Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

German

Background

Early breastfeeding practices are important determinants of later breastfeeding behaviors and can be influenced by multiple factors. Despite the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative reported positive influence on breastfeeding initiation, its influence on the association between maternal country of birth and first day in-hospital breastfeeding has not been examined.

Research aims

To determine (1) if association between maternal country of birth and first day in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding exists in Portugal and (2) if any association is affected by giving birth in a Baby-Friendly Hospital.

Methods

Data were drawn from baMBINO—a longitudinal, 2017–2019 nationwide study designed to assess the perinatal health and healthcare experiences of migrant and native Portuguese women. Data from participants (N = 5,340) were collected during their hospital stay from 32 maternity units. Missing data were handled through multiple imputation. After stratifying by Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative accreditation, a multivariate logistic regression was performed.

Results

First day in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding rates were high among both migrant and native participants (89.2% vs. 87.4%). Migrants were more likely to exclusively breastfeed when compared to natives (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.00, 1.41]). In non-Baby-Friendly Hospitals, a positive association was found between participants from Eastern European countries (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI [1.27, 4.78]) and first day in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding. In accredited hospitals, maternal country of birth did not influence exclusive breastfeeding during the first 24 hr.

Conclusions

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative attenuates differences between migrant and native participants, promoting optimal breastfeeding practices among natives.

Keywords

Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative breastfeeding cultural norms exclusive breastfeeding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar-Ortega

J. M.

González-Pascual

J. L.

Cardenete-Reyes

Pérez-de-Algaba-Cuenca

Pérez-García

Esteban-Gonzalo

. (2019). Adherence to initial exclusive breastfeeding among Chinese born and native Spanish mothers. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 44.doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2161-y

30691401

Almeida

L. M.

Caldas

J. P.

Ayres-de-Campos

Dias

. (2014). Assessing maternal healthcare inequities among migrants: A qualitative study. Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health, 30(2), 333–340.doi:10.1590/0102-311X00060513

24627061

Coutinho

E. C.

Silva

A. L.

Lopes

C. S. M. S.

Parreira

V. B. C.

Duarte

J. C.

Nelas

P. A. B.

Chaves

C. M. B.

Amaral

M. O

. (2014). Becoming a mother in a strange land: What cultural care immigrant women experience in Portugal? Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 3(3), 142–160.doi:10.21664/2238-8869.2014v3i3.p142-160

Dennis

C. L.

Shiri

Brown

H. K.

Santos

H. P.

Schmied

Falah‐Hassani

. (2019). Breastfeeding rates in immigrant and non‐immigrant women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(3).doi:10.1111/mcn.12809

European Network for Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies . (2019, November 15). EUROCAT Guide 1.4: Instruction for the registration of congenital anomalies. EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster. https://eu-rd-platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/JRC-EUROCAT-Full-Guide-1.4-version-15-Nov-2019.pdf

Farchi

Asole

Chapin

E. M.

Di Lallo

. (2016). Breastfeeding initiation rates among immigrant women in central Italy between 2006 and 2011. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 29(2), 344–348.doi:10.3109/14767058.2014.1001358

25694258

Hauck

Y. L.

Bradfield

Kuliukas

. (2020). Women’s experiences with breastfeeding in public: An integrative review. Women and Birth. Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, S1871-5192(20), 30237-7.doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.008

Henderson

Carson

Jayaweera

Alderdice

Redshaw

. (2018). Recency of migration, region of origin and women’s experience of maternity care in England: Evidence from a large cross-sectional survey. Midwifery, 67, 87–94.doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.008

30273924

Hinic

. (2016). Predictors of breastfeeding confidence in the early postpartum period. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 45(5), 649–660.doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.04.010

27472996

10.

Instituto Nacional de Estatística . (2017). Partos (N.°) nos hospitais públicos de acesso universal e hospitais em parceria público-privada por localização geográfica (NUTS - 2013) e tipo de parto; anual [Births (No.) in public hospitals with universal access and hospitals in public-private partnership by geographic localization (NUTS - 2013) and type of delivery; annual]. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0008120&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2

11.

International Organization for Migration . (2019). Migrant. In Glossary on Migration. (IML Series No. 34, 236). International Organization for Migration. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml_34_glossary.pdf

12.

Kana

M. A.

Rodrigues

Fonseca

M. J.

Santos

A. C.

Barros

. (2018). Effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding practices: Results from Portuguese GXXI birth cohort. International Breastfeeding Journal, 13(1), 15.doi:10.1186/s13006-018-0157-x

29643932

13.

Kramer

M. S

Chalmers

Hodnett

E. D

Sevkovskaya

Dzikovich

Shapiro

Collet

J. P

Vanilovich

Mezen

Ducruet

Shishko

Zubovich

Mknuik

Gluchanina

Dombrovskiy

Ustinovitch

Kot

Bogdanovich

Ovchinikova

PROBIT Study Group (Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial)

. . .. (2001). Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): A randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA, 285(4), 413–420.doi:10.1001/jama.285.4.413

11242425

14.

McDonald

S. D.

Pullenayegum

Chapman

Vera

Giglia

Fusch

Foster

. (2012). Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 119(6), 1171–1179.doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318256194b

22617582

15.

Nolan

Layte

. (2015). The ‘healthy immigrant effect’: Breastfeeding behaviour in Ireland. European Journal of Public Health, 25(4), 626–631.doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku177

25422364

16.

Pérez-Escamilla

Martinez

J. L.

Segura-Pérez

. (2016). Impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: A systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 12(3), 402–417.doi:10.1111/mcn.12294

26924775

17.

Rechel

Mladovsky

Devillé

. (2012). Monitoring migrant health in Europe: A narrative review of data collection practices. Health Policy, 105(1), 10–16.doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.003

22277878

18.

Robert

Michaud-Létourneau

Dramaix-Wilmet

Swennen

Devlieger

. (2019). A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby‐Friendly Hospital status. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(4), e12845.doi:10.1111/mcn.12845

31106522

19.

Rollins

N. C

Bhandari

Hajeebhoy

Horton

Lutter

C. K

Martines

J. C

Piwoz

E. G

Richter

L. M

Victora

C. G

Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group . (2016). Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet, 387(10017), 491–504.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2

26869576

20.

Sankar

M. J.

Sinha

Chowdhury

Bhandari

Taneja

Martines

Bahl

. (2015). Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica, 104(467), 3–13.doi:10.1111/apa.13147

26249674

21.

Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde . (2018). Partos e cesarianas nos cuidados de saúde hospitalares [Births and cesarean sections in hospital healthcare] (Version 06) [Data set]. Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde. https://transparencia.sns.gov.pt/explore/dataset/partos-e-cesarianas/information/?disjunctive.regiao&disjunctive.instituicao&sort=tempo

22.

Tavoulari

E.-F.

Benetou

Vlastarakos

P. V.

Kreatsas

Linos

. (2015). Immigrant status as important determinant of breastfeeding practice in southern Europe. Central European Journal of Public Health, 23(1), 39–44.doi:10.21101/cejph.a4092

26036097

23.

United Nations Children’s Fund Portugal . (2018, September). Entidades Amigas dos Bebés [Baby-Friendly facilities]. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://www.unicef.pt/media/2323/lista-entidades-amigas-dos-bebes-2019-01-23.pdf

24.

United Nations Statistics Division . (2011, August 23). Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49)—Global inventory of statistical standards. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/iiss/Standard-Country-or-Area-Codes-for-Statistical-Use-M49.ashx

25.

Vehling

Chan

McGavock

Becker

A. B.

Subbarao

Moraes

T. J.

Mandhane

P. J.

Turvey

S. E.

Lefebvre

D. L.

Sears

M. R.

Azad

M. B

. (2018). Exclusive breastfeeding in hospital predicts longer breastfeeding duration in Canada: Implications for health equity. Birth, 45(4), 440–449.doi:10.1111/birt.12345

29498088

26.

Victora

C. G

Bahl

Barros

A. J. D

França

G. V. A

Horton

Krasevec

Murch

Sankar

M. J

Walker

Rollins

N. C

Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group . (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7

26869575

27.

World Health Organization . (n.d.). Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. https://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/bfhi/en/

28.

World Health Organization . (1981). International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. World Health Organization.

29.

World Health Organization . (2008). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: Part 1: Definitions: conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6-8 November 2007 in Washington DC, USA . https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43895/9789241596664_eng.pdf?sequence=1

30.

World Health Organization . (2018). Implementation guidance: Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services—The revised Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/bfhi-implementation-2018.pdf

31.

World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund . (1989). Protecting, promoting and supporting breast-feeding: The special role of maternity services / a joint WHO/UNICEF statement. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/39679/9241561300.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

32.

World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund . (1991). Innocenti Declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding. https://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_24807.html

33.

World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund . (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42590/9241562218.pdf

34.

Zhou

Younger

K. M.

Kearney

J. M

. (2010). An exploration of the knowledge and attitudes towards breastfeeding among a sample of Chinese mothers in Ireland. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 722.doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-722

21092303

35.

Zuppa

A. A.

Orchi

Calabrese

Verrillo

Perrone

Pasqualini

Cota

Ranno

Valentini

Giannantonio

Cardiello

Romagnoli

. (2010). Maternal and neonatal characteristics of an immigrant population in an Italian Hospital. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 23(7), 627–632.doi:10.3109/14767050903258761

20540656

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

0.02 MB

0.03 MB

Maternal Country of Birth and Exclusive Breastfeeding During the First In-Hospital Day in Portugal: The Influence of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative