collaborative autoethnography to explore how workplace emotions were experienced in the basic communication course. The experiences were presented through vignettes written and analyzed by seven course administrators from programs across the United States. Four themes emerged from the vignettes: (1) acting perpetually positive, (2) (un)catching emotion, (3) rushing for time, and (4) switching roles. Each theme highlighted the multiple, and sometimes competing, responsibilities/expectations embedded in the administrative role. This research offers a discussion of each theme and informs five recommendations for managing emotions and emotional labor within course administration.
AchesonKrisTaylorJustinLunaKera. 2016. “The Burnout Spiral: The Emotion Labor of Five Rural US Foreign Language Teachers.” Modern Language Journal100 (2): 522–37.
2.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society4 (2): 139–58.
3.
AndersonLindsey B.2019. “Interrogating the Autoethnographic Process and Product: Teaching Autoethnographic Approaches to Communication Research.” Communication Teacher33 (4): 234–38.
4.
AnkerRichard. 1997. “Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex: An Overview.” International Labour Review136 (3): 315–39.
5.
AshcraftKaren Lee. 2013. “The Glass Slipper: ‘Incorporating’ Occupational Identity in Management Studies.” Academy of Management Review38 (1): 6–31.
6.
AshforthBlake E.KreinerGlen E.1999. “‘How Can You Do It?’: Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity.” Academy of Management Review24 (3): 413–434.
7.
AshforthBlake E.KreinerGlen E.ClarkMark A.FugateMel. 2007. “Normalizing Dirty Work: Managerial Tactics for Countering Occupational Taint.” Academy of Management Journal50 (1): 149–174.
8.
AubreyJennifer StevensClickMelissa A.DoughertyDebbie S.FineMark A.KramerMichael W.MeisenbachRebecca J.OlsonLoreen N.SmytheMary-Jeanette. 2008. “We Do Babies! The Trials, Tribulations, and Triumphs of Pregnancy and Parenting in the Academy.” Women’s Studies in Communication31 (2): 186–95.
BoyleMareeParryKen. 2007. “Telling the Whole Story: The Case for Organizational autoethnography.” Culture and Organization13 (3): 185–90.
11.
ChangHeewonNgunjiriFaith WamburaHernandezKathy-Ann C.2012. Collaborative Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
12.
CornelissenJoep P.MantereSakuVaaraEero. 2014. “The Contradiction of Meaning: The Combined Effect of Communication, Emotions, and Materiality on Sensemaking in the Stockwell Shooting.” Journal of Management Studies51 (5): 699–736.
13.
DevnewLynne E.AustinAnn BerghoutLe BerMarlene JanzenLaValleyJudith BabcockElbertChanda D.2017. “Learnining from our Multi-Stage Collaborative Autoethnography.” The Qualitative Report22 (10): 2772–2784.
14.
DiefendorffJames M.EricksonRebecca J.GrandeyAlicia A.DahlingJason J.2011. “Emotional Display Rules as Work Unit Norms: A Multilevel Analysis of Emotional Labor Among Nurses.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology16 (2): 170–86.
15.
EllemersNaolmi. 2014. “Women at Work: How Organizational Features Impact Career Development.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences1 (1): 46–54.
16.
EllisCarolyn. 2009. Revision: Autoethnographic Reflections on Life and Work. New York: Routledge.
17.
EllisCarolynAdamsTony E.BochnerArthur P.2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Qualitative Social Research12 (1): 273–90.
18.
EllisCarolyn S.BochnerArthur P.2006. “Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35 (4): 429–49.
EricksonRebecca J.ChristianRitter. 2001. “Emotional Labor, Burnout, and Inauthenticity: Does Gender Matter?” Social Psychology Quarterly64 (2): 146–63.
21.
FassettDeanna L.WarrenJohn T.2011. Coordinating the Communication Course: A Guidebook. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
22.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
23.
GoldmanZachary W.GoodboyAlan K.2014. “Making Students Feel Better: Examining the Relationships between Teacher Confirmations and College Students’ Emotional Outcomes.” Communication Education63 (3): 259–77.
24.
GrandyAlicia ADiefendorffJames M.RuppDeborah E.2013. “Bringing Emotional Labor into Focus.” In Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work edited by GrandeyA.A.DiefendorffJ.M.RuppD.E., pp. 3–27. New York: Routledge.
HatfieldelaineCacioppoJohm T.RapsonRichard L.1994. Emotional Contagion: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HernandezKathy-Ann C.ChangHeewonNgunjiriFaith W.2017. “Collaborative Autoethnography as Multivocal, Relational, and Democratic Research: Opportunities, Challenges, and Aspirations.” Auto/Biography Studies32 (2): 251–254.
28.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology85: 551–75.
29.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
HumphreyRonald H.AshforthBlake E.DiefendorffJames M.2015. “The Bright Side of Emotional Labor.” Organizational Behavior36 (6): 749–69.
31.
Immordino-YangMary HelenDamasioAntonio. 2007. “We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education.” Mind, Brain, and Education1 (1): 3–10.
32.
InksonKerr. 2007. Understanding Careers: The Metaphors of Working Lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
IrvineJanice M.2014. “Is Sexuality Research ‘Dirty Work’? Institutionalized Stigma in the Production of Sexual Knoweldge.” Sexualities, 17 (5): 632–656.
34.
JubasKaelaSeidelJackie. 2016. “Knitting as Metaphor for Work: An Institutional Autoethnography to Surface Tensions of Visibility and Invisibility in the Neoliberal Academy.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography45 (1): 60–84.
KramerMichael W.BiselRyan S.2017. Organizational Communication: A Liefespan Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
KramerMichael W.HessJon A.2002. “Communication Rules for the Display of Emotion in Organizational Settings.” Management Communication Quarterly16 (1): 66–80.
38.
LapadatJudith C.2017. “Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography.” Qualitative Inquiry23 (8): 589–603.
39.
ListKarenSorcinelliMary Deane. 2018. “Increasing Leadership Capacity for Senior Women Faculty through Mutual Mentoring.” Journal of Faculty Development32 (1): 7–16.
40.
LowcockDianeWarwick-BoothLouiseGrewalParminderUnderwoodSharon. 2017. “Using Vignettes in Qualitative Research: Examples from Health Promotion Research.” Sage Research Methods Cases: Part 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
MapesMeggie. 2019. “Unjust Precarity: Contingent Faculty and the Introductory Communication Course.” Communication Education68 (2): 246–52.
42.
MazerJoseph P.2017. “Associations among Classroom Emotional Processes, Student Interest, and Engagement: A Convergent Validity Test.” Communication Education66 (3): 350–60.
43.
McDonaldJames. 2016. “Occupational Segregation Research: Queering the Conversation.” Gender, Work & Organization23 (1): 19–35.
44.
MeisenbachRebecca J.2008. “Working with Tensions: Materiality, Discourse, and (Dis) Empowerment in Occupational Identity Negotiation among Higher Education Fund-raisers.” Management Communication Quarterly22 (2): 258–87.
45.
MillerKatherine I.ConsidineJennoferGarnerJohny. 2007. “‘Let Me Tell You about My Job’: Exploring the Terrain of Emotion in the Workplace.” Management Communication Quarterly20 (3): 231–60.
46.
MorrealeSherwyn P.MyersScott A.BacklundPhilip M.SimondsCheri J.2016. “Study IX of the Basic Communication Course at Two- and Four-Year U.S. Colleges and Universities: A Re-examination of Our Discipline’s ‘Front Porch.’” Communication Education65 (3): 338–55.
47.
MottetTimothy P.FrymierAnn B.BeebeSteven A.2006. “Theorizing about Instructional Communication.” In Handbook of Instructional Communication, edited by MottetT. P.RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C., 255–82. Boston, MA: Pearson.
48.
NyquistJody D.AbbottRobert D.WulffDonald H.SpragueJo. 1991. Preparing the Professoriate of Tomorrow to Teach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
RyanMichell K.HaslamS. Alexander. 2005. “The Glass Cliff: Evidence That Women Are Over-represented in Precarious Leadership Positions.” British Journal of Management16 (2): 81–90.
TitsworthScottQuinlanMargaret M.MazerJoseph P.2010. “Emotion in Teaching and Learning: Development and Validation of the Classroom Emotions Scale.” Communication Education59 (4): 431–52.
53.
TitsworthScottWaldbuesserCaroline. 2017. “Communication Perspectives on Classroom Emotion.” In Handbook of Instructional Communication: Rhetorical and Relational Perspectives, edited by HouserM. L.HosekA., 138–50. New York: Routledge.
54.
TracySarah J.2000. “Becoming a Character for Commerce: Emotion Labor, Self-Subordination and Discursive Construction of Identity in a Total Institution.” Management Communication Quarterly14 (1): 90–128.
55.
TracySarah J.2004. “The Construction of Correctional Officers: Layers of Emotionality behind Bars.” Qualitative Inquiry10 (4): 509–33.
VanderkamLaura. 2018. Off the Clock. East Rutherford, NJ: Portfolio, Penguin.
58.
Van MaanenJohn. 2011. Tales of the Field. On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
59.
VickersMargaret H.2003. “Autoethnography as Sensemaking: A Story of Bullying.” Culture and Organization13 (3): 223–37.
60.
WayA. DanielleMarquesJoan. 2013. “Management of Gender Roles: Marketing the Androgynous Leadership Style in the Classroom and General Workplace.” Organizational Development Journal31 (2): 82–94.
61.
WeickKarl E.1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
62.
WeickKarl E.1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
WilliamsJ. PatrickJauhari bin ZainiMuhammad Kamal. 2016. “Rude Boy Subculture, Critical Pedagogy, and the Collaborative Construction of an Analytic and Evocative Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography45 (1): 34–59.
64.
ZhangQinZhuWeihong. 2008. “Exploring Emotion in Teaching: Emotional Labor, Burnout, and Satisfaction in Chinese Higher Education.” Communication Education57 (1): 105–22.
