Abstract
In this article, the author discusses some of the methodological implications of conducting long-distance ethnographic research. The author suggests that while distance is not without its advantages (such as helping the researcher maintain novelty and/or feign ignorance when appropriate), it also poses serious challenges (e.g., cutting the researcher off from his or her support network and/or imposing an “unnaturally” restrictive timetable). In this light, distance might best be seen as a potential tool in the researcher's toolkit. The article concludes by situating long-distance ethnography in the tradition of voluntary risk taking or “edgework.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
