This paper examines how members of a southeastern LGBTQ advocacy group privileged heterosexuality through group interactions. Based on twelve months of fieldwork, we analyze how LGBTQ members and their heterosexual allies traded power for (heterosexual) patronage by (1) heterosexualizing their group, (2) sanctifying allies, and (3) privileging parenthood. In so doing, all the members, regardless of their intentions, ultimately reproduced societal patterns of sexual inequality within the context of their group. In conclusion, we draw out implications for understanding (1) the ways LGBTQ people and their heterosexual allies negotiate heterosexual privilege, (2) the ways they construct the meaning and status of heterosexual allies, and (3) some ways dominant groups’ affiliation with subordinate groups may inadvertently facilitate processes of inequality reproduction.
AdamsTony E.2010. “Paradoxes of Sexuality, Gay Identity, and the Closet.” Symbolic Interaction33 (2): 234–56.
2.
BerkowitzDana. 2011. “Maternal Instincts, Biological Clocks, and Soccer Moms: Gay Men’s Parenting and Family Narratives.” Symbolic Interaction34(4): 514–35.
3.
BlumerHerbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BroadK. L.2002. “Social Movement Selves.” Sociological Perspectives45 (3): 317–36.
5.
BroadK. L.2011. “Coming Out for Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays: From Support Group Grieving to Love Advocacy.” Sexualities14 (4): 399–414.
6.
BroadK. L.CrawleySara L.FoleyLara. 2004. “Doing ‘Real Family Values’: The Interpretive Practice of Families in the GLBT Movement.” Sociological Quarterly45 (3): 509–27.
7.
ButlerJudith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
8.
CahillSpencer. 1987. “Children and Civility: Ceremonial Deviance and the Acquisition of Ritual Competence.” Social Psychology Quarterly50 (4): 312–21.
9.
CharmazKathy C.2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CollinsRandall. 1981. “On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology86:984–1014.
11.
CrawleySara L.BroadK. L.2008. “The Construction of Sex and Sexualities.” In Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F., 545–66. New York: Guilford.
12.
DugganLisa. 2004. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
13.
DuneierMitchell. 1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
14.
ElliottSinikka. 2010. “Parents’ Constructions of Teen Sexuality: Sex Panics, Contradictory Discourses, and Social Inequality.” Symbolic Interaction33 (2): 191–212.
15.
FieldsJessica. 2001. “Normal Queers: Straight Parents Respond to Their Children’s ‘Coming Out.’”Symbolic Interaction24:165–87.
16.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Social Life. London: Harper and Row.
19.
GrazianDavid. 2007. “The Girl Hunt: Urban Nightlife and the Performance of Masculinity as Collective Activity.” Symbolic Interaction30:221–33.
20.
IngrahamChrys. 1999. White Weddings: Romancing Heterosexuality in Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.
21.
JohnsonJ. L.BestAmy L.2012. “Radical Normals: The Moral Career of Straight Parents as Public Advocates for Their Gay Children.” Symbolic Interaction35:321–39.
22.
KatzJack. 1975. “Essences as Moral Identities: Verifiability and Responsibility in Imputations of Deviance and Charisma.” American Journal of Sociology80:1369–90.
23.
KleinmanSherryl. 1996. Opposing Ambitions: Gender and Identity in an Alternative Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McQueeneyKrista. 2009. “‘We are God’s Children, Y’All’: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in Lesbian-and-Gay-Affirming Congregations.” Social Problems56:151–73.
26.
MoonDawne. 2004. God, Sex, and Politics: Homosexuality and Everyday Theologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
OrtizSteven M.1997. “Traveling with the Ball Club: A Code of Conduct for Wives Only.” Symbolic Interaction20:225–49.
28.
PlummerKenneth. 1995. “Telling Sexual Stories in a Late Modern World.” In Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 18, edited by DenzinN. K., 101–20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29.
RonaiCarol RamboEllisCarolyn. 1989. “Turn-Ons for Money.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18:271–98.
30.
SchrockDouglas P.SchwalbeMichael. 2009. “Men, Masculinity, and Manhood Acts.” Annual Review of Sociology35:277–95.
31.
SchrockDouglasHoldenDaphneReidLori. 2004. “Creating Emotional Resonance: Interpersonal Emotion Work and Motivational Framing in a Transgender Community.” Social Problems51:61–81.
32.
SchwalbeMichaelGodwinSandraHoldenDaphneSchrockDouglasThompsonShealyWolkomirMichelle. 2000. “Generic Processes in the Reproduction of Inequality: An Interactionist Analysis.” Social Forces79: 419–452.
33.
SchwalbeMichaelMason-SchrockDouglas. 1996. “Identity Work as Group Process.” In Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 13, edited by MarkovskyB.LovagliaM.SimonR., 115–49. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
StomblerMindyMartinPatricia Yancey. 1994. “Bringing Women In, Keeping Women Down: Fraternity ‘Little Sister’ Organizations.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography23 (2): 150–84.
35.
SumerauJ. Edward. 2012. “‘That’s What Men Are Supposed to Do’: Compensatory Manhood Acts in an LGBT Christian Church.” Gender & Society26:461–87.
36.
UenoKojiGentileHaley. 2015a. “Moral Identity in Friendships between Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Students and Straight Students in College.” Symbolic Interaction38(1): 83–102.
37.
UenoKojiGentileHaley. 2015b. “Construction of Status Equality in Friendships between Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Students and Straight Students in College.” Sociological Perspectives58: 402–421.
38.
WarnerMichael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: Free Press.
