This study examines the social meaning of disability and the construction of social identity in a family whose members, as well as numerous kin and friends, have been officially defined as handicapped, disabled, or mentally retarded. As a point of departure for examining family members' perspectives, this article briefly reviews the literature on disability and stigma. In contrast to current theories, the family in this study has constructed a life world in which disability is not stigmatizing or problematic for their identities. This article examines, in depth, how family members and their broader social network construct the meaning of disability labels in nonstigmatizing ways and define themselves and each other in terms of their personal characteristics and family relationships. The conclusion of this article considers some factors that seem to account for the family's ability to avoid the stigma and stained identities associated with mental retardation and other disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angrosino, M. V.1992. Metaphors of stigma: How deinstitutionalized mentally retarded adults see themselves.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography21:171-199.
2.
Angrosino, M. V.
1998. Opportunity house: Ethnographic stories of mental retardation.Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
3.
Becker, H. S.
1963. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance.New York: Free Press.
4.
Bercovici, S. M.
1983. Barriers to normalization.Baltimore: University Park Press.
5.
Bogdan, R.
, and S. J. Taylor. 1976. The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation.American Psychologist31:447-452.
6.
Bogdan, R.
, and S. J. Taylor. 1987. Toward a sociology of acceptance: The other side of the study of deviance.Social Policy18:34-39.
7.
Bogdan, R.
, and S. J. Taylor. 1989. Relationships with severely disabled people: The social construction of humanness.Social Problems36:135-148.
8.
Bogdan, R.
, and S. J. Taylor. 1994. The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
Braginsky, D.
, and B. Braginsky. 1971. Hansels and Gretels.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
Coleman, L. M.
1997. Stigma: An enigma demystified. In The disability studies reader, edited by L. J. Davis, 216-231. New York: Routledge.
11.
Davis, F.1961. Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped.Social Problems9:120-132.
12.
Davis, F.1974. Stories and sociology.Urban Life and Culture, 3 (October): 310-316.
13.
Davis, L. J.
1997. Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the Nineteenth century. In The disability studies reader, edited by L. J. Davis, 1-28. New York: Routledge.
14.
DeVault, M. L.
1991. Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Dow, G. S.
1920. Society and its problems: An introduction to the principles of sociology.New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
16.
Dugdale, R. L.
1910. The Jukes.New York: Putnam.
17.
Edgerton, R. B.
1986. A case of delabeling: Some practical and theoretical implications. In Culture and retardation: Life histories of mildly mentally retarded persons in American society, edited by L. L. Langness and H. Levine, 101-126. Boston: D. Reidel.
18.
Edgerton, R. B.
1993. The cloak of competence revised and updated.Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Edgerton, R. B.
, and S. Bercovici. 1976. The cloak of competence: Years later.American Journal of Mental Deficiency80:485-497.
20.
Edgerton, R. B.
, M. Bollinger, and B. Herr. 1984. The cloak of competence: After two decades.American Journal of Mental Deficiency88:345-351.
21.
Estroff, S. E.
1981. Making it crazy: An ethnography of psychiatric clients in an American community.Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Garfinkel, H.
1967. Studies in ethnomethodology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Goddard, H. H.
1912. The Kallikaks: A study in the heredity of feeblemindedness.New York: Macmillan.
24.
Goffman, E.
1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Goode, D.
1994. A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
Gould, S. J.
1981. The mismeasure of man.New York: Norton.
27.
Gubrium, J. F.1986. The social preservation of mind: The Alzheimer's disease experience.Symbolic Interaction9:37-51.
28.
Gubrium, J. F.
, and J. A. Holstein. 1990. What is family?Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
29.
Herman, N. J.
, and G. R. Musolf. 1998. Resistance among ex-psychiatric patients: Expressive and instrumental rituals.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography26:426-449.
30.
Hertz, R.
, and F.I.T. Ferguson. 1997. Kinship strategies and self-sufficiency among single mothers by choice: Post modern family ties.Qualitative Sociology20:187-209.
31.
Hess, R. D.
, and G. Handel. 1995. Family worlds: A psychosocial approach to family life.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
32.
Higgins, P.
1980. Outsiders in a hearing world.Berkeley: Sage.
33.
Katz, J.
1983. A theory of qualitative methodology: The social science system of analytic fieldwork. In Contemporary field research, edited by R. M. Emerson, 127-148. Boston: Little, Brown.
34.
Langness, L. L.
, and H. G. Levine. 1986. Culture and retardation: Life histories of mildly mentally retarded persons in American society.Boston: D. Reidel.
35.
Link, B. G.
, E. L. Struening, M. Rahav, J. C. Phelan, and L. Nuttbrock. 1997. On stigma and its consequences: Evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse.Journal of Health and Social Behavior38:177-190.
36.
Mercer, J.
1973. Labeling the mentally retarded.Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Miles, M. B.
, and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Mintz, S.
, and S. Kellogg. 1988. Domestic revolutions: A social history of American family life.New York: Free Press.
39.
Murphy, R.
1990. The body silent.New York: Norton.
40.
Pollner, M.
, and L. McDonald-Wikler. 1985. The social construction of unreality: A case study of a family's attribution of competence to a severely retarded child.Family Process24:241-254.
41.
Reiss, D.
1981. The family's construction of reality.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42.
Rochelle, A. R.
1997. No more kin: Exploring race, class, and gender in family networks.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Scheff, T.
1966. Being mentally ill.Chicago: Aldine.
44.
Schneider, J. W.
, and P. Conrad. 1983. Having epilepsy: The experience and control of illness.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
45.
Schur, E. M.
1971. Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications.New York: Harper & Row.
46.
Scott, R.
1969. The making of blind men.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
Stack, C.
1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community.New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Taylor, S. J. 1977. The custodians: Attendants and their work at state institutions for the mentally retarded. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
49.
Taylor, S. J.1987. “They're not like you and me”: Institutional attendants' perspectives on residents.Child & Youth Services8:109-125.
50.
Taylor, S. J.
1998. “Children's Division is coming to take pictures”: Life in a family with mental retardation and disabilities. In Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource, 3d ed., edited by S. J. Taylor and R. Bogdan, 221-241. New York: John Wiley.
51.
Taylor, S. J.
, and Bogdan, R.1989. On accepting relationship between people with mental retardation and non-disabled people: Towards an understanding of acceptance.Disability, Handicap & Society4:21-36.
52.
Taylor, S. J.
, and Bogdan, R. 1998. Introduction to qualitative research: A guidebook and resource, 3d ed.New York: John Wiley.
53.
Whyte, S. R.
, and B. Ingstad. 1995. Disability and culture: An overview. In Disability and culture, edited by B. Ingstad and S. R. Whyte, 3-32. Berkeley: University of California Press.
