Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Kingdom Committee for UNICEF recommend that secondary schools include infant feeding education in the curriculum. However, little attention has been given to the study of educators’ views and practices regarding infant feeding education.

Aims

The aims of this research were to (1) explore North Carolina Family and Consumer Sciences teachers’ attitudes towards infant feeding education in secondary schools and (2) describe North Carolina Family and Consumer Sciences teachers’ infant feeding education practices.

Methods

Researchers conducted interviews (N = 19) and a survey (N = 137) using a sequential mixed methods design. The constant comparative method was used to analyze interview transcripts. Subsequently, a 33-item survey was developed to assess teachers’ attitudes and practices, and this survey was tested for validity and reliability.

Results

The majority of participants supported including infant feeding (n = 119, 86.9%) and breastfeeding (n = 116, 84.7%) education in high school. Approximately half of the participants supported including infant feeding (n = 71, 51.9%) and breastfeeding (n = 64, 46.7%) education in middle school. Participants reported that they taught infant feeding at both levels; topics taught included complementary foods, patterns of infant feeding, and the safe preparation of infant formula. Breastfeeding content was covered primarily in the high school Parenting and Child Development course.

Conclusions

North Carolina Family and Consumer Sciences teachers have positive attitudes towards teaching about breastfeeding at the secondary school level. Content about infant nutrition and breastfeeding is currently included in courses that cover child development and human nutrition.

Keywords

breastfeeding breastfeeding promotion bottle feeding formula feeding lactation education high school teachers middle school teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Red Cross. (2008). American Red Cross babysitter’s training handbook. Retrieved from https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PHSS_UX_Content/Babysitters-Training-Handbook.pdf#

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Breastfeeding report card, United States, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2018breastfeedingreportcard.pdf

Cohen

D. J.

Crabtree

B. F.

(2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331–339.

Egbuonu

Ezechukwu

C. C.

Chukwuka

J. O.

(2004). Level of awareness of the Baby Friendly Initiative among home economics teachers in Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 50(6), 331–333.

Eidelman

A. I.

Schanler

R. J.

Johnston

Landers

Noble

Szucs

Viehmann

(2012). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 129(3), e827–e841.

Giles

Connor

McClenahan

Mallet

(2010). Attitudes to breastfeeding among adolescents. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 23(3), 285–293.

Given

L. M.

(2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Glaser

D. B.

Roberts

K. J.

Grosskopf

N. A.

Basch

C. H.

(2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness of school-based breastfeeding education. Journal of Human Lactation, 32(1), 46–52.

Greene

Stewart-Knox

Wright

(2003). Feeding preferences and attitudes to breastfeeding and its promotion among teenagers in Northern Ireland. Journal of Human Lactation, 19(1), 57–65.

10.

IBM Corporation (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 25.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.

11.

Lee

C. L.

(2013). A profile of North Carolina secondary family and consumer sciences teachers. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 31, 2.

12.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

13.

Morse

J. M.

(2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222.

14.

Moukarzel

Mamas

Farhat

Daly

A. J.

(2019). Getting schooled: Teachers’ views on school-based breastfeeding education in Lebanon. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14(1), 3.

15.

Polit

D. F.

Beck

C. T.

(2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497.

16.

Public Schools of North Carolina. (2017). 2018–2019 North Carolina career and technical education essential standards. Raleigh, North Carolina.

17.

Qualtrics. (2005). Qualtrics (December 2017). Provo, Utah, USA.

18.

Singletary

Chetwynd

Goodell

L. S.

Fogleman

(2017). Stakeholder views of breastfeeding education in schools: A systematic mixed studies review of the literature. International Breastfeeding Journal, 12(1), 14.

19.

SocioCultural Research Consultants, Llc. (2016). Dedoose web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (Version 7.6.24). Retrieved from www.dedoose.com.

20.

Spear

H. J.

(2010). School nurses and teachers: Attitudes regarding inclusion of breastfeeding education in school curricula. The Journal of School Nursing, 26(2), 137–146.

21.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

22.

Trakman

G. L.

Forsyth

Hoye

Belski

(2017). Developing and validating a nutrition knowledge questionnaire: Key methods and considerations. Public Health Nutrition, 20(15), 2670–2679.

23.

UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative. (1999). Towards national, regional and local strategies for breastfeeding. London: UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative.

24.

Victora

C. G.

Bahl

Barros

A. J.

França

G. V.

Horton

Krasevec

. . . Rollins

N. C.

(2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490.

25.

World Health Organization, & UNICEF. (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB