Through a fourteen-month ethnography of a cohousing community, this study explores how community members reexamine and redefine their collectivist values in an attempt to develop their ideal community. Cohousers voice distaste for the isolation of contemporary U.S. residential arrangements and collaboratively plan neighborhoods that promote common space, increased social interaction, and collective decision making. Despite these organizing principles, I find that the conditions for social cohesion in one cohousing community are based primarily on concessions to autonomy and privacy, and emphasis on personal rewards for individual members. I demonstrate how this occurs in “Sunrise Place” as the group’s members (1) develop spatial arrangements that emphasize domestic privacy and (2) practice consensus decision making in ways that prioritize individual self-reflection over group debate. I show that cohousers’ apparently contradictory focus on the individual actually aids their collectivist agenda by buttressing members’ investment in the project during a prolonged development process; however, the community they develop is physically and spatially insulated, reproducing aspects of domestic privatism they seek to subvert.
AlbaRichard D.LoganJohn R.1993. “Minority Proximity to Whites in Suburbs: An Individual-Level Analysis of Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology98 (6): 1388–1427.
2.
AndersenRobertGrabbEdwardCurtisJames. 2006. “Trends in Civic Association Activity in Four Democracies: The Special Case of Women in the United States”. American Sociological Review71 (3): 376–400.
BBC Research & Consulting. 2014. 2014 Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis. Prepared for the City of Austin. Draft Report June24, 2014. Denver, CO: BBC Research & Consulting.
5.
BellahRobertMadsenRichardSullivanWilliamSwidlerAnnTiptonSteven. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
CalthorpePeter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the AmericanDream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
7.
ChiodelliFrancesco. 2009. “Abbasso il Cohousing? Analogie e Differenze fra Cohousing e le Cosiddette Gated Communities.” Paper presented at the XXX Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali, Firenze, September 9–12.
8.
ChiodelliFrancesco. 2010. “Enclaves Private a Carattere Residenziale: Il Caso del co-Housing.” Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia51 (1): 95–116.
9.
ChristianDiana Leafe. 2003. Creating a Life Together: Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
10.
ClarkWilliam A. V.1986. “Residential Segregation in American Cities: A Review and Interpretation.” Population Research and Policy Review5:95–127.
11.
DomínguezSilviaWatkinsCeleste. 2003. “Creating Networks for Survival and Mobility: Social Capital among African-American and Latin-American Low-Income Mothers.” Social Problems50 (1): 111–35.
12.
DurkheimEmileMaussMarcel. (1901) 1963. Primitive Classification. Translated by Rodney Needham. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
EdinKathrynLeinLaura. 1997. “Work, Welfare, and Single Mothers’ Economic Survival Strategies.” American Sociological Review6 (2): 253–66.
14.
EtzioniAmitai. 2000. “Creating Good Communities and Good Societies.” Contemporary Sociology29 (1): 188–95.
15.
FarleyJohn E.SquiresGregory D.2005. Fences and Neighbors: Segregation in 21st-century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Fellowship of Intentional Communities. 1994. Intentional Communities. http://www.ic.org (accessed May 22, 2009).
17.
FestingerLeonSchachterStanleyBackKurt W.1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper & Brothers.
FreyWilliam H.2012. Population Growth in Metro America Since 1980: Putting the Volatile 2000s in Perspective. Washington, DC: Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program.
20.
GalsterGeorge. 1988. “Residential Segregation in American Cities: A Contrary Review.” Population Research and Policy Review7:93–112.
21.
GierynThomas F.2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology26:463–96.
22.
JacksonKenneth T.1985. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
JacobsJane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
24.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1972. Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
KleinmanSherryl. 1996. Opposing Ambitions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
LichtermanPaul. 1995. “Beyond the Seesaw Model: Public Commitment in a Culture of Self-Fulfillment.” Sociological Theory13 (3): 275–300.
27.
LoftlandJohn. 1995. “Analytic Ethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24:30–67.
28.
LoftlandJohnSnowDavidAndersonLeonLoftlandLyn H.2006. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
29.
MasseyDouglass S.DentonNancy A.1998. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
McCamantKathrynDurrettCharles. 1988. CoHousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Berkeley, CA: Habitat Press.
31.
McCamantKathryn M.DurrettCharles R.1989. “Cohousing in Denmark.” In New Households New Housing, edited by FranckKaren A., 95–126. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
32.
MertonRobert K.1987. “Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials.” Annual Review of Sociology13:1–28.
33.
National Association of Home Builders. 2004. Facts, Figures & Trends 2004. Washington, DC: National Association of Home Builders.
34.
Pattillo-McCoyMary. 2000. Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril among the Black Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
PendallRolf. 2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–42.
36.
PutnamRobert D.1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy6 (1): 65–78.
37.
RotoloThomasWilsonJohn. 2004. “What Happened to the ‘Long Civic Generation?’ Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.” Social Forces82:1091–1121.
38.
RuiuMaria L.2014. “Differences between Cohousing and Gated Communities. A Literature Review.” Sociological Inquiry84 (2): 316–35.
39.
SargentLyman Tower. 1994. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited.” Utopian Studies5 (1): 1–37.
40.
SargissonLucy. 2012. “Cohousing: A Utopian Property Alternative?” School of Politics and International Relations, Centre for Social and Global Justice, University of Nottingham.
41.
ShawAlanShawMichelle. 1999. “Social Empowerment through Community Networks.” In High Technology and Low Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Information Technology, edited by SchonDonaldSanyalBishwapriyaMichellWilliam. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42.
SmithRonaldBugniValerie. 2002. “Designed Physical Environment as Related to Selves, Symbols, and Social Reality: A Proposal for a Paradigm Shift for Architecture.” Humanity and Society26:293–99.
