Bonds, J. 1995. The victimization of Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom in Updike's tetralogy: Critical life review in the context of American education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
2.
Clay, M.
1993. Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Clifford, J.
1988. The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Dippo, D.1990. Stravinsky's rag.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education3:185-188.
5.
Goetz, E.
, and B. Armbruster. 1980. Psychological correlates of text structure. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, edited by R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer, 201-220. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Howe, K.1988. Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard.Educational Researcher17:10-16.
7.
Johnson, D.
, R. Johnson, and E. Holubec. 1994. The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning.Edina, MN: Interaction.
8.
King, J.
, and W. Brozo. 1992. Critical literacy and pedagogies of empowerment. In Using inquiry in reading education, edited by A. Frager and J. Miller, 33-40. Pittsburg, KS: College Reading Association.
9.
Lather, P.1999. To be of use: The work of reviewing.Review of Educational Research69:2-7.
10.
McGuire, M.
1990. The rhetoric of narrative: A hermeneutic, critical theory. In Narrative thought and narrative language, edited by B. Britton and A. Pellegrini, 219-236. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Natriello, G.2000. For the record: Reviewing books.Teachers College Record102:1-4.
12.
Short, R.
, B. Frye, S. Homan, and J. King. 1995. Accelerated Literacy Learning: A successful early intervention program for at-risk first grade readers.Florida Reading Quarterly31:13-18.
13.
Slavin, R.
1994. Using student team learning.4th ed.Baltimore: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
14.
Smith, J.1983. Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue.Educational Researcher12:6-13.
15.
Smith, J.
, and L. Heshusius. 1986. Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational researchers.Educational Researcher15:4-12.
16.
Spivey, N.
1997. The constructivism metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning.New York: Academic Press.
17.
Spivey, N.
, and J. King. 1994. Readers as writers composing from sources. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, edited by R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, and H. Singer, 668-694. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
Tierney, R.
, and Shanahan, T. 1991. Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In Handbook of reading research, edited by R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, and P. D. Pearson. Vol. 2, pp. 246-280. New York: Longman.
19.
Van Maanen, J.
1995. An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In Representation in ethnography, edited by J. Van Maanen, 1-35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Van Maanen, J.
1988. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
