Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program.

Research Aims:

(1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program.

Method:

This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites.

Results:

Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: t (189) = −6.55, p < 0.001, and after the baby was born: t (170) = −2.59, p = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: F (7,352) = 12.75, p < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: F (7,352) = 7.83, p < 0.001.

Conclusion:

Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.

Keywords

breastfeeding breastfeeding promotion breastfeeding support program infants and children peer support social support Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

M. S.

Iliescu

Greiff

(2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699

Awaliyah

S. N.

Rachmawati

I. N.

Rahmah

(2019). Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a dominant factor affecting maternal breastfeeding satisfaction. BMC Nursing, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0359-6

Baño-Piñero

Martínez-Roche

M. E.

Canteras-Jordana

Carrillo-García

Orenes-Piñero

(2018). Impact of support networks for breastfeeding: A multicentre study. Women and Birth, 31(4), e239–e244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.10.002

Beauregard

J. L.

Hamner

H. C.

Chen

Avila-Rodriguez

Elam-Evans

L. D.

Perrine

C. G.

(2019). Racial disparities in breastfeeding initiation and duration among US infants born in 2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(34), 745–748. http://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6834a3

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carlson

Neuberger

(2021). WIC works: Addressing the nutrition and health needs of low-income families for more than four decades. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Updated January 27, 2021. https://www.cbpp.org/wicworks

Chiang

K. V.

Anstey

E. H.

Perrine

C. G.

(2021). Racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding initiation—United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(21), 769–774. http://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7021a1

Clark

Baker

S. S.

McGirr

Harris

(2018). Breastfeeding peer support program increases breastfeeding duration rates among middle- to high-income women. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(2), 112–115.

Connell

Carlton

Grundy

Buck

E. T.

Keetharuth

A. D.

Ricketts

Barkham

Robotham

Rose

Brazier

(2018). The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: Lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL). Quality of Life Research, 27(7), 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y

10.

Eldridge

J. D.

Hartnett

J. O.

Lee

F. F.

Sekhobo

J. P.

Edmunds

L. S.

(2017). Implementing a WIC-based intervention to promote exclusive breastfeeding: Challenges, facilitators, and adaptive strategies. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 49(7), S177–S185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.04.005

11.

Emmott

E. H.

Page

A. E.

Myers

(2020). Typologies of postnatal support and breastfeeding at two months in the UK. Social Science & Medicine, 246(February), Article 112791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112791

12.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

13.

Gago

Colchamiro

May

Rimm

E. B.

Kenney

E. L.

(2022). Caregivers’ perceived impact of WIC’s temporary cash-value benefit (CVB) increases on fruit and vegetable purchasing, consumption, and access in Massachusetts. Nutrients, 14(23), Article 4947. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14234947

14.

Grimes

H. A.

Forster

D. A.

Shafiei

Amir

L. H.

McLardie-Hore

McLachlan

H. L.

(2020). Breastfeeding peer support by telephone in the RUBY randomised controlled trial: A qualitative exploration of volunteers’ experiences. PLOS ONE, 15(8), Article e0237190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237190

15.

Haile

Z. T.

(2023). Power analysis and exploratory research. Journal of Human Lactation, 39(4), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231195625

16.

Harari

Rosenthal

M. S.

Bozzi

Goeschel

Jayewickreme

Onyebeke

Griswold

Perez-Escamilla

(2018). Feasibility and acceptability of a text message intervention used as an adjunct tool by WIC breastfeeding peer counsellors: The LATCH pilot. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(1), Article e12488. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12488

17.

Hornsby

P. P.

Gurka

K. K.

Conaway

M. R.

Kellams

A. L.

(2019). Reasons for early cessation of breastfeeding among women with low income. Breastfeeding Medicine, 14(6), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2018.0206

18.

Kline

Zvavitch

Wroblewska

Worden

Mwombela

Thorn

(2022). WIC participant and program characteristics 2020. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved December 18, 2022, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/participant-program-characteristics-2020-charts

19.

Labbok

M. H.

Starling

(2012). Definitions of breastfeeding: Call for the development and use of consistent definitions in research and peer-reviewed literature. Breastfeeding Medicine, 7(6), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2012.9975

20.

Lau

C. Y.

Lok

K. Y.

Tarrant

(2018). Breastfeeding duration and the theory of planned behavior and breastfeeding self-efficacy framework: A systematic review of observational studies. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2453-x

21.

Law

K. H.

Dimmock

J. A.

Guelfi

K. J.

Nguyen

Bennett

Gibson

Tan

X. H.

Jackson

(2021). A peer support intervention for first-time mothers: Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the mummy buddy program. Women and Birth, 34(6), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.009

22.

Perrine

C. G.

Anstey

E. H.

Chen

MacGowan

C. A.

Elam-Evans

L. D.

(2019). Breastfeeding Trends by Race/Ethnicity Among US Children Born from 2009 to 2015. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(12), Article e193319. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3319

23.

Maleki-Saghooni

Amel Barez

Karimi

F. Z.

(2020). Investigation of the relationship between social support and breastfeeding self-efficacy in primiparous breastfeeding mothers. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 33(18), 3097–3102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1568986

24.

Mercan

Tari Selcuk

(2021). Association between postpartum depression level, social support level and breastfeeding attitude and breastfeeding self-efficacy in early postpartum women. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249538

25.

Mickens

A. D.

Modeste

Montgomery

Taylor

(2009). Peer support and breastfeeding intentions among black WIC participants. Journal of Human Lactation, 25(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334409332438

26.

Moon

Woo

(2021). An integrative review on mothers’ experiences of online breastfeeding peer support: Motivations, attributes and effects. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(3), Article e13200. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13200

27.

Quinn

E. M.

Gallagher

de Vries

(2019). A qualitative exploration of breastfeeding support groups in Ireland from the women's perspectives. Midwifery, 78(November), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.001

28.

Robinson

VandeVusse

Foster

(2016). Reactions of low-income African American women to breastfeeding peer counselors. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 45(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.011

29.

Schindler-Ruwisch

Roess

Robert

R. C.

Napolitano

Woody

Thompson

Ilakkuvan

(2019). Determinants of breastfeeding initiation and duration among African American DC WIC recipients: Perspectives of recent mothers. Women’s Health Issues, 29(6), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.003

30.

Snyder

Hulse

Dingman

Cantrell

Hanson

Dinkel

(2021). Examining supports and barriers to breastfeeding through a socio-ecological lens: A qualitative study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00401-4

31.

Tseng

J. F.

Chen

S. R.

H. K.

Chipojola

Lee

G. T.

Lee

P. H.

Shyu

M. L.

Kuo

S. Y.

(2020). Effectiveness of an integrated breastfeeding education program to improve self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding rate: A single-blind, randomised controlled study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 111 (November), Article 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103770

32.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Methods: Breastfeeding rates. https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/nis_data/methods.html

33.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. (n.d. -a). About WIC breastfeeding support and formative research findings. WIC Breastfeeding Support. Retrieved June 26, 2024, from https://wicbreastfeeding.fns.usda.gov/about-wic-breastfeeding-support-and-formative-research-findings

34.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. (n.d.-b). National and state estimates of WIC eligibility and program reach in 2021. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved November 2, 2023, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/wic/eligibility-and-program-reach-estimates-2021

35.

Vieira

E. S.

Caldeira

N. T.

Eugênio

D. S.

Lucca

M. M.

Silva

I. A.

(2018). Breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum depression: A cohort study. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 26(September), Article e3035. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2110.3035

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding

Abstract

Background:

Research Aims:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material