This article argues that focus group discussions are shaped by multiple social contexts, a fact that is often ignored by researchers. Using data from a focus group study of the effects of violence on everyday life, this article provides an analysis of four such contexts: the associational, status (especially gender), conversational, and relational contexts. These multiple and overlapping contexts foster both problematic silences (lack of disclosure) and problematic speech (strategic shaping of comments) in group discussions. These processes limit the usefulness of focus groups as a tool for understanding individual thoughts, feelings, or experiences. However, they make focus groups an excellent site for analyzing the processes of social interaction. The article concludes with suggestions for improving the implementation and interpretation of focus groups in light of this analysis.
Agar, Michael, and James MacDonald. 1995. Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization54:78-86.
2.
Albrecht, T. L., G. M. Johnson, and J. B. Walther. 1993. Understanding communication processes in focus groups. In Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, edited by D. L. Morgan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Aronson, Elliot, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, J. Merrill Carlsmith, and Marti Hope Gonzales. 1990. Methods of research in social psychology.2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Asch, S.1956. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs70 (Whole No. 416).
5.
Barbour, Rosaline S., and Jenny Kitzinger. 1999. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
6.
Berger, Joseph, M. Hamit Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and Morris Zelditch, Jr.1977. Status characteristics in social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.
7.
Berliner, Paul F. [1978] 1993. The soul of mbira: Music and traditions of the Shona people of Zimbabwe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1995. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics-1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
9.
Carey, M. A.1995. Comment: Concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Health Research5:487-495.
10.
Connell, R. W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Craven, D.1994. Sex differences in victimization, 1994 (NCJ-164508). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
12.
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah, Anne Kerr, and Stephen Pavis. 1999. Theorizing subjects and subject matter in focus group research. In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
13.
Currie, D.H., and B. D. MacLean. 1997. Measuring violence against women: The interview as a gendered social encounter. In Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives, edited by M. D. Schwartz. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Bruce Williams. 1994. The method is the message: Focus groups as a method of social, psychological, and political inquiry. Research in Micropolitics4:57-85.
15.
Fox, Greer Litton. 1977. “Nice girl”: Social control of women through a value construct. Signs2:805-817.
16.
Frith, Hannah. 2000. Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities3:275-297.
17.
Gamson, William A.1992. Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Gergen, Kenneth J.1991. The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Gergen, Mary M., and Kenneth J. Gergen. 1984. The social construction of narrative accounts. In Historical social psychology, edited by K. J. Gergen and M. M. Gergen. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Glassner, Barry. 1999. The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goodey, Jo.1997. Boys don’t cry: Masculinities, fear of crime and fearlessness. British Journal of Criminology37:401-418.
24.
Gordon, Margaret T., and Stephanie Riger. 1989. The female fear: The social cost of rape. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Green, Judith, and Laura Hart. 1999. The impact of context on data. In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
26.
Green, Gill, Rosaline S. Barbour, Marina Barnard, and Jenny Kitzinger. 1993. “Who wears the trousers?” Sexual harassment in research settings. Women’s Studies International Forum16:627-637.
27.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1994. The commercial spirit of intimate life and the abduction of feminism: Signs from women’s advice books. Theory, Culture, and Society11:1-24.
28.
Hollander, Jocelyn A. 1997. Discourses of danger: The construction of gender through talk about violence. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington.
29.
Hollander, Jocelyn A.2001. Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender & Society15:84-110.
30.
Janis, I.1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
Johnson, Alan. 1996. “It’s good to talk”: The focus group and the sociological imagination. The Sociological Review44:517-538.
32.
Jordin, M., and R. Brunt. 1988. Constituting the television audience: A problem of method. In Television and its audience, edited by P. Drummond and R. Paterson. London: British Film Institute.
33.
Kimmel, Michael. 1993. Clarence, William, Iron Mike, Tailhook, Senator Packwood, Spur Posse, Magic... and us. In Transforming a rape culture, edited by E. Buchwald, P. R. Fletcher, and M. Roth. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Milkweed.
34.
Kitzinger, Jenny. 1994a. Focus groups: Method or madness? In Challenge and innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS, edited by M. Boulton. London: Taylor & Francis.
35.
Kitzinger, Jenny. 1994b. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness16:103-121.
36.
Kitzinger, Jenny, and Rosaline S. Barbour. 1999. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
37.
Knodel, John. 1993. The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, edited by D. L. Morgan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Krueger, Richard A.1993. Quality control in focus group research. In Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, edited by D. L. Morgan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Krueger, Richard A., and Mary Anne Casey. 2000. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 1990. Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 1996. Focus groups in communication and media research. Journal of Communication42:78-87.
42.
Madriz, Esther I.1998. Using focus groups with lower socioeconomic status Latina women. Qualitative Inquiry4:114-128.
43.
Manfredi, Clara, Loretta Lacey, Richard Warnecke, and George Balch. 1997. Method effects in survey and focus group findings: Understanding smoking cessation in low-SES African American women. Health Education & Behavior24:786-800.
44.
Martin, Patricia Yancey, and Robert A. Hummer. 1989. Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender & Society3:457-473.
45.
Matoesian, Gregory M., and J. R. Coldren. 2002. Language and bodily conduct in focus group evaluations of legal policy. Discourse & Society13:469-493.
46.
Merton, Robert K., Marjorie Fiske, and Patricia L. Kendall. [1956] 1990. The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. 2nd ed.New York: The Free Press.
47.
Michell, Lynn. 1999. Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is; telling how it feels. In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
48.
Montell, Frances. 1999. Focus group interviews: A new feminist method. NWSA Journal11:44-71.
49.
Morgan, David L.1988. Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Morgan, David L.. 1995. Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research5:516-523.
51.
Morgan, David L.. 1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology22:129-152.
52.
Morgan, David L.. 2001. Focus group interviewing. In Handbook of interview research: Context and method, edited by J.F. Gubrium and J.A. Holstein. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Morgan, David L., and Richard A. Krueger. 1993. When to use focus groups and why. In Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, edited by D. L. Morgan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Myers, Greg. 1998. Displaying opinions: Topic and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society27:85-111.
55.
Myers, Greg, and Phil Macnaghten. 1999. Can focus groups be analysed as talk? In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
56.
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
57.
Puchta, C., and Jonathan Potter. 2002. Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation. British Journal of Social Psychology41:345-363.
58.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L.1993. Gender, status, and the social psychology of expectations. In Theory on gender/feminism on theory, edited by P. England. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
59.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1999. The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology25:191-216.
60.
Sasson, Theodore. 1995. Crime talk: How citizens construct a social problem. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
61.
Sheffield, Carole J.1987. Sexual terrorism: The social control of women. In Analyzing gender, edited by B. B. Hess and M. M. Ferree. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
Skrypnek, Berna J., and Mark Snyder. 1982. On the self-perpetuating nature of stereo-types about men and women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18:277-291.
63.
Solano, Cecilia H.1988. The interactive perspective: Getting the social back into social psychology. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality3:35-44.
64.
Stewart, David W., and Prem N. Shamdasani. 1990. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
Sussman, S., D. Burton, C. W. Dent, A. W. Stacy, and B. R. Flay. 1991. Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collective norm effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology21:1772-1782.
66.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t understand! Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
67.
Ullman, Sarah E.1996. Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly20:505-526.
68.
Ward, Victoria M., Jane T. Bertrand, and Lisanne F. Brown. 1991. The comparability of focus group and survey results: Three case studies. Evaluation Review15:266-283.
69.
Wellings, Kaye, Patrick Branigan, and Kirsti Mitchell. 2000. Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: Using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality2:255-267.
70.
West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1:125-151.
71.
Wight, Daniel. 1994. Boys’ thoughts and talk about sex in a working class locality of Glasgow. Sociological Review42:703-737.
72.
Wilkinson, Sue. 1998a. Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum21:111-125.
73.
Wilkinson, Sue. 1998b. Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. Journal of Health Psychology3:329-338.
74.
Wilkinson, Sue. 1999. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
