This article studies the role of ethics in the context of the work of International Board Certified Lactation Consultants. It provides an overview of some of the main ethical approaches with the goal of contributing to the knowledge, skills, and tools required by lactation consultants. Five main sections structure the article: background, current literature, ethical theory and principles, implications for lactation consultants, and decision-making frameworks. Background about the International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners and International Board Certified Lactation Consultants and the significance of applied ethics in their work are described. Current literature regarding ethics and lactation consultants is reviewed. Because a computer-based literature search yielded a lack of articles, ethics in nursing literature is also presented. Three main ethical theories and 5 key ethical principles are explored with a view to their implications for lactation consultants. Finally, decision-making frameworks are considered as systematic tools for making ethical decisions.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE). The Role of an IBCLC. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/role.htm. Accessed November 4, 2004.
2.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE). Candidate Information Guide 2005. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/docs/US%2520docs/CIG_US_2005-NO-APP.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2004.
3.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE). Become a Lactation Consultant. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/become.htm. Accessed November 4, 2004.
4.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE). The IBLCE Organization. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/about.htm. Accessed November 4, 2004.
5.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE). IBLCE Code of Ethics. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/ethics.htm. Accessed November 4, 2004.
6.
Scott JW.Code of Ethics for International Board Certified Lactation Consultants. J Hum Lact. 1996;12:344-337.
7.
IBLCE. CERPs for Ethics Topics. 2004. Available at: http://www.iblce.org/CERPS%2520for%2520ethics%2520topics.htm. Accessed November 4, 2004.
8.
Greiner T.Comments on the issue of industry financing/influence [letter to the editor]. J Hum Lact. 2003;19:362-363.
9.
Heinig MJ.The “price” of information [editor’s note]. J Hum Lact. 2003;19:133-135.
10.
Sachs M.Further comments on the issue of industry financing/influence [letter to the editor]. J Hum Lact. 2003;19:363-364.
11.
Young D.Conflicts of interest—in publishing and in practice [editorial]. Birth. 2004;31:81-83.
12.
World Health Organization. International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. 1981. Available at: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/code_english.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2004.
13.
Parilla Rodriguez AM, Gorrin Peralta JJ.Aspectos eticos en la promocion de la lactancia humana y el amamantamiento [Ethical aspects of human lactation and breastfeeding]. Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal. 2000;19:145-151.
14.
Rea MF, Marcolino FF, Colameo AJ, Trevellin LA.Protection of breastfeeding, marketing of human milk substitutes and ethics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;554:329-332.
15.
Rea MF, Toma TS. Proteção do leite materno e ética [Protection of mother’s milk and ethics]. Revista de Saude Publica. 2000;34:388-395.
16.
Young D.Violating “The Code”: Breastfeeding, ethics, and choices [editorial]. Birth. 2001;28:77-78.
17.
Wilfert CM, Ammann A, Bayer R, et al.Science, ethics, and the future of research into maternal infant transmission of HIV-1 [Consensus Statement]. Lancet. 1999;353:832-835.
18.
Kippley JF.Can breastfeeding be a moral issue?CCL Family Foundations. 1993;20, 6.
19.
Scott J.Ethics cerps now a requirement: for those certifying in 2007 or later. The IBCLICK. 2003;6, 1.
20.
Aiken TD.Legal, Ethical, and Political Issues in Nursing. 2nd ed.Philadelphia, Pa: F A Davis Company; 2004.
21.
Keatings M, Smith OB.Ethical & Legal Issues in Canadian Nursing. 2nd ed.Toronto, Canada: W B Saunders; 2000.
22.
Hamric AB.Bridging the gap between ethics and clinical practice. Nurs Outlook. 2002;50:176-178.
23.
Noble-Adams R.Ethics and nursing research 1: development, theories, and principles. Br J Nurs. 1999;8:888-892.
24.
Noble-Adams R.Ethics and nursing research 2: examination of the research process. Br J Nurs. 1999;8:956-960.
25.
Polit DF, Beck CT.Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed.Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
26.
Aveyard H.The requirement for informed consent prior to nursing care procedures. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37:243-249.
27.
McParland J, Scott PA, Arndt M, et al.Autonomy and clinical practice 3: issues of patient consent. Br J Nurs. 2000;9:507-513.
28.
Dodd S-J, Jansson BS, Brown-Saltzman K, Shirk M, Wunch K.Expanding nurses’ participation in ethics: an empirical examination of ethical activism and ethical assertiveness. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11:15-27.
29.
Hewitt-Taylor J.Issues involved in promoting patient autonomy in health care. Br J Nurs. 2003;12:1323-1330.
30.
Hyland D.An exploration of the relationship between patient autonomy and patient advocacy: implications for nursing practice. Nurs Ethics. 2002;9:472-482.
31.
McParland J, Scott PA, Arndt M, et al.Autonomy and clinical practice 1: identifying areas of concern. Br J Nurs. 2000;9:507-513.
32.
Scott PA, Taylor A, Välimäki M, et al.Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 2: postnatal perspective. Br J Nurs. 2003;12:117-127.
33.
Sleutel MR.Intrapartum nursing care: a case study of supportive interventions and ethical conflicts. Birth. 2000;27:38-45.
34.
Cahill J.Patient participation—a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7:119-128.
35.
Meulenbergs T, Verpeet E, Schotsmans P, Gastmans C.Professional codes in a changing nursing context: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:331-336.
36.
Peter E, Lunardi VL, Macfarlane A.Nursing resistance as ethical action: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:403-416.
37.
Bushy A, Raugh R, Matt BF.Ethical principles: application to an obstetric case. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1989;18:207-212.
38.
Miya PA, Pinch WJ, Boardman KK, Keene A, Spielman ML, Harr KL.Ethical perceptions of parents and nurses in NICU: the case of baby Michael. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1995;24:125-130.
39.
Freda MC, DeVore N, Valentine-Adams N, Bombard A, Merkatz IR.Informed consent for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening in an inner city population: how informed is it?J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998;27:99-106.
40.
Merkatz RB.Inclusion of women in clinical trials: a historical overview of scientific, ethical, and legal issues. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998;27:78-84.
41.
Beauchamp TL, Childress, JF.Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
42.
Maguire, DC. The Moral Choice. New York, NY: Doubleday & Co; 1978.
43.
Sherwin, S. No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics & Health Care. Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press; 1992.
44.
Baylis F, Downie J, Sherwin S.Reframing research involving humans. In: Sherwin S, coordinator, The Politics of Women’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press; 1998:234-259.
45.
Clouser KD, Gert B.A critique of principlism. J Med Philos. 1990; 15:219-236.
46.
Sherwin S.A relational approach to autonomy in health care. In: Sherwin S, coordinator, The Politics of Women’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press; 1998:19-47.
