Abstract
It is unknown whether a user's understanding of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) is related to its successful use. A study of 876 LAM users in Pakistan and the Philippines collected information about women's understanding of LAM. The present analysis aims to determine: (1) the proportion of LAM users who understand the method, (2) whether any known factors can distinguish those who understand LAM from those who do not, and (3) whether an understanding of LAM is related to subsequent pregnancy. Over 75% of LAM users could consistently recite the LAM guidelines correctly for a full year postpartum. However, 38% of users failed to display, at least once, an understanding of LAM during the first year postpartum mainly by failing to abstain, to use another method or to explain their nonuse of another method when their LAM protection expired. LAM understanding generally could not be predicted by sociodemographic factors. The occurrence of pregnancy during the first year postpartum was not related to LAM understanding, regardless of how LAM understanding was defined, nor could it be predicted by any other measured characteristic of the users.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
