American Psychological Association. (2020). Bias-free language guidelines. InPublication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.,) pp.132–148. https://doi.org/10.1037.0000165-000.
2.
BambergerE.FarrowA. (2021). Language for sex and gender inclusiveness in writing. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(2), 251–259.
3.
BambergerEJHL Editorial TeamFarrowA. (2021). Gendered and inclusive language in the preparation of manuscripts: Policy statement for the Journal of Human Lactation. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(2), 227–229.doi:10.1177/089033442199510333663263
4.
BauerGDevorAHeinzMMarshallZPullen SansfaçonAPyneJfor the Canadian Professional Association for Transgender Health (CPATH) Research Committee. (2019). CPATH Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Transgender People & Communities. Canadian Professional Association for Transgender Health. http://cpath.ca/en/resources/.
5.
BauerG. R.BraimohJ.ScheimA. I.DharmaC. (2017). Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One, 12(5), e0178043.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017804328542498
6.
CameronJ. J.StinsonD. A. (2019). Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11).doi:10.1111/spc3.12506
7.
CatalpaJ. M.McGuireJ. K.FishJ. N.Nic RiderG.BradfordN.BergD. (2019). Predictive validity of the genderqueer identity scale (GQI): Differences between genderqueer, transgender and cisgender sexual minority individuals. The International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(2-3), 305–314.doi:10.1080/15532739.2018.152819632999615
8.
DodgsonJ. E. (2012). Race, racism and disparities in breastfeeding. InHall-SmithP.HausmanB. L.LabbokM. (Eds.), Hausman & Labbok, Beyond health beyond choice: Breastfeeding constraints and realities. Rutgers University Press.doi:165.134.107.87
9.
DodgsonJ. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220–222.doi:10.1177/089033441983099030849272
10.
HaddawayN. R.MacuraB. (2018). The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 444–447.doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0180-3
11.
HeidariS.BaborT. F.De CastroP.TortS.CurnoM. (2016). Sex and gender equity in research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 2.doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0007-629451543
LangC.KuhnleU. (2008). Intersexuality and alternative gender categories in non-Western cultures. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 69(4), 240–250.doi:10.1159/000113025
14.
LuijenijkH. J.PageM. J.BurgerH.KoolmanX. (2020). Assessing risk of bias: A proposal for a unified framework for observational studies and randomized trials. BMC Medical Research and Methodology, 20(237).doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01115-7
15.
WinterS. (2009). Lost in transition: Transpeople, transprejudice and pathology in Asia. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(2-3), 365–390.doi:10.1080/13642980902758200