This article discusses how ethnography can contribute toward the development of sociological theory. It uses a case study of one theoretical idea refined through ethnographic fieldwork—Phil Strong’s (1979; 1988) work on Erving Goffman’s theory of ceremony.The article argues that Strong effectively applied Goffman’s ideas to different settings and successfully extended Goffman’s ideas on ceremony. In doing so, Strong demonstrated how ethnography can be more productive in developing theoretical ideas, but this productivity relied on his personal enthusiasm for theory and fieldwork. Strong’s theoretical empiricism provides an exemplar of how theory and conceptual refinement can grow as a result of doing ethnography the right way.
Atkinson, Paul, A. Coffey, and S. Delamont.2003. Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
3.
Atkinson, Paul, and W. Housley.2003. Interactionism: An essay in sociological amnesia. London: Sage.
4.
Black, Nick.1996. Phil Strong 20 December 1945-11 July 1995. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy1 (1): 3.
5.
Bloor, Michael.1996. Philip M. Strong (1945-1995): An appreciation of an essayist . Sociology of Health and Illness18 (4): 551-64.
6.
Brewer, John.2001. Ethnography. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Chriss, James. 1995. Some thoughts on recent efforts to further systematize Goffman . Sociological Forum10 (1):177-86.
7.
Christensen, Pia, and Alan Prout.2002. Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood9 (4): 477-97.
8.
Davis, Alan.1982. Children in clinics: A sociological analysis of medical work. London: Tavistock.
9.
Delamont, Sara.1984. "The old girl network": Reflections on the fieldwork at St. Luke’s. In The research process in educational settings: Ten case studies, ed. Robert G.Burgess. London: Falmer.
10.
Delamont, Sara.2001. Fieldwork in educational settings. London: Routledge Falmer.
11.
Dingwall, Robert.2001a. Foreword. In The ceremonial order of the clinic: Parents, doctors and medical bureaucracies, ed. P. M. Strong.Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12.
Dingwall, Robert.2001b. Notes toward an intellectual history of symbolic interactionism . Symbolic Interaction24 (2): 237-42.
13.
Edgley, Charles.2003. The dramaturgical genre. In The handbook of symbolic interactionism, ed. Larry Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney.Lanham, MD: Altamira.
14.
Fine, Gary A., and Gregory Smith, eds. 2000. Erving Goffman. London: Sage.
15.
Giddens, Anthony.1988. Goffman as a systematic social theorist. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, ed. Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton.Cam-bridge: Polity.
16.
Glaser, Barney.1964. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis . Social Problems. 12:436-45.
17.
Goffman, Erving.1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
18.
Goffman, Erving.1961. Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction . Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
19.
Goffman, Erving.1981. Review: A reply to Denzin and Keller. Contemporary Sociology10 (1): 60-68.
20.
Goffman, Erving.1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review48 (1): 1-17.
21.
Goffman, Erving.1989. On fieldwork. Trans. L. Lofland. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18:123-32.
22.
Goffman, Erving.1997. The Goffman reader, ed. C. Lemert and A. Branaman.Cam-bridge, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Hammersley, M.1985. From ethnography to theory: A programme and paradigm in the sociology of education. Sociology19 (2): 244-59.
24.
Hammersley, Martyn.1992. What’s wrong with ethnography?London: Routledge.
25.
Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson.2007. Ethnography: Principles in practice . London: Routledge.
26.
James, Allison, and Alan Prout, eds. 1997. Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer.
27.
Maines, David.2001. The faultline of consciousness: A view of interactionism in sociology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28.
Manning, Philip.1992. Erving Goffman and modern sociology. London: Polity.
29.
Manning, Philip.2005. Reinvigorating the tradition of symbolic interactionism . Symbolic Interaction28 (2): 167-73.
30.
Pole, Christopher.2007. Researching children and fashion: An embodied ethnography . Childhood14 (1): 67-84.
31.
Pole, Christopher, and Marlene Morrison .2003Ethnography for education . Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
32.
Pope, Catherine.1995. Obituary: Philip Michael Strong. Network69 (1):9.
33.
Murcott, Anne, ed. 2006. Sociology and medicine: Selected essays by P. M. Strong. London: Ashgate.
34.
Rawls, Anne W.1987. The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory5 (2):136-49.
Strong, Philip.1983. The importance of being Erving: Erving Goffman 1922-1982 . Sociology of Health and Illness5:345-55.
38.
Strong, Philip.1988. Minor courtesies and macro structures. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, ed. Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton.Cam-bridge, UK: Polity.
39.
Strong, Philip. [ 1979] 2001. The ceremonial order of the clinic . London: Routledge.
40.
Verhoeven, Jef. [ 1980] 1993. An interview with Erving Goffman, 1980 . Research on Language and Social Interaction26 (3): 317-48.
41.
Weick, K.1976. Educational organizations and loosely coupled systems . Administrative Science Quarterly21 (1): 1-19.
42.
Williams, R.2007. Erving Goffman. In Key sociological thinkers , ed. R. Stones.London : Macmillan.
