Drawing on interviews conducted with fifty-one single mothers in a rural state, this article explores how women who rely on state assistance sustain a belief in their own self-worth. The article first shows that single mothers hold firmly to the value of self-sufficiency. It then shows that they can hold to that value because they believe that their welfare reliance is different from that of other women and because they redefine independence to allow for acts that might normally be understood to challenge that norm. The findings are compared to those in other studies that cover some of the same issues. The discussion draws on three levels of context for interpreting the findings: the current discourse concerning single mothers and, more specifically, welfare recipients; the client stance that develops among those who deal with bureaucracies; and, finally, the interview situation itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, Mimi
. 1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston: South End.
2.
Annie E. Casey Foundation
. 2000. 2000 kids count data online. Available from www.aecf.org.
3.
Bellah, Robert
, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Bloom, Dan
, Charles Michalopoulos, Johanna Walter, and Patricia Auspos. 1998. WRP: Implementation and early impacts of Vermont's welfare restructuring project. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
5.
Bock, Jane D.2000. Doing the right thing? Single mothers by choice and the struggle for legitimacy. Gender & Society14:62-86.
6.
Briar, Scott
. 1966. Welfare from below: Recipients' view of the public welfare system. In The law of the poor, edited by Jacobus Ten Broek, 370-385. San Francisco: Chandler.
7.
Brown, Carol
. 1981. Mothers, fathers and children: From private to public patriarchy. In Women and revolution, edited by Lydia Sargent, 239-267. Boston: South End.
8.
Burns, Ailsa
, and Cath Scott. 1994. Mother-headed families and why they have increased. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cohen, Jodi R.1997. Poverty: Talk, identity, and action. Qualitative Inquiry3:71-92.
10.
Coontz, Stephanie
. 1992. The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Davies, Linda
, and Prue Rains. 1995. Single mothers by choice?Families in Society76:543-550.
12.
Davis, Liane V.
, and Jan L. Hagen. 1996. Stereotypes and stigma: What's changed for welfare mothers. Affilia11:319-337.
13.
Dill, Bonnie Thornton
, and Bruce B. Williams. 1992. Race, gender, and poverty in the rural South: African American single mothers. In Rural poverty in America, edited by Cynthia M. Duncan, 97-109. New York: Auburn House.
14.
Edin, Kathryn
, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage.
15.
Epstein, William M.1997. Welfare in America: How social science fails the poor. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Fave, L. Richard Della.1980. The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of stratification. American Sociological Review45:955-971.
17.
Ferguson, Kathy E.1984. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18.
Fine, Michele. 1992. Reconciling voices of hope and despair. Grant proposal to the Spencer Foundation.
19.
Fontana, Andrea
. 1977. The last frontier: The social meaning of growing old. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Fraser, Nancy
. 1990. Struggle over needs: Outline of a socialist-feminist critical theory of late-capitalist political culture. In Women, the state and welfare, edited by Linda Gordon, 199-225. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21.
Gilens, Martin
. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Goodban, Nancy
. 1985. The psychological impact of being on welfare. Social Service Review59:403-422.
23.
Hertz, Rosanna
, and Faith I. T. Ferguson. 1997. Kinship strategies and self-sufficiency among single mothers by choice: Post modern family ties. Qualitative Sociology20:187-209.
24.
Institute for Women's Policy Research
. 1998. State of the states: Vermont. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
25.
Jones, Edward E.
, and Richard E. Nisbett. 1972. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, edited by Edward E. Jones et al., 79-94. New York: General Learning Press.
26.
Kerbo, Harold R.1976. The stigma of welfare and a passive poor. Sociology and Social Research60:173-187.
27.
Kitchel, M. Jane
. 1998. Fourth annual report to the General Assembly on Vermont's welfare restructuring project. Waterbury, VT: Agency of Human Services.
28.
Lichter, Daniel T.
, and David J. Eggebeen. 1993. Rich kids, poor kids: Changing income inequality among American children. Social Forces71:761-780.
29.
Lichter, Daniel T.
, and Diane K. McLaughlin. 1997. Welfare and the rise in female-headed families. American Journal of Sociology103:112-143.
30.
Livingston, Joy
, and Elaine McCrate. 1993. Women and economic development in Vermont: A study for the Governor's Commission on Women. Montpelier, VT: Governor's Commission on the Status of Women.
31.
McGranahan, David A.1994. Rural America in the global economy: Socioeconomic trends. Journal of Research in Rural Education10:139-148.
32.
Murray, Charles
. 1984. Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Nelson, Margaret K.
, and Joan Smith. 1999. Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Neubeck, Kenneth J.
, and Noel A. Cazenave. 2001. Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America's poor. New York: Routledge.
35.
Rains, Prue
, Linda Davies, and Margaret McKinnon. 1998. Taking responsibility: An insider view of teen motherhood. Families in Society79:308-319.
36.
Rosier, Katherine Brown
. 2000. Mothering inner-city children: The early school years. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37.
Seccombe, Karen
, Delores James, and Kimberly Battle Walters. 1998. “They think you ain't much of nothing”: The social construction of the welfare mother. Journal of Marriage and the Family60:849-865.
38.
Sevenhuijsen, S.1998. Citizenship and the ethic of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. New York: Routledge.
39.
Snow, David A.
, and Leon Anderson. 1987. Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology92:1335-1371.
40.
Snow, David A.
, and Leon Anderson. 1993. Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Stacey, Judith
. 1994. The new family values crusaders: Dan Quayle's revenge. The Nation259:119-122.
42.
Stack, Carol
. 1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row.
43.
Tickamyer, Ann R.
, Debra A. Henderson, Julie Anne White, and Barry L. Tadlock. 2000. Voices of welfare reform: Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants. Affilia15:173-192.
44.
Tronto, Joan
. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
45.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 2001. Characteristics and financial circumstances of TANF recipients: Fiscal year 1999. Available from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/characteristics/fy99/analysis.htm.
46.
Whitehead, Barbara Defoe
. 1993. Dan Quayle was right. Atlantic Monthly271:47-53.
47.
Wong, L. Mun
. 1998. The ethics of rapport: Institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal. Qualitative Inquiry4:178-199.
