The staff of maternity hospitals play an essential role in the start of breastfeeding. This study assessed specific aspects of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals using the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Research Aim:
To identify specific hospital practices and structures that are in compliance with the recommendations and those that still need to be improved.
Method:
A cross-sectional survey and descriptive analysis was conducted in 109 German hospitals. This web-based questionnaire examined the structural conditions and usual handling of breastfeeding support. Recommendations were reported using sub-criteria.
Results:
The implementation of the sub-criteria ranged from less than 25% to more than 90%. Hospitals were more likely to have a breastfeeding policy (85.3%, n = 93) than a breastfeeding coordinator (73.4%, n = 80). Immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth and early breastfeeding initiation were implemented more frequently after a vaginal (89.9%, n = 98 and 71.6%, n = 78) than after Cesarean delivery (45.9%, n = 50 and 54.1%, n = 59). Additional feeding of fluids was usually restricted to a medical indication (70.6%, n = 77), however, the decision to feed formula was rarely made by hospital staff alone (27.5%, n = 30). Large hospitals (> 1000 births/year) had a written breastfeeding policy and a breastfeeding coordinator more frequently than smaller hospitals (p < 0.01, Fisher’s exact test).
Conclusion:
The use of sub-criteria of WHO recommendations helped identify critical parts of breastfeeding promotion in hospitals, providing concrete starting points for targeted interventions. This differentiated approach could be promising for future analyses of breastfeeding promotion.
AlakaamA.LemacksJ.YadrickK.ConnellC.ChoiH. W.NewmanR. G. (2018). Breastfeeding practices and barriers to implementing the ten steps to successful breastfeeding in Mississippi hospitals. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(2), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417737294
2.
BatistaC. L. C.RibeiroV. S.NascimentoM. D. D. S. B.RodriguesV. P. (2018). Association between pacifier use and bottle-feeding and unfavorable behaviors during breastfeeding. Jornal de Pediatria, 94(6), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2017.10.005
3.
BrettschneiderA. K.WeikertC.AbrahamK.PrützF.von der LippeE.LangeC. (2016). Stillmonitoring in Deutschland – Welchen Beitrag können die KiGGS-Daten leisten? [Breastfeeding monitoring in Germany – What contribution can KiGGS data provide?]. Journal of Health Monitoring, 1(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2016-038
4.
BrettschneiderA.K.von der LippeE.LangeC. (2018). Stillverhalten in Deutschland – Neues aus KiGGS Welle 2. [Breastfeeding behaviour in Germany-News from KiGGS Wave 2]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, 61, 920–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2770-7
Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung [Federal Office for Food and Agriculture]. (2024). Healthy Start – Young Family Network - Materialien: Für die Beratung von Eltern zum Stillen [Materials: For counseling parents on breastfeeding]. Retrieved August 28, 2024, from https://www.gesund-ins-leben.de/fuer-fachkreise/gesund-leben-in-der-stillzeit/materialien/
ChenC.YanY.GaoX.XiangS.HeQ.ZengG.LiuS.ShaT.LiL. (2018). Influences of cesarean delivery on breastfeeding practices and duration: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(3), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417741434
10.
Deutscher Bundestag [German Bundestag]. (2023). Sozialgesetzbuch. (SGB) Fünftes Buch (V) - Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung - (Artikel 1 des Gesetzes v. 20. Dezember 1988, BGBl. I S. 2477) [Social Code. (SGB) 5th Book (V) - Statutory Health Insurance - (Article 1 of the Act of December 20, 1988, BGBl. I p. 2477]. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_5/SGB_5.pdf
Forschungsdepartment Kinderernährung [Research Department of Child Nutrition]. (2020). Abschlussbericht. Studie zur Erhebung von Daten zum Stillen und zur Säuglingsernährung in Deutschland – SuSe II [Final report. Study to collect data on breastfeeding and infant feeding in Germany - SuSe II]. Available on request.
13.
GavineA.MacGillivrayS.RenfrewM. J.SiebeltL.HaggiH.McFaddenA. (2017). Education and training of healthcare staff in the knowledge, attitudes and skills needed to work effectively with breastfeeding women: A systematic review. International Breastfeeding Journal, 12, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0097-2
14.
Gesellschaft für Qualität in der außerklinischen Geburtshilfe e.V. [Society for Quality in Out-of-Hospital Obstetrics e.V.]. (2023). Geburtenzahlen in Deutschland [Birth rates in Germany]. Retrieved August 28, 2024, from https://www.quag.de/quag/geburtenzahlen.htm
15.
Gölİ (2018). Antenatal care and breastfeeding. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 12(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.432466
16.
HakalaM.KaakinenP.KääriäinenM.BloiguR.HannulaL.EloS. (2021). Maternity ward staff perceptions of exclusive breastfeeding in Finnish maternity hospitals: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Midwifery, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/134846
17.
Hoang NguyenP. T.BinnsC. W.Vo Van HaA.NguyenC. L.Khac ChuT.DuongD. V.DoD. V.LeeA. H. (2020). Caesarean delivery associated with adverse breastfeeding practices: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 40(5), 644–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1647519
18.
HockampN.BurakC.SieversE.RudloffS.BurmannA.ThinnesM.ZahnJ.LückeT.KerstingM. (2021). Breast-feeding promotion in hospitals and prospective breast-feeding rates during the first year of life in two national surveys 1997-1998 and 2017-2019 in Germany. Public Health Nutrition, 24(9), 2411–2423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021001099
19.
HockampN.SieversE.HülkP.RudolfH.RudloffS.LückeT.KerstingM. (2022). The role of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals for exclusive breastfeeding duration. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 18(2), Article e13326. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13326
20.
HongT. M.CallisterL. C.SchwartzR. (2003). First-time mothers’ views of breastfeeding support from nurses. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 28(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200301000-00004
21.
IngramJ.JohnsonD.CondonL. (2011). The effects of Baby Friendly Initiative training on breastfeeding rates and the breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge and self-efficacy of community health-care staff. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 12(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423610000423
22.
KaunonenM.HannulaL.TarkkaM. T. (2012). A systematic review of peer support interventions for breastfeeding. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(13–14), 1943–1954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04071.x
23.
KerstingM.HockampN.BurakC.LückeT. (2020). Studie zur Erhebung von Daten zum Stillen und zur Säuglingsernährung in Deutschland – SuSe II [Study to collect data on breastfeeding and infant nutrition in Germany – SuSe II]. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (Ed): 14. DGE Ernährungsbericht. Vorveröffentlichung Kapitel 3 [German Nutrition Society (DGE), ed. 14th DGE Nutrition Report. Pre-Publication Chapter 3]. https://www.dge.de/fileadmin/dok/wissenschaft/ernaehrungsberichte/14eb/14-DGE-EB-Vorveroeffentlichung-Kapitel3.pdf
24.
KohlhuberM.RebhanB.SchweglerU.KoletzkoB.FrommeH. (2008). Breastfeeding rates and duration in Germany: A Bavarian cohort study. British Journal of Nutrition, 99(5), 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508864835
25.
KronborgH.FoverskovE.NilssonI.MaastrupR. (2017). Why do mothers use nipple shields and how does this influence duration of exclusive breastfeeding?Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(1), Article e12251. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12251
26.
KruskeS.SchmiedV.CookM. (2007). The “Earlybird” gets the breastmilk: Findings from an evaluation of combined professional and peer support groups to improve breastfeeding duration in the first eight weeks after birth. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 3(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00078.x
27.
LevittC.HanveyL.KaczorowskiJ.ChalmersB.HeamanM.BartholomewS. (2011). Breastfeeding policies and practices in Canadian hospitals: Comparing 1993 with 2007. Birth, 38(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00479.x
28.
LevittC. A.KaczorowskiJ.HanveyL.AvardD.ChanceG. W. (1996). Breast-feeding policies and practices in Canadian hospitals providing maternity care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 155(2), 181–188.
29.
LubbeW.ten Ham-BaloyiW. (2017). When is the use of pacifiers justifiable in the baby-friendly hospital initiative context? A clinician’s guide. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), Article 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1306-8
Pérez-EscamillaR.MartinezJ. L.Segura-PérezS. (2016). Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 12(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12294
33.
RasenackR.SchneiderC.JahnzE.Schulte-MöntingJ.PrömpelerH.KunzeM. (2012). Einflussfaktoren auf die Stilldauer im Freiburger Geburtenkollektiv (FreiStill) [Factors Associated with the Duration of Breastfeeding in the Freiburg Birth Collective, Germany (FreiStill)]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde [Obstetrics Gynecology], 72(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1280470
34.
RosinS. I.Zakarija-GrkovićI. (2016). Towards integrated care in breastfeeding support: A cross-sectional survey of practitioners’ perspectives. International Breastfeeding Journal, 11, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0072-y
35.
SchmiedV.GribbleK.SheehanA.TaylorC.DykesF. C. (2011). Ten steps or climbing a mountain: A study of Australian health professionals’ perceptions of implementing the baby friendly health initiative to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. BMC Health Services Research, 11, Article 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-208
36.
SieversE.WeikertC.WeißenbornA.KerstingM. (2018). Stillmonitoring in Deutschland – aktueller Handlungsbedarf und Perspektiven [Monitoring breastfeeding in Germany—The current need for action and perspectives]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforsch – Gesundheitsschutz [Federal Health Bulletin – Health Research – Health Protection], 61, 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2772-5
37.
SpaethA.ZempE.MertenS.DratvaJ. (2018). Baby-Friendly Hospital designation has a sustained impact on continued breastfeeding. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(1), Article e12497. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12497
38.
TongunJ. B.TumwineJ. K.NdeeziG.SebitM. B.MukunyaD.NankundaJ.TylleskarT. (2019). The effect of health worker training on early initiation of breastfeeding in south Sudan: A hospital-based before and after study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), Article 3917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203917
39.
Verein zur Unterstützung der WHO/UNICEF-Initiative “Babyfreundlich” (BFHI) e. V. [Association for the Support of the WHO/UNICEF Initiative “Baby-Friendly” e.V.]. (2017). Jahresbericht WHO/UNICEF-Initiative“Babyfreundlich” [Annual Report of the WHO/UNICEF Initiative “Baby-Friendly”].
40.
VictoraC. G.BahlR.BarrosA. J. D.FrançaG. V. A.HortonS.KrasevecJ.MurchS.SankarM. J.WalkerN.RollinsN. C., & Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet, 387, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7
41.
von der LippeE.BrettschneiderA. K.GutscheJ.Poethko-MüllerC., & KiGGS Study Group. (2014). Einflussfaktoren auf Verbreitung und Dauer des Stillens in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Studie – Erste Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1) [Factors influencing the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding in Germany. Results of the KiGGS study: first follow up (KiGGS Wave 1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 57, 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-1985-5
42.
WaltersD. D.PhanL. T. HMathisenR. (2019). The cost of not breastfeeding: Global results from a new tool. Health Policy and Planning, 34(6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz050
World Health Organization, & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2018). Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services: Implementing the revised Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative 2018. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513807
48.
Zakarija-GrkovićI.CattaneoA.BettinelliM. E.PilatoC.VassalloC.Borg BuontempoM.GrayH.MeynellC.WiseP.HarutyunyanS.RosinS.HemmelmayrA.Šniukaitė-AdnerD.ArendtM.GuptaA. (2020). Are our babies off to a healthy start? The state of implementation of the Global strategy for infant and young child feeding in Europe. International Breastfeeding Journal, 15(1), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00282-z
49.
ZhangK.TangL.WangH.QiuL. Q.BinnsC. W.LeeA. H. (2015). Why do mothers of young infants choose to formula feed in China? Perceptions of mothers and hospital staff. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(5), 4520–4532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120504520
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
