Human Milk Donation and Human Milk Banking from the Perspective of Fathers: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Spanish

Background and Aim:

Most research on human milk donation and human milk banking has focused on mothers, while fathers’ perspectives remain insufficiently explored. Although mothers may be willing to donate milk or use donor milk for their own infants, these decisions are often shaped by their spouses’ viewpoints. This study aimed to explore fathers’ views on human milk donation and human milk banking.

Methods:

This qualitative study used an inductive thematic analysis approach. Data were collected between August and December 2024 through semi-structured interviews with 20 fathers who brought their infants for routine checkups at a state hospital in Türkiye via semi-structured interviews and a descriptive form. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. MAXQDA software was used during the analysis process.

Results:

Five main themes with 10 subthemes were identified. Fathers’ perspectives reflected a balance between perceived benefits of donor human milk for infants in need and concerns related to religious beliefs, milk kinship, hygiene, and trust. Acceptance of donor milk use for their own infants was conditional and depended on hygienic handling, professional supervision, and transparency regarding donor information. Fathers expressed divided opinions about allowing their wives to donate milk, and views on establishing human milk banks in Türkiye ranged from acceptance to conditional acceptance or rejection.

Conclusion:

Fathers’ perspectives on human milk donation and milk banking are shaped by the interplay between infant benefits and religious, cultural, and hygiene concerns. Spouses’ attitudes and approval regarding milk donation are important family factors influencing decisions about human milk donation.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

breastfeeding fathers human milk banking infant feeding milk donation perspectives qualitative study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akman Dömbekci

Erişen

M. A

. (2022). Interview technique in qualitative research. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 22, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227330

Atkinson

Silverio

S. A.

Bick

Fallon

(2021). Relationships between paternal attitudes, paternal involvement, and infant-feeding outcomes: Mixed-methods findings from a global online survey of English-speaking fathers. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17, Article e13147. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13147

Baltacı

(2018). A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 7, 231–274.

Bradshaw

Atkinson

Doody

(2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/233339361774228

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Chang

F. Y.

Cheng

S. W.

T. Z.

Fang

L. J.

(2013). Characteristics of the first human milk bank in Taiwan. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 54, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.11.004

Copland

Noble-Carr

Carroll

Waldby

(2025). Rethinking men’s grief: A case study of bereaved fathers’ involvement in lactation and human milk donation after infant loss. Men and Masculinities, 28(5), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X251327420

Doshmangir

Naghshi

Gholipour

Ahmadi

Azizi

Gordeev

V. S.

(2025). Factors influencing breast milk donation to a human milk bank in Iran: Implications for policymakers and planners. BMC Nutrition, 11(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-00994-7

Doshmangir

Naghshi

Khabiri

(2019). Factors influencing donations to human milk bank: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Breastfeeding Medicine, 14, 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0002

10.

Erenel

Ünal Toprak

Gölbaşı

Pelit Aksu

Arslan Gürcüoğlu

Uçar

Vural

(2017). A multicenter study for the determination of health care staff’s knowledge and views about breast milk banks. Gazi Medical Journal, 28, 107–111.

11.

Halcomb

E. J.

Davidson

P. M.

(2006). Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Applied Nursing Research, 19, 38–42.

12.

Karacan

Çelikkanat

Ş.

Güngörmüş

(2024). Beliefs and views of breastfeeding mothers regarding human milk banking: A qualitative study. Nutrition, 119, Article 112299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112299

13.

Kilci Erciyas

Ş.

Özsavran

Ayyıldız

. (2021). Views of postnatal mothers regarding human milk banking. Medical Journal of Western Black Sea, 5, 435–443. https://doi.org/10.29058/mjwbs.893944

14.

Kuckartz

Rädiker

(2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer.

15.

Kuluçtu

Özerdoğan

(2017). Breast milk bank. Manisa CBU Journal of Institute of Health Science, 4, 593–596.

16.

H. L.

Fan

Kwok

J. Y.

Fong

D. Y.

Lok

K. Y. W.

(2024). Unveiling the voices: Exploring perspectives and experiences of women, donors, recipient mothers and healthcare professionals in human milk donation: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Women Birth, 37, Article 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101644

17.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427

18.

Mampane

Wolvaardt

J. E.

(2024). The acceptability of a donor human milk bank and donated human milk among mothers in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 20, Article e13651. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13651

19.

Mathias

E. G.

Patil

D. S.

Kolakemar

Krishnan

J. B.

Renjith

Gudi

Swamy

R. S.

Brand

(2023). Barriers and facilitators for the donation and acceptance of human breast milk: A scoping review. Current Nutrition Reports, 12, 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-023-00506-8

20.

Mӧrelius

Brogren

Andersson

Alehagen

(2021). Fathers’ experiences of feeding their extremely preterm infants in family-centred neonatal intensive care: A qualitative study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 16(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00394-0

21.

Mukembo

Bukenya

Benon

Dorren

(2021). Perceived father’s roles in promotion of breastfeeding at household level: Case study of fathers in Amuru District Northern Uganda. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 37(1), 29005-29009. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2021.37.005931

22.

Nguyen

T. T.

Huynh

N. L.

Becker

Tran

H. T.

Cashin

Mathisen

(2025). Views on wet nursing and expressing breastmilk for sharing and human milk bank donation among mothers in two parenting social media communities in Vietnam. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 21, Article e13694. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13694

23.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13.

24.

O’Brien

B. C.

Harris

I. B.

Beckman

T. J.

Reed

D. A.

Cook

D. A

. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research. Academic Medicine, 89, 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

25.

Obeng

Jackson

Amissah-Essel

Nsiah-Asamoah

Perry

C. A.

Gonzalez Casanova

Obeng-Gyasi

(2023). Women’s perspectives on human milk banking in Ghana: Results from a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1128375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128375

26.

Ouyang

Y. Q.

Wang

S. Y.

Huang

Zhang

Wang

Yue

S. W.

Redding

S. R.

(2025). Chinese postpartum mothers’ views on donor milk and human milk banking: A qualitative study. Midwifery, 146, Article 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2025.104408

27.

Pramono

Hikmawati

(2024). Donor human milk practice in Indonesia: A media content analysis. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11, Article 1442864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1442864

28.

Ramachandran

Dahlui

Nik Farid

N. D.

(2024). Motivators and barriers to the acceptability of a human milk bank among Malaysians. PLoS One, 19, Article e0299308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299308

29.

Saunders

Sim

Kingstone

Baker

Waterfield

Bartlam

Burroughs

Jinks

(2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

30.

Sherriff

Hall

Panton

(2014). Engaging and supporting fathers to promote breastfeeding: A concept analysis. Midwifery, 30, 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.014

31.

Simal Yavuz

Ozerdogan

. (2024). How should father support be in breastfeeding?: A systematic review. Zenodo, 4, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10976093

32.

Sürmeli

Vefikuluçay Yılmaz

(2023). Knowledge and opinions of Turkish parents about the human milk bank. Mediterranean Nursing and Midwifery, 3(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.4274/MNM.2022.22116

33.

Weaver

Bertino

Gebauer

Grovslien

Mileusnic-Milenovic

Arslanoglu

Barnett

Boquien

C.-Y.

Buffin

Gaya

Moro

G. E.

Wesolowska

Picaud

J.-C.

(2019). Recommendations for the establishment and operation of human milk banks in Europe: A consensus statement from the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA). Frontiers in Pediatrics, 7, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00053

34.

World Health Organization. (2022). Call for authors–Systematic reviews on donor human milk banking processes. https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/call-for-authors-systematic-reviews-on-donor-human-milk-banking-processes

35.

World Health Organization. (2023). Infant and young child feeding. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding

36.

Yaşar

Ö.

Çevik

Dokuzcan

D. A

. (2023). An nursing and midwifery students’ opinions about breast milk banking. Journal of Health Professionals Research, 5, 124–129.

37.

Zhang

J. Y.

Liu

X. W.

Jiang

Y. L.

Redding

S. R.

Ouyang

Y. Q.

(2020). Factors associated with postpartum women’s knowledge, attitude and practice regarding human milk banks and milk donation: A cross-sectional survey. Midwifery, 91, Article 102837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102837

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB