How do socioeconomic differences take on meaning in our daily interactions? Each morning for a summer I joined nine women in a coffee shop in a small rural town. In this public setting, I observed how women “do” class. During interaction, women use work, family, and leisure-related behaviors, values, and tastes associated with socioeconomic positions in the process of class categorization. No set hierarchy results from this process, however. Rather, what emerges from the Coffee Shop is that doing class involves an ongoing struggle to situate one’s own class category higher, not lower, than the others.
Anderson, Elijah. 1976. A place on the corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Blau, Peter M., and Otis Dudley Duncan. 1967. The American occupational structure. New York: Free Press.
3.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Brint, Steven. 1985. The political attitudes of professionals. Annual Review of Sociology11:389-414.
5.
Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza. 1997. The social and ideological bases of middle-class political realignment in the United States, 1972 to 1992. American Sociological Review62:191-208.
6.
Collins, Randall. 2000. Situational stratification: A micro-macro theory of inequality. Sociological Theory18:17-43.
7.
Daniels, Arlene. 1987. The hidden work of constructing class and community: Women volunteer leaders in social philanthropy. In Families and work, edited by N. Gerstel and H. E. Gross. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
Emerson, Robert, Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1987. Family and job for working-class women: Gender and class systems seen from below. In Families and work, edited by N. Gerstel and H. E. Gross. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Gubrium, John F., and James A. Holstein. 1997. The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Halle, David. 1984. America’s working man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Harris, Scott. 2003. Studying equality/inequality: Naturalist and constructionist approaches to equality in marriage. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32:200-232.
14.
Lamont, Michele. 1987. Cultural capital and the liberal political attitudes of professionals: Comment on Brint. American Journal of Sociology92:1501-1506.
15.
Ostrander, Susan. 1984. Women of the upper class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
Ragin, Charles C.1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Rosen, Ellen I.1987. Bitter choices: Blue-collar women in and out of work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Rubin, Lillian. 1976. Worlds of pain. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Rubin, Lillian. 1995. Families on the fault line. New York: Harper Perennial.
20.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1973. The theory of the leisure class. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Warner, W. Lloyd, and Paul S. Lunt. 1941. The social life of a modern community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Warner, W. Lloyd. 1942. The social status of a modern community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
West, Candace, and Sarah Fenstermaker. 1993. Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In Theory on gender/Feminism on theory, edited by P. England. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
