AşcıÖ.Demirgöz BalM.ErginA. (2021). The breastfeeding experiences of COVID-19-positive women: A qualitative study in Turkey. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, e12453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12453
3.
BazzanoA. N.KajiA.Felker-KantorE.BazzanoL. A.PottsK. S. (2017). Qualitative studies of infant and young child feeding in lower-income countries: A systematic review and synthesis of dietary patterns. Nutrients, 9(10), 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9101140
4.
BenchimolE. I.SmeethL.GuttmannA.HarronK.HemkensL. G.MoherD.PetersenI.SørensenH. T.von ElmE.LanganS. M., & RECORD Working Committee. (2016). [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]. Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen, 115–116, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2016.07.010
5.
BossM.TurnerJ.BossP.HartmannP.PritchardD.CliffordR. (2021). Integrating approaches for quality guideline development in LactaMap, an online lactation care support system. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03775-9
6.
BossuytP. M.ReitsmaJ. B.BrunsD. E.GatsonisC. A.GlasziouP. P.IrwigL. M.LijmerJ. G.MoherD.RennieD.de VetH. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. British Medical Journal, 326(7379), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41
7.
BrettJ.StaniszewskaS.SimeraI.SeersK.MockfordC.GoodladS.AltmanD.MoherD.BarberR.DenegriS.EntwistleA. R.LittlejohnsP.MorrisC.SulemanR.ThomasV.TysallC. (2017). Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: Methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines. BMJ Open, 7(10), e016948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016948
8.
BuccheriR. K.SharifiC. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12258
9.
ChanA.-W.TetzlaffJ. M.GøtzscheP. C.AltmanD. G.MannH.BerlinJ. A.DickersinK.HróbjartssonA.SchulzK. F.ParulekarW. R.Krleza-JericK.LaupacisA.MoherD. (2013). SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ, 346, e7586. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586
10.
Channell DoigA.JasczynskiM.FleishmanJ. L.AparicioE. M. (2020). Breastfeeding among mothers who have experienced childhood maltreatment: A review. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(4), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420950257
11.
ChesnelM. J.HealyM.McNeillJ. (2021). The experiences of trained breastfeeding support providers that influence how breastfeeding support is practised: A protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254445
12.
ChetwyndE. M.WasserH. M.PooleC. (2019). Breastfeeding support interventions by International Board Certified Lactation Consultants: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419851482
13.
ChiesaC.PacificoL.OsbornJ. F.BonciE.HoferN.ReschB. (2015). Early-onset neonatal sepsis: Still room for improvement in procalcitonin diagnostic accuracy studies. Medicine, 94(30), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001230
14.
CroweM.SheppardL. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008
Dall’OglioI.MarchettiF.MascoloR.AmadioP.GawronskiO.ClementeM.DottaA.FerroF.GarofaloA.SalvatoriG.TarantinoA.TiozzoE.GiustiA. (2020). Breastfeeding protection, promotion, and support in humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(4), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419900151
17.
DangD.DearholtS. L.BissettK.AscenziJ.WhalenM. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines. (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.
18.
Des JarlaisD. C.LylesC.CrepazN., & TREND Group. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.361
19.
EmaryP. C.StuberK. J.MbuagbawL.OremusM.NoletP. S.NashJ. V.BaumanC. A.CiracoC.CoubanR. J.BusseJ. W. (2021). Quality of reporting in chiropractic mixed methods research: A methodological review protocol. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00395-0
20.
EysenbachG. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
21.
FairF. J.MorrisonA.SoltaniH. (2021). The impact of Baby-Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(4), e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13216
22.
GagnierJ. J.KienleG.AltmanD. G.MoherD.SoxH.RileyD., & CARE Group. (2013). The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. Journal of Dietary Supplements, 10(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2013.830679
23.
GallegosD.ParkinsonJ.DuaneS.DomeganC.JansenE.Russell-BennettR. (2020). Understanding breastfeeding behaviours: A cross-sectional analysis of associated factors in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Australia. International Breastfeeding Journal, 15(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00344-2
24.
HassenH. Y.GebreyesusS. H.EndrisB. S.RoroM. A.Van GeertruydenJ.-P. (2020). Development and validation of a risk score to predict low birthweight using characteristics of the mother: Analysis from BUNMAP Cohort in Ethiopia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5), E1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051587
25.
HellerR. F.VermaA.GemmellI.HarrisonR.HartJ.EdwardsR. (2008). Critical appraisal for public health: A new checklist. Public Health, 122(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.012
26.
HigginsJ. P. T.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C.JüniP.MoherD.OxmanA. D.SavovicJ.SchulzK. F.WeeksL.SterneJ. A. C., Cochrane Bias Methods Group, & Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
27.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM.WelchV. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of Iinterventions. Wiley-Blackwell.
28.
Hubschman-ShaharL. E. (2021). Lactation telehealth in primary care: A systematic review. Breastfeeding Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0105
29.
HudaM. H.ChipojolaR.LinY. M.LeeG. T.ShyuM.-L.KuoS.-Y. (2021). The influence of breastfeeding educational interventions on breast engorgement and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Human Lactation. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344211029279
Iglesias-RosadoB.Leon-LariosF. (2021). Breastfeeding experiences of Latina migrants living in Spain: A qualitative descriptive study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 16(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00423-y
32.
JohnsonH. M.EglashA.MitchellK. B.LeeperK.SmillieC. M.Moore-OstbyL.MansonN.SimonL., & Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. (2020). ABM Clinical Protocol #32: Management of hyperlactation. Breastfeeding Medicine. 15(3), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.29141.hmj
33.
KatrakP.BialocerkowskiA. E.Massy-WestroppN.KumarS.GrimmerK. A. (2004). A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-22
34.
KhoranaM.WongsinP.TorbunsupachaiR.KanjanapattanakulW. (2021). Effect of domperidone on breast milk production in mothers of sick neonates: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Breastfeeding Medicine, 16(3), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2020.0234
35.
KottnerJ.AudigéL.BrorsonS.DonnerA.GajewskiB. J.HróbjartssonA.RobertsC.ShoukriM.StreinerD. L. (2011). Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
36.
LeeA. H. X.WenB.HocaloskiS.SandholdtN.HultlingC.ElliottS. L.KrassioukovA. V. (2019). Breastfeeding before and after spinal cord injury: A case report of a mother with C6 tetraplegia. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(4), 742–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419844234
37.
LiuF.ChenX.NieP.LinS.GuoJ.ChenJ.YuL. (2021). Can tai chi improve cognitive function? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2021.0084
38.
LongH. A.FrenchD. P.BrooksJ. M. (2020). Optimizing the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632084320947559
39.
McFaddenA.SiebeltL.MarshallJ. L.GavineA.GirardL.-C.SymonA.MacGillivrayS. (2019). Counselling interventions to enable women to initiate and continue breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0235-8
40.
MelnykB. M.Fineout-OverholtE. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
41.
MoherD.ShamseerL.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
42.
MoonsK. G. M.AltmanD. G.ReitsmaJ. B.IoannidisJ. P. A.MacaskillP.SteyerbergE. W.VickersA. J.RansohoffD. F.CollinsG. S. (2015). Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(1), W1–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0698
43.
O’BrienB. C.HarrisI. B.BeckmanT. J.ReedD. A.CookD. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
44.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
45.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . . MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
RobinsonK.Garnier-VillarrealM.HansonL. (2018). Effectiveness of centering pregnancy on breastfeeding initiation among African Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000307
49.
SavitriA. I.IdrisN. S.IndawatiW.SaldiS. R. F.AmeliaD.BaharuddinM.SastroasmoroS.GrobbeeD. E.UiterwaalC. S. P. M. (2016). BReastfeeding Attitude and Volume Optimization (BRAVO) trial: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1397-y
50.
SchondelmeyerA. C.BettencourtA. P.XiaoR.BeidasR. S.WolkC. B.LandriganC. P.BradyP. W.BrentC. R.ParthasarathyP.Kern-GoldbergerA. S.SergayN.LeeV.RussellC. J.PrastoJ.ZamanS.McQuistionK.LuceyK.SolomonC.GarciaM., . . . Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network. (2021). Evaluation of an educational outreach and audit and feedback program to reduce continuous pulse oximetry use in hospitalized infants with stable bronchiolitis: A nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 4(9), e2122826. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22826
51.
SchulzK. F.AltmanD. G.MoherD.CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
52.
SheaB. J.ReevesB. C.WellsG.ThukuM.HamelC.MoranJ.MoherD.TugwellP.WelchV.KristjanssonE.HenryD. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
53.
SimeraI.MoherD.HoeyJ.SchulzK. F.AltmanD. G. (2009). The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. Maturitas, 63(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011
54.
StroupD. F.BerlinJ. A.MortonS. C.OlkinI.WilliamsonG. D.RennieD.MoherD.BeckerB. J.SipeT. A.ThackerS. B. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA, 283(15), 2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
55.
StuebeA. M.Meltzer-BrodyS.PropperC.PearsonB.BeilerP.ElamM.WalkerC.Mills-KoonceR.GrewenK. (2019). The mood, mother, and infant study: Associations between maternal mood in pregnancy and breastfeeding outcome. Breastfeeding Medicine, 14(8), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0079
TongA.FlemmingK.McInnesE.OliverS.CraigJ. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
59.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
60.
ValentineJ. C.CooperH. (2008). A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD). Psychological Methods, 13(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.130
61.
ValiY.LeeflangM. M. G.BossuytP. M. M. (2021). Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01744-z
62.
von ElmE.AltmanD. G.EggerM.PocockS. J.GøtzscheP. C.VandenbrouckeJ. P., & STROBE Initiative. (2008). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
63.
WhitfordH.HoddinottP.AmirL. H.ChamberlainC.EastC. E.JonesL.RenfrewM. J. (2018). Routinely collected infant feeding data: Time for global action. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(4), e12616. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12616
64.
WhitingP. F.RutjesA. W. S.WestwoodM. E.MallettS.DeeksJ. J.ReitsmaJ. B.LeeflangM. M. G.SterneJ. A. C.BossuytP. M. M.QUADAS-2 Group. (2011). QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
65.
ZanganehM.JordanM.MistryH. (2021). A systematic review of economic evaluations for donor human milk versus standard feeding in infants. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(2), e13151. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13151
66.
ZhangS.WuQ.van VelthovenM. H.ChenL.CarJ.RudanI.ZhangY.LiY.ScherpbierR. W. (2012). Smartphone versus pen-and-paper data collection of infant feeding practices in rural China. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), e119. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2183