Breastfeeding offers well-documented short- and long-term benefits for both infants and mothers, yet Malta lags behind national targets. Only 46.3% of Maltese infants are exclusively breastfed at hospital discharge, and fewer than 10% continue exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months. Determinants of breastfeeding in Malta are not well understood.
Research Aim:
This study aimed to explore the perspectives of Maltese mothers during the early postpartum period to identify factors influencing the initiation, continuation, and cessation of breastfeeding.
Method:
An exploratory-descriptive qualitative design was employed. Thirteen recently postpartum mothers attending the Breastfeeding Clinic at Mater Dei Hospital were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews, conducted face-to-face or online, explored reasons for continuation or discontinuation of breastfeeding; experiences of breastfeeding; and perceptions around improvements needed to support breastfeeding in Malta. Audio/video files were transcribed and analyzed thematically.
Results:
Three overarching themes emerged: (1) internal factors, including maternal determination, perceived benefits, doubts in self-efficacy, and pain; (2) external influences, including family, partners, public perceptions, and healthcare professional advice; and (3) demand for appropriate support, including workplace accommodations, tailored education, and community resources. Maternal determination and supportive healthcare guidance facilitated breastfeeding, whereas inconsistent advice, social pressures, and insufficient workplace policies hindered it.
Conclusion:
Breastfeeding practices in Malta are limited by systemic, cultural, and practical barriers. Interventions that strengthen maternal self-efficacy, provide consistent professional support, foster familial and societal acceptance, and enhance policy support for parental leave and workplace accommodations may improve breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration.
AsimakiE.DaglaM.SarantakiA.IliadouM. (2022). Main biopsychosocial factors influencing breastfeeding: A systematic review. Maedica, 17(4), 955–962. http://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.955
2.
Attard MontaltoS.BorgH.Buttigieg-SaidM.ClemmerE. J. (2010). Incorrect advice: The most significant negative determinant on breast feeding in Malta. Midwifery, 26(1), e6–e13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.06.002
BorgH. (2024). Breastfeeding clinic database 2024. Outpatients Department, Mater Dei Hospital.
5.
BorgK. (2018). The measurement of breast-feeding indicators in the Maltese population [Doctoral dissertation, University of Malta]. University of Malta Open Access Repository. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/34222
6.
BreeR. T.GallagherG. (2016). Using Microsoft Excel to code and thematically analyse qualitative data: A simple, cost-effective approach. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 8(2), 2811. http://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v8i2281
7.
ChangY. S.LiK. M. C.LiK. Y. C.BeakeS.LokK. Y. W.BickD. (2021). Relatively speaking? Partners’ and family members’ views and experiences of supporting breastfeeding: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1827), 20200033. https://doi.org/10.1098/.rstb.2020.0033
8.
CharantimathU.BelladR.MajantashettiN.WashioY.DermanR.KellyP. J.ShortV.ChungE.GoudarS. (2020). Facilitators and challenges to exclusive breastfeeding in Belagavi District, Karnataka, India. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0231755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231755
9.
ChengL. Y.WangX.MoP. K. H. (2019). The effect of home-based intervention with professional support on promoting breastfeeding: A systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 64, 999–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01266-5
DaouD.TamimH.NabulsiM. (2020). Assessing the impact of professional lactation support frequency, duration and delivery form on exclusive breastfeeding in Lebanese mothers. PLOS ONE, 15(9), Article e0238735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238735
Farrugia ZahraL. (2019). Comparison of prevalence and reasons behind current breastfeeding practices in Malta & Gozo (Diploma dissertation, University of Malta). University of Malta Open Access Repository. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45915
15.
FreyL. R. (1994). The naturalistic paradigm: Studying small groups in the postmodern era. Small Group Research, 25(4), 551–577. https://dot.org/10.1177.1046496494254008
16.
FrońA.Orczyk-PawiłowiczM. (2024). Breastfeeding beyond six months: Evidence of child health benefits. Nutrients, 16, Article 3891. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223891
17.
FukuiN.MategiT.WatanbeY.HashijiriK.TsubayaR.OgawaM.SugaiT.EgawaJ.EnomotoT.SomeyaT. (2021). Exclusive breastfeeding is not associated with maternal-infant bonding in early postpartum, considering depression, anxiety and parity. Nutrients, 13, Article 1184. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041184
18.
GianniM. L.BettinelliM. E.ManfraP.SorrentinoG.BezzeE.PlevaniL.CavallaroG.RaffaeliG.CrippaB. L.ColomboL.MorniroliD.LiottoN.RoggeroP.VillamorE.MarchisioP.MoscaF. (2019). Breastfeeding difficulties and risk for early breastfeeding cessation. Nutrients, 11(10), Article 2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102266
GrantA.PellB.CopelandL.BrownA.EllisR.MorrisD.WilliamsD.PhillipsR. (2022). Views and experience of breastfeeding in public: A qualitative systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 18(4), Article e13407. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13407
22.
HadisuyatmanaS.HasE. M. M.SebayangS. K.EfendiF.AstutikE.KuswantoH.Arizona TriandanaI. K. L. (2021). Women’s empowerment and determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding: A scoping review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 56, e77–e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.08.004
23.
HastingsG.AngusK.EadieD.HuntK. (2020). Selling second best: How infant formula marketing works. Globalization and Health, 16(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00597-w
24.
HauckY. L.BlixtaI.HildingssonI.GallagherL.RubersstonC.ThomsonB.LewisL. (2016). Australian, Irish and Swedish women’s perceptions of what assisted them to breastfeed for six months: An exploratory design using critical incident technique. BMC Public Health, 16, Article 1067. https://doi.org/10/1186/s22889=016-3740-3
Hernández-CorderoS.Lozada-TequeanesA. L.Fernández-GaxiolaA. C.Shamah-LevyT.SachseM.VelizP.Cosío-BarrosoI. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding during the immediate and one-month postpartum periods, among Mexican women: A mixed methods approach. International Breastfeeding Journal, 15, 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00327-3
28.
HunterD.McCallumJ.HowesD. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1), 1–8. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/180272/7/180272.pdf
29.
KehindeJ.O’donnellC.GrealishA. (2023). The effectiveness of prenatal breastfeeding education on breastfeeding uptake postpartum: A systematic review. Midwifery, 118, Article 103579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103579
30.
MalekiA.FaghihzadehE.YousefluS. (2021). The effect of educational intervention on improvement of breastfeeding self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2021, Article 5522229. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522229
31.
MichalopoulouS.GarciaA. L.WolfsonL.WrightC. M. (2023). Does planning to mixed feed undermine breastfeeding?Maternal Child Nutrition, 20, Article e13610. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13610
32.
ModakA.RongheV.GomaseK. P.DukareK. P. (2023). The psychological benefits of breastfeeding: fostering maternal well-being and child development. Cureus, 15(10), Article e46730. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46730
33.
MorrisonA. H.GentryR.AndersonJ. (2019). Mothers’ reasons for early breastfeeding cessation. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 44(6), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000556
34.
Navarro-RosenblattD.GarmendiaM. L. (2018). Maternity leave and its impact on breastfeeding: A review of the literature. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(9), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2018.013
35.
Parnis IgnjatovicJ.JonesP. (2024). Maternal influences on breastfeeding and weaning practices in Malta. Malta Journal of Health Sciences, 11(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.14614/BREASTFEED/11/24
36.
Pérez-EscamillaR.TomoriC.Hernández-CorderoS.BakerP.BarrosA. J.BéginF.ChapmanD.Grummer-StrawnL.McCoyDMenonP.Ribeiro NevesP.PiwozE.RollinsN.VictoraC.RichterL. (2023). Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. The Lancet, 401(10375), 472–485.
37.
QiaoJ.DaiL. J.ZhangQ.OuyangY. Q. (2020). A meta-analysis of the association between breastfeeding and early childhood obesity. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 53, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.024
38.
RitoA. I.BuoncristianoM.SpinelliA.SalanaveB.KunešováM.HejgaardT.García SolanoM.FijałkowskaA.SturuaL.HyskaJ.KelleherC. (2019). Association between characteristics at birth, breastfeeding and obesity in 22 countries: The WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative–COSI 2015/2017. Obesity Facts, 12(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500425
39.
RothM. C.HumphreysK. L.KingL. S.GotlibI. H.RobakisT. K. (2021). Breastfeeding difficulties predict mothers’ bonding with their infants from birth to age six months. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 25, 777–785. https/doi.org/10/1007/s10995-020-03036-9
40.
RothsteinJ. D.WinchP. J.PachasJ.CabreraL. Z.OchoaM.GilmanR. H.CaulfieldL. E. (2021). Vulnerable families and costly formula: A qualitative exploration of infant formula purchasing among peri-urban Peruvian households. International Breastfeeding Journal, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10/1186/s13006-021-00356-6
41.
StordalB. (2022). Breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer: A call for action in high-income countries with low rates of breastfeeding. Cancer Medicine, 12, 4616–4625. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5288
42.
TerryG.HayfieldN.ClarkeV.BraunV. (2017). Thematic analysis. In WilligC.Stainton RogersW. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17–37). Sage. https://org/10.4125/9781526405555.n2
VanderlindenK.BuffelV.Van de PutteB.Van de VeldeS. (2020). Motherhood in Europe: An examination of parental leave regulations and breastfeeding policy influences on breastfeeding initiation and duration. Social Sciences, 9(12), Article 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9120222
46.
Vilar-CompteM.Hernández-CorderoS.Ancira-MorenoM.Burrola-MéndezS.Ferre-EguiluzI.OmañaI.Perez NavarroC. (2021). Breastfeeding at the workplace: A systematic review of interventions to improve workplace environments to facilitate breastfeeding among working women. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01432-3
47.
WongM. S.MouH.ChienW. T. (2021). Effectiveness of educational and supportive intervention for primiparous women on breastfeeding related outcomes and breastfeeding self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 117, Article 103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103874
ZhouQ.ChenH.YoungerK. M.CassidyT. M.KearnyJ. M. (2020). “I was determined to breastfeed and I always found a solution”: Successful experiences of exclusive breastfeeding among Chinese mothers in Ireland. International Breastfeeding Journal, 15(47), 1–10. https://doi.org/doi:10.1186/s13006=020-00292-x
