Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

One of the obstacles to breastfeeding is the false beliefs in society about human milk and breastfeeding.

Research Aim:

The aim of this study is to develop the “Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale” and test its validity and reliability.

Methods:

This methodological study included 326 participants (individuals in the last trimester of pregnancy and breastfeeding individuals with infants aged 0–2 years) recruited from two public hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey. Data were collected using the Descriptive Participant Data Form and the Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale. Reliability analyses included internal consistency and a test–retest assessment conducted at a 2-week interval (n = 34). The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines, and a pilot test was conducted with 10 participants.

Results:

The draft scale initially consisted of 32 items and was evaluated by experts. Following exploratory factor analysis, eight items with low factor loadings were removed, and content validity was supported using the Lawshe technique. The final 24-item scale demonstrated a structure with two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 and a dominant first factor, with good internal consistency (α = .86).

Conclusion:

The Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale demonstrated acceptable validity evidence and good reliability, and may be used to assess beliefs related to breastfeeding myths.

Keywords

breastfeeding breastfeeding barriers breastfeeding knowledge breastfeeding myths cultural norms human milk instrument development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acheampong

A. K.

Abukari

A. S.

(2024). Myths about breastfeeding as voiced by lactating nurses and midwives: A qualitative study at the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. SAGE Open Nursing, 10, 23779608231226068. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231226068

Aksu

Küçük

Düzgün

(2011). The effect of postpartum breastfeeding education/support provided at home three days after birth on breastfeeding duration and knowledge: A randomized study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 24(2), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.497569

Ayre

Scally

A. J.

(2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808

Balogun

O. O.

Dagvadorj

Anigo

K. M.

Ota

Sasaki

(2015). Factors influencing breastfeeding exclusivity during the first 6 months of life in developing countries: A quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 11(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12131

Batuk

(2009). Notes on the problem of myth, history, and reality. Milel ve Nihal, 6(1), 27-53. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milel/issue/

Baykul

(2015). Measurement in education and psychology: Classical test theory and applications. Pegem Akademi.

Boateng

G. O.

Neilands

T. B.

Frongillo

E. A.

Melgar-Quiñonez

H. R.

Young

S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

DeVellis

R. F.

(2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Nobel Publishing.

10.

Dixson

A. F.

Dixson

B. J.

(2011). Venus figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of fertility or attractiveness? Journal of Anthropology, 2011, Article 569120. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/569120

11.

Drohan

Faustini

(2019). For every child, answers 2019. United Nations Children’s Fund Office of Research–Innocenti. https://www.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/For-every-child-answers-2019.pdf

12.

Gölbaşı

Eroğlu

Kaya

(2018). Determination of postpartum women’s belief in breast milk and breastfeeding myths. Kocaeli University Journal of Health Sciences, 4(2), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.402892

13.

Kılıç

(2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47–48. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823

14.

Lawshe

C. H.

(1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

15.

Meek

J. Y.

Noble

(2022). Policy statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 150(1), https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057988

16.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

17.

Tavşancıl

(2019). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Publishing

18.

Thompson

(2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. Guilford Press.

19.

Timurturkan

(2020). Biopower, nutrition, and motherhood: Cultural and political aspects of breastfeeding. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 219–248. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusosyoloji/issue/56274/778377

20.

Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS). (2018). Turkey demographic and health survey report. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development & TÜBİTAK. https://hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tr/2018_tnsa_analiz_ve_rapor-56

21.

Ursachi

Horodnic

I. A.

Zait

(2015). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9

22.

Vandenbroucke

J. P.

Von Elm

Altman

D. G.

Gøtzsche

P. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Pocock

S. J.

Poole

Schlesselman

J. J.

Egger

(2014). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. International Journal of Surgery, 12(12), 1500–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

23.

World Health Organization. (2014). Global nutrition targets 2025: Stunting policy brief. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-14.3

24.

Yelsouei

A. J.

Taşğın

Z. D. Ü

. (2025). The effects of pregnant women’s breastfeeding myths on their breastfeeding self-efficacy: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 25(1), 609. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07738-2

25.

Yılar

. (2005). Myth, legend, and education. Atatürk University Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education Journal, 11, 383–392. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunikkefd/issue/2772/37093

26.

Yılmaz Sezer

Aker

M. N.

Gönenç

İ. M.

Topuz

. (2024). Development of the breastfeeding myths scale. Breastfeeding Medicine, 19(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2023.0160

27.

Yüksel

Yılmaz

H. B.

(2021). The place of breastfeeding and breast milk in the historical process. İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 6(1), 71–76. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ikcusbfd/issue/60165/671086

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale: Development,Validity,and Reliability Study