Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2000-11
Does Breastfeeding Education Affect Nursing Staff Beliefs,Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates,and Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Compliance? The Experience of a Small,Rural Canadian Hospital
The effectiveness of a breastfeeding education intervention consisting of a 11/2-hour mandated session for all nursing staff, with an optional self-paced tutorial, was evaluated in a small rural Canadian hospital. The intervention was designed to increase exclusive breastfeeding rates, create positive beliefs and attitudes among staff members, and increase compliance with the World Health Organization/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI). Staff surveys and chart audits were conducted at both the intervention and control site hospitals prior to the intervention and 7 months after the intervention. Over a 7-month period, the intervention hospital experienced an increase in BFHI compliance (24.4 vs. 31.9, P<.01), breastfeeding beliefs (55.0 vs. 58.8, P<.05), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (31% vs. 54% of breastfed babies, P<.05) but no change in breastfeeding attitudes (44.0 vs. 44.9, P=.80). The control site experienced no change in BFHI compliance, beliefs, or attitudes but a significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rates (43% vs. 0%, P<.05).
Marmet C. Summary of institutional actions affecting breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1993;9:109-113.
2.
World Health Organization. Protecting, Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding: The Special Role of Maternity Services. A joint WHO/UNICEF Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1989.
3.
World Health Organization. The International Code of the Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1981.
4.
World Health Organization. Infant andYoung Child Feeding: WHOResolution 39.28, adopted May 16, 1986. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1986.
5.
Saadeh R, Akré J. Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding: A summary of the rationale and scientific evidence. Birth. 1996;23:154-160.
6.
World Health Organization. Evidence for the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.
7.
Canadian Hospital Association. Policy statement on breast-feeding. Canadian Lactation Consultants' Association News. 1994/1995;9:12-13.
8.
Levitt C, Hanvey L, Avard D, Chance G, Kaczorowski J. Survey of Routine Maternity Care and Practices in Canadian Hospitals. Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada and Canadian Institute of Child Health; 1995.
9.
Dunlop M. Few Canadian hospitals qualify for “baby friendly” designation by promoting breastfeeding: Survey. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:87-89.
10.
Breastfeeding Promotion Steering Committee of Manitoba. Provincial Infant Feeding Study: How Baby-Friendly Are Manitoba Hospitals?Winnipeg, Manitoba: Breastfeeding Promotion Steering Committee of Manitoba; 1998.
11.
Martens PJ, Phillips S, Cheang MS, Breastfeeding Promotion Steering Committee of Manitoba, Rosolowich V. How baby-friendly are Manitoba hospitals? The Provincial Infant Feeding Study. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2000;91:51-57.
12.
Iker CE, Mogan J. Supplementation of breastfed infants: Does continuing education for nurses make a difference?J Hum Lact. 1992;8:131-135.
13.
Bruce N, Griffioen A. Usefulness of a non-experimental study design in the evaluation of service developments for infant feeding in a general hospital. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:1109-1116.
14.
Wright A, Rice S, Wells S. Changing hospital practices to increase the duration of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 1996;97:669-675.
15.
Wilmoth TA, Elder JP. An assessment of research on breastfeeding promotion strategies in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41: 579-594.
16.
Nylander G, Lindemann R, Helsing E, Bendvold E. Unsupplemented breastfeeding in the maternity ward: Positive long-term effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70:205-209.
17.
Winikoff B, Myers D, Laukaran VH, Stone R. Overcoming obstacles to breast-feeding in a large municipal hospital: Applications of lessons learned. Pediatrics1987;80:423-433.
18.
Westphal MF, Taddei JAC, Venancio SI, Bogus CM. Breast-feeding training for health professionals and resultant institutional changes. Bull WHO. 1995;73:461-468.
19.
Hintze JL. NCSS 97 Statistical System for Windows. Kaysville, Utah: Number Cruncher Statistical Systems; 1997. Available at: www.ncss.com.
20.
WHO/UNICEF. Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: 1. The Global Criteria for the WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/UNICEF; 1992.
21.
US Committee for UNICEF Interim Activities in the USA. Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Hospital Self-Appraisal Tool. Washington, DC: US Committee for UNICEF; 1993.
22.
Kovach AC. An assessment tool for evaluating hospital breastfeeding policies and practices. J Hum Lact. 1996;12:41-45.
23.
Martens PJ, Young TK. Determinants of breastfeeding in four Canadian Ojibwa communities: A decision-making model. Am J Hum Biol. 1997;9:579-593.
Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage University Papers 07-017. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1979.
26.
Mohrbacher N, Stock J. La Leche League International's The Breastfeeding Answer BookRev. ed.Schaumburg, Ill: La Leche League International; 1997.
27.
Martens PJ. Prenatal infant feeding intent and perceived social support for breastfeeding in First Nations communities: A role for health care providers. Int J Circumpolar Health. 1997;56:104-120.
28.
Auerbach KG, Riordan J. The breastfeeding process: The perinatal and intrapartum period. In: Riordan J, Auerbach KA, eds. Breastfeeding and Human Lactation. 2nd ed.Toronto, Ontario: Jones and Bartlett; 1999:279-309.
29.
Valdes V, Pubin E, Labbok MH, Perez A, Catalan S, Adler MR. The effects on professional practices of a three-day course on breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1995;11:185-190.
