How does one make sense of a group of migrant men who spend much of their time together over several years, share a space as well as a social position, and behave in some respects like close friends, yet do not develop stable relationships of solidarity and collective forms of self-perception? What are the micro-foundations of these precarious communities? Drawing upon eight months of ethnographic fieldwork at three day labor sites in Los Angeles, this article explores three interlocking processes that sustain one of the most radical forms of marginality in contemporary the United States. It analyzes the economic, political, and cultural dispossession of day laborers through (1) market competition, (2) the embodiment of an undocumented status, and (3) the internalization of cultural exclusion. These individualizing mechanisms are argued to truncate basic forms of mutual solidarity, producing and reproducing the precarious communities of day laborers.
BaumanZygmunt. 2002. “Foreward by Zygmunt Bauman: Individually, Together.” In Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences, xiv–xix. London: Sage.
2.
BeckUlrichBeck-GernsheimElisabeth. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
3.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4.
ChibberVivek. 2017. “Rescuing Class from the Cultural Turn.” Catalyst1 (1): 26–55.
5.
ClaffeyJames E.2006. “Anti-immigrant Violence in Suburbia.” Social Text24 (388): 73–80.
6.
CleavelandCarolPiersonLeo. 2009. “Parking Lots and Police Undocumented Latinos’ Tactics for Finding Day Labor Jobs.” Ethnography10 (4): 515–33.
7.
EliasNorbert. 1991. The Society of Individuals. New York: Basil Blackwell.
8.
EsbenshadeJill. 2000. “The ‘Crisis’ over Day Labor.” WorkingUSA3 (6): 27–70.
FineJanice. 2006. Worker Centers: Organizing Communities at the Edge of the Dream. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
11.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
HillJennifer. 2010. “Can Unions Use Worker Center Strategies? In an Age of Doing More with Less, Unions Should Consider Thinking Locally but Acting Globally.” FIU Law Review.
13.
HobsbawmEric. 1984. Workers: Worlds of Labor. New York: Pantheon Books.
14.
JerolmackColinKhanShamus. 2014. “Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy.” Sociological Methods & Research43 (2): 178–209.
15.
KallebergArne. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
LaclauErnestoMouffeChantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
17.
LivengoodRebecca J.2013. “Organizing for Structural Change: The Potential and Promise of Worker Centers.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review48:325–56.
18.
LukesSteven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich. 2008. The Communist Manifesto. London: Pluto.
20.
Melero MalpicaDaniel. 2002. “Making a Living in the Streets of Los Angeles: An Ethnographic Study of Day Laborers.” Migraciones InternacionalesI (3): 124–48.
21.
MurphyRaymond. 1985. “Exploitation or Exclusion?”Sociology19 (2): 225–43.
22.
NarroVictor. 2008. “Finding the Synergy Between Law and Organizing: Experiences from the Streets of Los Angeles.” Fordham Urban Law Journal35 (2).
23.
NarroVictor. 2009. “¡Sí Se Puede! Immigrant Workers and the Transformation of the Los Angeles Labor and Worker Center Movements.” Los Angeles Public Interest Law Journal1 (Spring): 65–106.
24.
NeilsonBrettRossiterNed. 2008. “Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception.” Theory, Culture & Society25 (7/8): 51–72.
25.
NichollsWalter. 2016. “Politicizing Undocumented Immigrants One Corner at a Time: How Day Laborers Became a Politically Contentious Group.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40 (2): 299–320.
26.
OrdóñezJuan. 2015. Jornalero. Being a Day Laborer in the USA. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Pinedo TurnovskyCarolyn. 2006. “A La Parada: The Social Practices of Men on a Street Corner.” Social Text24 (388): 55–72.
28.
PurserGretchen. 2009. “The Dignity of Job-Seeking Men: Boundary Work among Immigrant Day Laborers.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38:117–39.
29.
QuesadaJames. 2011. “No Soy Welferero: Undocumented Latino Laborers in the Crosshairs of Legitimation Maneuvers.” Medical Anthropology30 (4): 386–408.
30.
RouseRoger. 1995. “Questions of Identity: Personhood and Collectivity in Transnational Migration to the United States.” Critique of Anthropology15 (4): 351–80.
31.
TheodoreNikValenzuelaAbelJr.MelendezEdwin. 2006. “La Esquina (The Corner): Day Laborers on the Margins of New York’s Formal Economy.” WorkingUSA9 (4): 407–23.
32.
ThompsonE. P.1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present50 (1): 76–136.
33.
ValenzuelaAbel. 2002. “Working on the Margins in Metropolitan Los Angeles: Immigrants in Day-Labor Work.” Migraciones Internacionales1 (2): 6–28.
34.
ValenzuelaAbel. 2003. “Day Labor Work.” Annual Review of Sociology29:307–33.
35.
WadePeter. 2010. Race and Ethnicity in Latin America, 2nd ed.London: Pluto.
36.
WalterNicholasBourgoisPhilippeLoinazH. Margarita. 2004. “Masculinity and Undocumented Labor Migration: Injured Latino Day Laborers in San Francisco.” Social Science & Medicine59 (6): 1159–68.
