Tuttle C. An open letter to the WIC program: the time has come to commit to breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 2000;16:99-103.
2.
Besharov DJ, Germanis P. Evaluating WIC. Eval Rev. 2000;24:123-190.
3.
Food assistance: WIC faces challenges in providing nutrition services. GAO-02-142, December 7, 2001.
4.
Avruch A, Cackley AP. Savings achieved by giving WIC benefits to women prenatally. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:27-34.
5.
Sherry B, Mei Z, Yip R. Continuation in the decline in prevalence of anemia in low-income infants and children in five states. Pediatrics. 2001;107:677-682.
6.
Tuttle CR, Dewey KG. Potential cost savings for Medical, AFDC, food stamps, and WIC programs associated with increasing breastfeeding among low-income Hmong women in California. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96:885-890.
7.
Montgomery DL, Splett PL. Economic benefit of breastfeeding infants enrolled in WIC. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:379-385.
8.
National Association of WIC Directors. Monday Morning Report, September 17, 2001. Washington, DC: National Association of WIC Directors. Available from www.nwica.org/home.htm.
9.
Fox MK, Burstein N, Golay J, Price C. WIC Nutrition Education Assessment Study: Final Report. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 1999.
10.
Baydar N, McCann M, Williams R, Vesper E, McKinney P. WIC Infant Feeding Practices Study: Summary of Findings. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation; 1997.
11.
Barton SJ. Infant feeding practices of low-income rural mothers. Am J Maternal/Child Nurs. 2001;26:93-97.
12.
Wilson AC, Forsyth JS, Greene SA, Irvine L, Hau C, Howie PW. Relation of infant diet to childhood health: seven year followup of cohort of children in Dundee infant feeding study. Br Med J. 1998;316:21-25.
13.
Bronner Y, Gross S, Caulfield L, et al. Influence of work or school on breastfeeding among urban African American WIC participants. In: Abstracts of the 124th Annual Meeting, American Public Health Association, November 17-21, 1996, New York City, Session #3090. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
14.
Abbott Laboratories. Breastfeeding Trends in the United States and WIC Population Demographics. Presentation at: Panel to Evaluate USDA's Methods for Estimating Eligibility and Participation in the WIC Program, Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, the National Academies; March 15, 2001; Washington, DC.
15.
Feldman-Winter L, Kruse L, Mulford C, Rotondo F. Lessons Learned About Breastfeeding Rates From Electronic Birth Certificate Data in New Jersey. Poster session: Partnerships for Health in the New Millennium: Launching Healthy People 2010; January 24-28, 2000; Washington, DC.
16.
Zimmerman DR. You can make a difference: increasing breastfeeding rates in an inner-city clinic. J Hum Lact. 1999;15:217-220.
17.
Weimer JP. Breastfeeding Promotion Research: The ES/WIC Nutrition Education Initiative and Economic Considerations. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; 1998. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 744.
18.
Zimmerman DR, Guttman N. “Breast is best”: knowledge among lowincome mothers is not enough. J Hum Lact. 2001;17:14-19.
19.
Reifsnider E, Eckhart D. Prenatal breastfeeding education: its effect on breastfeeding among WIC participants. J Hum Lact. 1997;13:121-125.
20.
Bentley ME, Caulfield LE, Gross SM, et al. Sources of influence on intention to breastfeed among African-American women at entry into WIC. J Hum Lact. 1999;15:27-34.
21.
Moreland JC, Lloyd L, Braun SB, Heins JN. A new teaching model to prolong breastfeeding among Latinos. J Hum Lact. 2000;16:337-341.
22.
Caulfield LE, Gross SM, Bentley ME, et al. WIC-based interventions to promote breastfeeding among African-American women in Baltimore: effects on breastfeeding initiation and continuation. J Hum Lact. 1998;14:15-22.
23.
Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Available from http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
24.
Mothers'Survey, Ross Products Division. Breastfeeding Trends Through 1999. Columbus, OH: Abbott Laboratories.
25.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 1997;100:1035-1039.
26.
American Academy of Family Physicians, Commission on Public Health. AAFP Policy and Position Statement on Breastfeeding. Leawood, KS: American Academy of Family Physicians, Commission on Public Health; 2001.
27.
As formulated in the conclusions and recommendations of the expert consultation (Geneva, March 28-30, 2001) that completed the systematic review of the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Document A54/INF.DOC./4 at the World Health Organization web site, http://www.who.ch.
28.
Ross Pediatrics. Breastfeeding: Recent Research and Continued Support: Ross Pediatrics Supports Optimal Infant Nutrition. Columbus, OH: Abbott Laboratories; 1999.
29.
Deshpande AD, Gazmararian JA. Breastfeeding education and support: association with the decision to breastfeed. Effective Clin Pract. 2000;3:116-122.
30.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. The use and misuse of fruit juice in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1210-1213.
31.
Dennison BA, Rockwell HL, Baker SL. Excess fruit juice consumption by preschool-aged children is associated with short stature and obesity. Pediatrics. 1997;99:15-22.
32.
Smith MM, Lifshitz F. Excess fruit juice consumption as a contributing factor in nonorganic failure to thrive. Pediatrics. 1994;93:438-443.
33.
Mohan A, Morse DE, O’Sullivan DM, Tinanoff N. The relationship between bottle usage/content, age, and number of teeth with mutans Streptococcicolonization in 6-24 month old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26:12-20.
34.
Fiscal year 1998 WIC food package cost analysis. OANE/FNS/USDA 12/08/99.
35.
Aldrich L. Consumer Use of Information: Implications for Food Policy. Washington, DC: Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; 1999. Agricultural Handbook No. 715.
36.
Food assistance: research provides limited information on the effectiveness of specific WIC nutrition services. GAO-01-442, March 30, 2001.
37.
Shaw E, Kaczorowski J. The effect of a peer counseling program on breastfeeding initiation and longevity in a low-income rural population. J Hum Lact. 1999;15:19-25.
38.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners. Candidate Information Guide and Application Booklet. Falls Church, VA: International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners; 2001.
39.
International Lactation Consultant Association. Standards of Practice for IBCLC Lactation Consultants. Raleigh, NC: International Lactation Consultant Association; 1999.
40.
Scott JA. The code of ethics for IBCLCs: ethical practice. In: Walker M, ed. Core Curriculum for Lactation Consultant Practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2002:517-527.
41.
Food assistance: activities and use of nonprogram resources at sixWIC agencies. GAO/RCED-00-202, September 29, 2000.
42.
Bronner Y, Barber T, Vogelhut J, Resnik AK. Breastfeeding peer counseling: results from the national WIC survey. J Hum Lact. 2001; 17:119-124.
43.
Ahluwalia IB, Tessaro I, Grummer-Strawn LM, MacGowan C, Benton-Davis S. Georgia's breastfeeding promotion program for lowincome women. Pediatrics. 2000;105:e85-e85. Available from http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/105/6/e85.
44.
Bronner Y, Barber T, Davis S. Breastfeeding peer counseling: policy implications. J Hum Lact. 2001;17:105-109.
45.
Bronner Y, Barber T, Miele L. Breastfeeding peer counseling: rationale for the national WIC survey. J Hum Lact. 2001;17:135-139.
46.
Kistin N, Abramson R, Dublin P. Effect of peer counselors on breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration among low-income urban women. J Hum Lact. 1994;10:11-15.
47.
Long DG, Funk-Archuleta MA, Geiger CJ, Mozar AJ, Heins JN. Peer counselor program increases breastfeeding rates in Utah Native American WIC population. J Hum Lact. 1995;11:279-284.
48.
Pugh LC, Milligan RA, Brown LP. The breastfeeding support team for low-income, predominantly minority women: a pilot intervention study. Health Care Women Int. 2001;22:501-515.
49.
Raisler J. Against the odds: breastfeeding experiences of low income mothers. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2000;45:253-263.
50.
Schafer E, Vogel MK, Viegas S, Hausafres C. Volunteer peer counselors increase breastfeeding duration among rural low-income women. Birth. 1998;25:101-106.
51.
Buckner E, Matsubara M. Support network utilization by breastfeeding mothers. J Hum Lact. 1993;9:231-235.
52.
Humphreys AS, Thompson NJ, Miner KR. Intention to breastfeed in low-income pregnant women: the role of social support and previous experience. Birth. 1998;25:169-174.
53.
Quarles A, Williams PD, Hoyle DA, Brimeyer M, Williams AR. Mothers' intention, age, education, and the duration and management of breastfeeding. Maternal Child Nurs J. 1994;22:102-108.
54.
Grummer-Strawn LM, Rice SP, Dugas K, Clark LD, Benton-Davis S. An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion through peer counseling in Mississippi WIC clinics. Maternal Child Health J. 1997;1:35-42.