Abstract
Positionality and reflexivity are increasingly recognized as essential practices that enhance the rigor, transparency, and ethical integrity of research. Although these concepts are often associated with qualitative studies, they are equally relevant in quantitative and mixed methods approaches. In this article, we define positionality and reflexivity and describe the relationship between these concepts. We also provide three strategies for understanding one’s positionality and practicing reflexivity—identity mapping, reflexive journaling, and bracketing—and consider how each method can be applied across different research designs and throughout the research process. We conclude with practical guidance and examples for how to communicate these practices through positionality statements. By explicitly acknowledging positionality and adopting reflexive practices, researchers can better manage assumptions and biases, strengthen credibility and trustworthiness, and promote equity and inclusivity in knowledge production.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
