In this article, acquired knowledge is considered as a temporary reflection that expresses the enactment of a social life that produces and reproduces social realities. Researchers need to engage with an open-ended process of de- and reconstruction of meanings between many players of the social world. As the poststructuralists Deleuze and Guattari reveal, our knowledge base is inherently trapped in lines of flight, on a voyage for which there pre-exists no map. For researchers involved with a reconstructive move, we explore and apply their concept of the map (cartography) as a potentially innovative methodological and analytical approach. Creating cartographies of the present allows researchers to deal with uncertainties, complexities and effects of surprise as participants in the production of knowledge, so to create sustainable and innovative understandings of situations and realities with research subjects.
Adams, N., T. Causey, M.-E. Jacobs, P. Munro, M. Quinn, and A. Trousdale.1998. Womentalkin’: A reader’s theatre performance of teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education11 (3): 383-95.
2.
Aspis, S.1997. Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: Does it have a future? Disability & Society12 (4): 647-54.
3.
Aspis, S.1999. What they don’t tell disabled people with learning difficulties. In Disability discourse, ed. M. Corker and S. French, 173-82. Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
4.
Atkinson, D., and J. Walmsley.1999. Using autobiographical approaches with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society14 (2): 203-16.
5.
Banister, E.M.1999. Evolving reflexivity: Negotiating meaning of women’s midlife experience. Qualitative Inquiry5:3-23.
Bertaux, D., and M. Kohli.1984. The life story approach: A continental view. Annual Review of Sociology10:215-37.
8.
Bogdan, R., and S.K. Biklen.1998. Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Booth, T.1996. Sounds of still voices: Issues in the use of narrative methods with people who have learning difficulties. In Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights, ed. L. Barton, 237-55. Essex, UK: Longman .
10.
Booth, T., and W. Booth.1996. Sounds of silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability & Society11 (1): 55-69.
11.
Braidotti, R.1994. Nomadic subjects.New York: Colombia University Press.
12.
Braidotti, R.2002. Metamorphoses. Towards a materialist theory of becoming . Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Braidotti, R.2006. Transpositions. On nomadic ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
Chappell, A.L.2000. Emergence of participatory methodology in learning difficulty research: Understanding the context. British Journal of Learning Disabilities28:38-43.
15.
Colebrook, C.2000. Introduction. In Deleuze and feminist theory , ed. I. Buchanan and C. Colebrook, 1-17. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Corker, M., and S. French , eds. 1999. Disability discourse. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
18.
Corker, M., and T. Shakespeare.2002. Disability/postmodernity. Embodying disability theory. London: Continuum .
19.
Davis, L.J.2002. Bending over backwards. Disability, dismodernism & other difficult positions. New York: New York University Press.
20.
De Bie, M., and H. van Ewijk.2008. Sociaal werk in Vlaanderen en Nederland: Een begrippenkader. Mechelen: Wolters Kluwer Belgium.
21.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari.1980/1987. A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia.London: Continuum.
22.
Denzin, N.K.1996. Interpretive ethnography. Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London: Sage.
23.
Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln.2003. The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues. London: Sage .
24.
Dybwad, G.1996. From feeblemindedness to self-advocacy: A half century of growth and self-fulfillment. European Journal of Mental Disability3 (11): 3-18.
25.
Dybwad, G., and H. Bersani.1996. New voices. Self-advocacy by people with disabilities.Cambridge, UK: Brookline Books.
26.
Ellis, C.2007. Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry13 (1): 3-29.
27.
Ellis, C., and A. Bochner.1996. Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
28.
Ferguson, P.2003. Winks, blinks, squints and twitches: Looking for disability and culture through my son’s left eye. In Rethinking disability. The emergence of new definitions, concepts and communities, ed. P. Devlieger, F. Rusch, and D. Pfeiffer, 131-47. Leuven , Belgium: Garant.
29.
Ferguson, P.M., and D.L. Ferguson.1995. The interpretivist view of special education and disability: The value of telling stories. In Disability and democracy. Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity, ed. T. M. Skrtic, 104-21. New York: Teachers College Press.
30.
Ferguson, P.M., D.L. Ferguson, and S. Taylor.1992. Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader.New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
Foucault, M.1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, ed. C. Gordon.New York: Pantheon.
32.
Foucault, M.1984. The Foucault reader, ed. P. Rabinow.New York: Pantheon .
33.
Gabel, S.2005. Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method. New York: Peter Lang.
34.
Galvin, R.2003. The paradox of disability culture: The need to combine versus the imperative to let go. Disability & Society18 (5): 675-90.
35.
Garland-Thomson, R.2005. Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30 (2): 1557-87.
36.
Gergen, K.J.1994. Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Gergen, M.M., and K.J. Gergen.2003. Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations . In The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues , ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 575-610. London: Sage.
38.
Goodley, D.2000. Self-advocacy in the lives of people with "learning difficulties ." Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
39.
Goodley, D.2001. "Learning difficulties," the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society16 (2): 207-31.
40.
Goodley, D., ed. 2004. Special issue: The place of people with "learning difficulties" in disability studies and research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities32 (2): 49-109.
41.
Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, P. Clough, and M. Moore.2004. Researching life stories. Method, theory and analyses in a biographical age. London: Routledge.
42.
Goodley, D., and G. Roets.2008. The (be)comings and goings of developmental disabilities: The cultural politics of "impairment." Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education29 (2): 241-57.
43.
Goodley, D., and G. Van Hove .2005. Another disability studies reader? People with learning difficulties and a disabling world. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
44.
Grosz, E.2005. Time travels. Feminism, nature power. London: Duke University Press. Haraway, D.1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature . London: Free Association Books .
45.
Heron, J., and P. Reason.1997. A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry3 (3): 274-94.
46.
Lather, P.1991. Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the post-modern. New York: Routledge .
47.
Lather, P.2005. The foundations/cultural studies nexus: An emerging movement in the education field (paper, American Educational Research Association, Montreal).
48.
Law, J., and J. Urry.2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society33 (3): 390-410.
49.
Ledger, S., and L. Tilley , eds. 2006. Special edition: The history of self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: International comparisons . British Journal of Learning Disabilities34 (3): 167-74.
50.
Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba.2003. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 253-91. London : Sage.
51.
Markula, P.2006. The dancing body without organs. Deleuze, femininity, and performing research. Qualitative Inquiry12 (1): 3-27.
52.
Meekosha, H.2006. What the hell are you? An intercategorical analysis of race, ethnicity, gender, and disability in the Australian body politic. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research8 (2-3): 161-76.
53.
Mutua, K., and B.B. Swadener.2004. Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts. Critical personal narratives.New York: State University of New York Press.
54.
Oliver, M.1996. A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights, ed. L. Barton, 18-42. Essex, UK: Longman.
55.
Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw.2002. One for all-All for one! A joint fight for our human rights. Antwerp, Belgium: Garant.
56.
Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw.2005. The master is known by his work: A master-piece. http://www.ont.be.
57.
Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw.2007. Wereldreizigers [The travelers]. http://www.ont.be/wereldreizigers .
58.
Parker, I.2003. Discursive resources in the discourse unit. Discourse Analysis Online1 (1), http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a2/parker2002001-t.html (accessed September 28, 2009)
59.
Potter, J.1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction . London: Sage.
60.
Roets, G., M. Adams, and G. Van Hove .2006. Challenging the monologue about silent sterilization. Implications for self-advocacy. British Journal of Learning Disabilities34 (3): 167-74.
61.
Roets, G., and M. Goedgeluck.2007. Daisies on the road. Tracing the political potential of our postmodernist feminist approach to life story research. Qualitative Inquiry13 (1): 58-84.
62.
Roets, G., D. Goodley, and G. Van Hove .2007. Narrative in a nutshell. Sharing hopes, fears and dreams with self-advocates. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities45 (5): 323-34.
63.
Roose, R., and M. De Bie.2003. From participative research to participative practice- A study in youth care. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology13 (6): 475-85.
64.
Schwandt, T.2003. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 292-331. London: Sage.
65.
Shank, G., and O. Villella.2004. Building on new foundations: Core principles and new directions for qualitative research. Journal of Educational Research98 (1): 46-55.
66.
Shildrick, M., and J. Price.2005/2006. Deleuzian connections and queer corporealities: Shrinking global disability. Rhizomes11/12. http://www.rhizomes.net/issue11/shildrickprice/index.html.
67.
Skrtic, T. M., ed. 1995. Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York: Teachers College Press.
68.
Smith, P.1999. Drawing new maps: A radical cartography of developmental disabilities. Review of Educational Research69 (2): 117-44.
Snyder, S.L., B.J. Brueggemann, and R. Garland-Thomson .2002. Disability studies: Enabling the humanities.New York: Modern Language Association of America.
71.
Snyder, S.L., and D.T. Mitchell.2006. Cultural locations of disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
St. Pierre, E.A.2004. Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory36 (3): 283-96.
73.
Tamboukou, M., and S. Ball.2003. Dangerous encounters. Genealogy & ethnography. New York: Peter Lang .
Taylor, S.J.2000. "You’re not a retard, you’re just wise": Disability, social identity, and family network. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography29 (1): 58-92.
76.
Tierney, W.G.1999. Introduction: Praxis at the millennium-epistemological authority, voice, and qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education12 (5): 451-56.
77.
Tierney, W.G.2002. Get real: Representing reality. Qualitative Studies in Education15 (4): 385-98.
78.
Tillmann-Healy, L.2003. Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry9 (5): 729-49.
79.
Traustadóttir, R.2006. Disability and gender: Introduction to the special issue . Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research8 (2-3): 81-83.
80.
Tremain, S.2005. Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction. In Foucault and the government of disability , ed. S. Tremain, 1-24. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
81.
Walmsley, J., and J. Downer.1997. Shouting the loudest: Self-advocacy, power and diversity. In Empowerment in everyday life. Learning disability, ed. P. Ramcharam, G. Roberts, G. Grant , and J. Borland, 35-47. London : Jessica Kingsley.
82.
Waugh, P.1998. Postmodernism and feminism. In Contemporary feminist theories, ed. S. Jackson and J. Jones, 177-93. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
83.
Williams, P., and B. Shoultz.1982. We can speak for ourselves. Self-advocacy by mentally handicapped people. London: Souvenir Press.
84.
Winance, M.2007a. Being normally different? Changes to normalization processes from alignment to work on the norm. Disability & Society22 (6): 625-38.
85.
Winance, M.2007b. How speaking shapes person and world: Analysis of the performativity of discourse in the field of disability. Social Theory & Health5:228-44.
