Objective: Associations between dimensions of narcissism and aggression have been well-documented in Western samples. We aimed to generalize findings regarding the validity of one-, two- (Grandiose Narcissism, GN, and Vulnerable Narcissism, VN), and three-factor models (Agentic Narcissism, Agent; Neurotic Narcissism, Neuro; Antagonistic Narcissism, Antag) of narcissism and associations with aggression to Chinese offender and nonoffender samples. Methods: Our preregistered study used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a novel methodological approach, relative weights analysis (RWA) in an offender (N = 485) and a community (N = 578) sample from China to examine the generalizability of narcissism dimensions, and within-study meta-analysis using 9 samples (N = 3520, and 282 effect sizes) to examine links between narcissism dimensions and aggression. Results: The two-factor model replicated well across samples and three-factor model replicated moderately, with differences emerging for the structure of Antag in offenders. Narcissism was positively correlated with aggression, although associations varied across narcissism dimensions and types of aggression. Conclusion: The dimensional models of narcissism and associations with aggression generalized fairly well from Western to Chinese offender and nonoffender populations, although some potential differences worthy of consideration in future research and practice were observed.
AckermanR. A.DonnellanM. B.RobertsB. W.FraleyR. C. (2016). The effect of response format on the psychometric properties of the narcissistic personality inventory: Consequences for item meaning and factor structure. Assessment, 23(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568113
2.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure?Assessment, 18(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110382845
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
BjørnebekkG.HowardR. (2012). Validation of a motivation-based typology of angry aggression among antisocial youths in Norway. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2007
8.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.219
9.
BushmanB. J.HuesmannL. R. (2010). Aggression. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 833–863). Wiley.
BussA. H.WarrenW. L. (2000). The aggression questionnaire manual. Western Psychological Services.
12.
CaiH. J.KwanV. S. Y.SedikidesC. (2012). A sociocultural approach to narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.852
13.
CainN. M.PincusA. L.AnsellE. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006
14.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
15.
ChangL. C.ArkinR. M.LeongF. T.ChanD. K. S.LeungK. (2004). Subjective overachievement in American and Chinese college students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260461
16.
ChenF. R.YangY.QianM. (2013). Chinese version of impulsive/premeditated aggression scale: Validation and its psychometric properties. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.741664
17.
CroweM. L.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464
18.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye - confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170
19.
CzarnaA. Z.ZajenkowskiM.MaciantowiczO.SzymaniakK. (2021). The relationship of narcissism with tendency to react with anger and hostility: The roles of neuroticism and emotion regulation ability. Current Psychology, 40(11), 5499–5514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00504-6
20.
DaveyL.DayA.HowellsK. (2005). Anger, over-control and serious violent offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(5), 624–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2004.12.002
21.
DengJ.YangR.WangM. (2017). Psychometric properties of narcissistic admiration and rivalry questionnaire in Chinese adolescent. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(3), 445–447. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.03.010
22.
Di PierroR.CostantiniG.FantiE.Di SarnoM.PretiE.MadedduF.ClarkinJ. F.CaligorE.De PanfilisC. (2023). Measurement invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory and multimethod examination of narcissistic presentations in community and clinical samples. Assessment, 30(5), 1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221101367
23.
DongY.DumasD. (2020). Are personality measures valid for different populations? A systematic review of measurement invariance across cultures, gender, and age. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109956.
24.
DowgwilloE. A.DawoodS.PincusA. L. (2016). The dark side of narcissism. In Zeigler-HillV.MarcusD. K. (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 25–44). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-002
25.
DuT. V.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2022a). The relation between narcissism and aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(4), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12684
26.
DuT. V.ThomasK. M.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2022b). Differentiations in interpersonal functioning across narcissism dimensions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 36(4), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.4.455
27.
EdwardsB. G.AlbertsonE.VeronaE. (2017). Dark and vulnerable personality trait correlates of dimensions of criminal behavior among adult offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000281
28.
FosterJ. D.McCainJ. L.HibbertsM. F.BrunellA. B.Burke JohnsonR. (2015). The grandiose narcissism scale: A global and facet-level measure of grandiose narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.042
GloverN.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2012). The five-factor narcissism inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.670680
HendinH. M.CheekJ. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of murray’s narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
33.
HepperE. G.HartC. M.MeekR.CisekS.SedikidesC. (2014). Narcissism and empathy in young offenders and non-offenders. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1939
34.
HofstedeG.McCraeR. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443
HowardR. C. (2011). The quest for excitement: A missing link between personality disorder and violence?Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(5), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.617540
37.
HyattC. S.ZeichnerA.MillerJ. D. (2019). Laboratory aggression and personality traits: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000236
38.
HylerS. E. (1994). PDQ‐4+ personality questionnaire. New York State Psychiatric Institute.
39.
JaukE.OlaruG.SchuerchE.BackM. D.MorfC. C. (2022). Validation of the German five-factor narcissism inventory and construction of a brief form using ant colony optimization. Assessment, 30(4), 969–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221075761
40.
KahnR. E.ByrdA. L.PardiniD. A. (2013). Callous-unemotional traits robustly predict future criminal offending in young men. Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/b0000003
41.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 624–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452760
42.
KjærvikS. L.BushmanB. J. (2021). The link between narcissism and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(5), 477–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000323
43.
KowalskiC. M.RogozaR.VernonP. A.SchermerJ. A. (2018). The Dark Triad and the self-presentation variables of socially desirable responding and self-monitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.007
44.
KrizanZ.HerlacheA. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018
45.
KrizanZ.JoharO. (2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000013
46.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
47.
LambeS.Hamilton-GiachritsisC.GarnerE.WalkerJ. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650190
48.
LaschC. (1979). The culture of narcissism. Norton.
49.
LiJ.DongS.WangX. (2018). Validation of pathological narcissism inventory in Chinese university students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.02.009.
50.
LiX.Phillips MichaelR.ZhangY.NiuY.TongY.YangS. (2011). Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Buss & Perry aggression questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 37(10), 607–613.
51.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
52.
LiuJ.ZhouY.GuW. (2009). Reliability and validity of Chinese version of buss-perry aggression questionnaire in adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17(4), 449–451.
53.
LiuY. P.HeY.ZhouB. T.WangD. D.ZhaoH.YangB. (2021a). Reliability and validity of brief and super brief version of pathological narcissism inventory in Chinese offenders. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(4), 702–707. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.04.008
54.
LiuY. P.LiS. S.HeY.WangD. D.YangB. (2021b). Eliminating threat or venting rage? The relationship between narcissism and aggression in violent offenders. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00244
55.
LiuY. P.ZhouB. T.OuyangY. T.YangB.XieQ. H. (2023). Development and validation of Chinese form short dark Tetrad(C-SD4). Heliyon, 9(1), e12929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12929
56.
Lorenzo-SevaU.ten BergeJ. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
MaxwellJ. P. (2008). Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the buss-warren aggression questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.037
59.
MillerJ. D.BackM. D.LynamD. R.WrightA. G. C. (2021). Narcissism today: What we know and what we need to learn. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(6), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211044109
60.
MillerJ. D.CampbellW. K.PilkonisP. A. (2007). Narcissistic personality disorder: Relations with distress and functional impairment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.10.003
61.
MillerJ. D.FewL. R.WilsonL.GentileB.WidigerT. A.MacKillopJ.Keith CampbellW. (2013). The five-factor narcissism inventory (FFNI): A test of the convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of FFNI scores in clinical and community samples. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032536
62.
MillerJ. D.GentileB.CarterN. T.CroweM.HoffmanB. J.CampbellW. K. (2018). A Comparison of the nomological networks associated with forced-choice and Likert formats of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731
63.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
64.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2017). A passionate call for dispassionate conclusion: Comment on Fossati et al. (2016). Psychological Assessment, 29(11), 1413–1416. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000473
65.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K. (2016). Measures of narcissism and their relations to DSM-5 pathological traits: A critical reappraisal. Assessment, 23(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114522909
MillerJ. D.MaplesJ. L.BuffardiL.CaiH. J.GentileB.Kisbu-SakaryaY.KwanV. S. Y.LoPilatoA.PendryL. F.SedikidesC.SiedorL.CampbellW. K. (2015). Narcissism and United States’ culture: The view from home and around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1068–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039543
68.
MillerJ. D.McCainJ.LynamD. R.FewL. R.GentileB.MacKillopJ.CampbellW. K. (2014). A comparison of the criterion validity of popular measures of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder via the use of expert ratings. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036613
69.
MoorL.AndersonJ. R. (2019). A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027.
70.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (1993). Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance-explorations in object relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196001
71.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
72.
Packer WestM.MillerJ. D.WeissB.SpencerC. C.CroweM. L.CampbellW. K.LynamD. R. (2021). Development and validation of the super-short form of the five-factor narcissism inventory (FFNI-SSF). Personality and Individual Differences, 177, 110825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110825.
73.
PaulhusD. L.BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.JonesD. N. (2021). Screening for dark personalities: The short dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
74.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
75.
PincusA. L.AnsellE. B.PimentelC. A.CainN. M.WrightA. G. C.LevyK. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016530
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality-Inventory and further evidence of its construct-validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.890
80.
RasmussenK. (2016). Entitled vengeance: A meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21632
RingwaldW. R.ForbesM. K.WrightA. G. C. (2023). Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP) model. Psychological Medicine, 53(2), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001902
83.
RogozaR.CieciuchJ.StrusW.KlosowskiM. (2021). Investigating the structure of the polish five factor narcissism inventory: Support for the three-factor model of narcissism. Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000901
84.
RogozaR.CroweM. L.JamisonL.CieciuchJ.StrusW. (2022). Support for the three-factor model of narcissism and its personality underpinnings through the lens of the network psychometrics. Psychological Assessment, 34(9), 880–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001149
RunionsK. C.BakM.ShawT. (2017). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The cyber-aggression typology questionnaire (CATQ). Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
87.
RunionsK. C.SalmivalliC.ShawT.BurnsS.CrossD. (2018). Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21770
88.
SchellK. L.OswaldF. L. (2013). Item grouping and item randomization in personality measurement. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.008
89.
SchoenleberM.RocheM. J.WetzelE.PincusA. L.RobertsB. W. (2015). Development of a brief version of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1520–1526. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000158
90.
ShermanE. D.MillerJ. D.FewL. R.CampbellW. K.WidigerT. A.CregoC.LynamD. R. (2015). Development of a short form of the five-factor narcissism inventory: The FFNI-SF. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000100
91.
ShroutP. E. (1998). Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029800700306
92.
SnowL. (2002). Prisoners’ motives for self-injury and attempted suicide. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 4(4), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200200023
93.
SouthC. R.WoodJ. (2006). Bullying in prisons: The importance of perceived social status, prisonization, and moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20149
94.
Spencer-RodgersJ.BoucherH. C.MoriS. C.WangL.PengK. (2009). The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325772
TengZ. J.LiuY. L.GuoC. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between self-esteem and aggression among Chinese students. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.005.
97.
ThalmayerA. G.ToscanelliC.ArnettJ. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000622
98.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2015). RWA web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
99.
TwengeJ. M. (2011). Narcissism and culture. In CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 202–209). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
100.
van HouwelingenH. C.ArendsL. R.StijnenT. (2002). Advanced methods in meta-analysis: Multivariate approach and meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21(4), 589–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1040
101.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
102.
VizeC. E.LynamD. R.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders, 9(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000222
103.
WangX. Y. (2008). Research the effect of narcissism on self-esteem and subjective well-being among college students. Unpublished master’s thesis. Shaanxi Normal University.
104.
WetzelE.LangF. J.BackM. D.VecchioneM.RogozaR.RobertsB. W. (2021). Measurement invariance of three narcissism questionnaires across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. Assessment, 28(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120907967
105.
WetzelE.RobertsB. W.FraleyR. C.BrownA. (2016). Equivalence of Narcissistic Personality Inventory constructs and correlates across scoring approaches and response formats. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.12.002
WrightA. G. C.LukowitskyM. R.PincusA. L.ConroyD. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 17(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110373227
YangY. P.ShenD. Y.WangJ. Y.YangJ. (2002). The reliability and validity of PDQ-4+ in China. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(3), 165–168.
110.
ZhangW. L.JiaS. W.ChenG. H.ZhangW. X. (2014). Reliability and validity of reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire in college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(2), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.02.022
111.
ZhouM.ZhouB. T.YangB.LiuY. P.(in press). The validition of Chinese angry aggression scale among undergraduate sample. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
