Using the work of Freysinger (1995), Deci and Ryan (1985, 2000), and Stebbins (2007) as sensitizing concepts, we use analytic inductive methods to analyze interview data from twenty-six women who had experience as private pilots. Emergent from our data were themes showing that differences in motivations to learn to pilot were correlated with differing social benefits derived from flying. Moreover, our respondents discussed several personal and social benefits beyond durable serious leisure benefits. This exploratory study provides insight into women’s significant investment of time, money, and effort in a male-dominated leisure activity and suggests that women’s motivations for entering into serious leisure may differ from those of men and that when they do, the social benefits they derive vary as well. It suggests the need to revise motivation theories in light of the contextual and fluid nature of factors that prompt people to engage in leisure activities.
AdlerPatriciaAdlerPeter. 1987. Membership Roles in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AraiSusanPedlarAlison. 2003. “Moving beyond Individualism in Leisure Theory: A Critical Analysis of Concepts of Community and Social Engagement.” Leisure Studies22:185–202.
3.
ArkseyHilaryKnightPeter T.1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Random House.
5.
BialeschkiM. DeborahMichenerSarah. 1994. “Re-entering Leisure: Transition within the Role of Motherhood.” Journal of Leisure Research26 (1): 57–74.
BrownCarroll A.McGuireFrancis A.VoelklJudith. 2008. “The Link between Successful Aging and Serious Leisure.” International Journal of Aging and Human66 (1): 73–95.
8.
ButlerJudith. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
9.
CharmazKathy. 1983. “The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation.” In Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, edited by EmersonR. M., 109–26. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
10.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1999. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
11.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology13 (1): 3–21.
12.
CrawfordDuane W.HoutsRenate M.HustonTed L.GeorgeLaura J.2002. “Compatibility, Leisure, and Satisfaction in Marital Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and Family64 (2): 433–49.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiMihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
14.
DeciEdwardRyanRichard M.1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
15.
DeciEdwardRyanRichard M.2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry11:227–68.
16.
DenzinNorman K.1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
FreysingerValeria J.1995. “The Dialectics of Leisure and Development for Women and Men in Mid-life: An Interpretive Study.” Journal of Leisure Research27 (1): 61–84.
GecasViktor. 1989. “The Social Psychology of Self-Efficacy.” Annual Review of Sociology15:291–316.
21.
GibsonHeatherWillmingCynthiaHoldnakAndrew. 2002. “We’re Gators . . . Not Just Gator Fans”: Serious Leisure and University of Florida Football.” Journal of Leisure Research34 (4): 397–425.
22.
GreenEileen. 1998. “‘Women Doing Friendship’: An Analysis of Women’s Leisure as a Site of Identity Construction, Empowerment and Resistance.” Leisure Studies7:171–85.
23.
Hesse-BiberSharleneLeavyPatricia Lina. 2007. Feminist Research Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
HubermanA. MichaelMilesMatthew B.1994. “Data Management and Analysis Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinN.LincolnY., 428–44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
HuntStephen. 2008. “But We’re Men Aren’t We! Living History as a Site of Masculine Identity Construction.” Men and Masculinities10:460–83.
26.
KellyJohn R.1983. Leisure Identities and Interactions. London: Allen & Unwin.
KyleGerardChickGarry. 2002. “The Social Nature of Leisure Involvement.” Journal of Leisure Research34 (4): 426–48.
29.
LeeJin-HyungScottDavid. 2006. “For Better or Worse? A Structural Model of the Benefits and Costs Associated with Recreational Specialization.” Leisure Sciences28:17–38.
30.
LorberJudith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
LyngStephen. 1990. “Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking.” American Journal of Sociology95 (4): 851–86.
32.
MurthyDhiraj. 2008. “Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technology for Social Research.” Sociology45 (5): 837–55.
33.
ParkerStanley. 1976. The Sociology of Leisure. London: George Allen & Unwin.
34.
PattonMichael Q.1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
RojekChris. 2000. Leisure and Culture. New York: St. Martin’s.
36.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist55 (1): 68–78.
37.
StalpMarybeth C.RadinaM. EliseLynchAnnette. 2008. “‘We Do It Cuz It’s Fun’: Gendered Fun and Leisure for Midlife Women through Red Hat Society Membership.” Sociological Perspectives51 (2): 325–48.
38.
StebbinsRobert. 1992. Amateurs, Professionals, and Serious Leisure. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.
39.
StebbinsRobert. 2007. Serious Leisure: A Perspective for Our Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
40.
StebbinsRobert. 2008. “Right Leisure: Serious, Casual, or Project-Based?” NeuroRehabilitation23:335–41.
41.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet. 1994. “Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinN.LincolnY., 273–85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
UnruhDavid R.1979. “Characteristics and Types of Participation in Social Worlds.” Symbolic Interaction2 (2): 115–29.
43.
WalkerGordon J.DengJinyangDieserRodney B.2005. “Culture, Self-Construal, and Leisure Theory and Practice.” Journal of Leisure Research37 (1): 77–99.
44.
WalkerGordon J.WangXiye. 2008. “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Canadian and Mainland Chinese University Students’ Leisure Motivations.” Leisure Sciences30 (3): 179–97.
45.
WatermanAlan S.2005. “When Effort Is Enjoyed: Two Studies of Intrinsic Motivation for Personally Salient Activities.” Motivation and Emotion29 (3): 165–88.
