Population migration, as one of the most significant activities in human history and current societies, can shape a mobile social ecology entwined with personality traits. In this research, we tested whether the Dark Triad personality traits would adaptively emerge in and self-select into a residentially mobile ecology across eight studies (total N = 6147). Studies 1–2 demonstrated the relationship between residential mobility and the Dark Triad traits. Personal residential mobility was positively related to the Dark Triad traits (Study 1b), and this relationship was detected by lay persons (Study 1a). Residents living in a country (Study 2a) or a province (Study 2b) with a high net population outflow reported a high level of the Dark Triad traits. Studies 3–4 explored the interplay of residential mobility and the Dark Triad traits. Studies 3a–3b revealed the shaping effect of residential mobility, showing that individuals with the mindset of residential mobility (vs. stability) tended to resort to the Dark Triad traits. In contrast, individuals who possess a high level of Dark Triad traits prefer a mobile lifestyle (Study 4a) and a residence with high outflow (Study 4b). Together, this research empirically illuminated the associations and the interactions between residential mobility and personality traits.
AbreuD. (1988). On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica, 56(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911077
3.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
4.
BelskyJ.SchlomerG. L.EllisB. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024454
BleidornW. (2009). Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality, 23(6), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.731
7.
BlumG. S.RauthmannJ. F.GöllnerR.LischetzkeT.SchmittM. (2018). The nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) Model: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2138
8.
BookA.VisserB. A.VolkA. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016
9.
Boynton-JarrettR.HairE.ZuckermanB. (2013). Turbulent times: Effects of turbulence and violence exposure in adolescence on high school completion, health risk behavior, and mental health in young adulthood. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 95, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.007
10.
BrileyD. A.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1303–1331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037091
11.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.2.671
12.
ButtrickN. R.OishiS. (2021). The cultural dynamics of declining residential mobility. American Psychologist, 76(6), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000881
13.
CampbellP. (2019). Dispositional traits and internal migration: Personality as a predictor of migration in Australia. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.009
CurtisS. R.JonesD. N. (2020). Understanding what makes dark traits “vulnerable”: A distinction between indifference and hostility. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109941
17.
DedrickR. F.FerronJ. M.HessM. R.HogartyK. Y.KromreyJ. D.LangT. R.NilesJ. D.LeeR. S.LeeR. S. (2009). Multilevel modeling: A review of methodological issues and applications. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 69–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325581
18.
DowgwilloE. A.PincusA. L. (2017). Differentiating dark triad traits within and across interpersonal circumplex surfaces. Assessment, 24(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116643161
19.
EdwardsJ. R.CaplanR. D.HarrisonR. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford University Press.
20.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T.BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IjzendoornM. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
24.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
25.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D'AmatoA.SubiratsM.FischlmayrI. C.YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
26.
GötzF. M.EbertT.GoslingS. D.ObschonkaM.PotterJ.RentfrowP. J. (2021). Local housing market dynamics predict rapid shifts in cultural openness: A 9-year study across 199 cities. American Psychologist, 76(6), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000812
27.
GötzF. M.EbertT.RentfrowP. J. (2018). Regional cultures and the psychological geography of Switzerland: Person–environment–fit in personality predicts subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00517
28.
GötzF. M.StiegerS.GoslingS. D.PotterJ.RentfrowP. J. (2020). Physical topography is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0930-x
29.
HarmsP.RobertsB. W.WinterD. G. (2006). Becoming the harvard man: Person-environment fit, personality development, and academic success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 851–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287720
30.
HarmsP. DSpainS. M. (2015). Beyond the bright side: Dark personality at work. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12042
31.
HarrisonA. J.SummersJ. K.MenneckeB. E. (2018). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-016-3368-3
32.
HenryS.PichéV.OuédraogoD.LambinE. F. (2003). Descriptive analysis of the individual migratory pathways according to environmental typologies. Population and Environment, 25(5), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000036929.19001.A4
33.
HoltzmanN. S.StrubeM. J. (2011). The intertwined evolution of narcissism and short term mating. In: The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 210–220).
34.
HuangN.ZuoS.WangF.CaiP.WangF. (2017). The dark side of malleability: Incremental theory promotes immoral behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01341
35.
JohnsonW. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on behavior: Capturing all the interplay. Psychological Review, 114(2), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.423
36.
JokelaM. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.005
37.
JokelaM. (2020). Selective residential mobility and social influence in the emergence of neighborhood personality differences: Longitudinal data from Australia. Journal of Research in Personality, 86, 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103953
38.
JokelaM. (2021). Personality traits and reasons for residential mobility: Longitudinal data from United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, 110978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110978
39.
JokelaM.BleidornW.LambM. E.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(3), 725–730. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415800112
40.
JonasonP. K. (2018). Bright lights, big city: The Dark Triad traits and geographical preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.024
41.
JonasonP. K.BaughmanH. M.CarterG. L.ParkerP. (2015). Dorian gray without his portrait: Psychological, social, and physical health costs associated with the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.008
42.
JonasonP. K.IchoA.IrelandK. (2016). Resources, harshness, and unpredictability: The socioeconomic conditions associated with the dark triad traits. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 147470491562369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623699
43.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.BussD. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2009.11.003
44.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.WebsterG. D.SchmittD. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698
45.
JonasonP. K.LyonsM.BethellE. (2014). The making of darth vader: Parent-child care and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.006
46.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
47.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
48.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609347591
49.
KammrathL. K.ArmstrongB. F.IIILaneS. P.FrancisM. K.CliftonM.McNabK. M.BaumgartenO. M. (2020). What predicts who we approach for social support? Tests of the attachment figure and strong ties hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000189
50.
KandlerC.RauthmannJ. F. (2021). Conceptualizing and studying characteristics, units, and fits of persons and environments: A coherent synthesis. European Journal of Personality, 36(3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211048728
51.
KandlerC.Zapko-WillmesA.RichterJ.RiemannR. (2021). Synergistic and dynamic genotype-environment interplays in the development of personality differences. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 155–181). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00007-8
52.
KruegerR. F.JohnsonW. (2008). Behavioral genetics and personality: A new look at the integration of nature and nurture. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (eds), Hand-book of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 287–310). Guilford.
53.
LángA.BirkásB. (2014). Machiavellianism and perceived family functioning in adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.065
54.
LeckeltM.KüfnerA. C. P.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 856–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000057
55.
LunJ.RothD.OishiS.KesebirS. (2013). Residential mobility, social support concerns, and friendship strategy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612453345
56.
McCannS. J. H. (2015). Big five personality and residential mobility: A state-level analysis of the USA. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1007027
57.
MeđedovićJ. (2018). What can human personality psychology learn from behavioral ecology?Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000120
58.
OdaR.Matsumoto-OdaA. (2022). Hexaco, dark triad and altruism in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111303
59.
OishiS. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781
OishiS.IshiiK.LunJ. (2009). Residential mobility and conditionality of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.028
62.
OishiS.KesebirS. (2012). Optimal social-networking strategy is a function of socioeconomic conditions. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446708
63.
OishiS.MiaoF. F.KooM.KislingJ.RatliffK. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024949
64.
OishiS.TsangS. (2022). The socio‐ecological psychology of residential mobility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1310
65.
OkE.QianY.StrejcekB.AquinoK. F. (2021). Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1634–1661. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000329
66.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (eds), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X
67.
PaulhusD. L.HemphillJ. D.HareR. D. (2009). Manual for the self-report psychopathy scale. Multi-Health Systems.
68.
PaulhusD. L.JonesD. N. (2011). Introducing a short measure of the dark triad. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.
69.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
70.
PechorroP.DelisiM.GonçalvesR.A.BragaT.MarôcoJ. (2022). Dark triad personalities, self-control, and antisocial/criminal outcomes in youth. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 22(5), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2013356
71.
PuthillamA.KarandikarS.KapoorH.ParekhA. (2020). Gratitude blindness: How does the Dark Triad experience gratitude?Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110309. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ympc7
72.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
73.
RauthmannJ. F. (2021). Capturing interactions, correlations, fits, and transactions: A person-environment relations model. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), Handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 427–522). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00018-2
74.
RauthmannJ. F.KolarG. P. (2013). The perceived attractiveness and traits of the dark triad: Narcissists are perceived as hot, machiavellians and psychopaths not. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2012.11.005
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 3(5), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x
77.
RentfrowP. J.JokelaM. (2016). Geographical psychology: The spatial organization of psychological phenomena. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416658446
78.
RindermannH.ThompsonJ. (2016). The cognitive competences of immigrant and native students across the world: An analysis of gaps, possible causes and impact. Journal of Biosocial Science, 48(1), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932014000480
79.
RogozaR.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.JonasonP. K.PiotrowskiJ.CampbellK. W.GebauerJ. E.MaltbyJ.SedikidesC.AdamovicM.AdamsB. G.AngR. P.ArdiR.AtitsogbeK. A.BaltatescuS.BilićS.BodrožaB.Gruneau BrulinJ.Bundhoo PoonoosamyH. Y.ChaleeraktrakoonT.WłodarczykA. (2021). Structure of dark triad dirty dozen across eight world regions. Assessment, 28(4), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120922611
80.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
81.
SciandraM.SanbonmatsuL.DuncanG. J.GennetianL. A.KatzL. F.KesslerR. C.KlingJ. R.LudwigJ. (2013). Long-term effects of the Moving to Opportunity residential mobility experiment on crime and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(4), 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9189-9
82.
SngO.NeubergS. L.VarnumM. E. W.KenrickD. T. (2017). The crowded life is a slow life: Population density and life history strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 736–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000086
83.
SteadR.Cynthia FekkenG.KayA.McdermottK. (2012). Conceptualizing the dark triad of personality: Links to social symptomatology. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.021
84.
StiegerS.GötzF. M.WilsonC.VolsaS.RentfrowP. J. (2022). A tale of peaks and valleys: Sinusoid relationship patterns between mountainousness and basic human values. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211034966
85.
SuJ. C.ChiuC. Y.LinW. F.OishiS. (2016). Social monitoring matters for deterring social deviance in stable but not mobile socio-ecological contexts. PLoS One, 11(11), Article e0167053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167053
86.
te NijenhuisJ.de JongM.-J.EversA.van der FlierH. (2004). Are cognitive differences between immigrant and majority groups diminishing?European Journal of Personality, 18(5), 405–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.511
87.
ThielmannI.ZimmermannJ.LeisingD.HilbigB. E. (2017). Seeing is knowing: On the predictive accuracy of self- and informant reports for prosocial and moral behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2112
88.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(4–5), 375–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z
89.
TriversR. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
90.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affair - Un Desa. (2017). UN handbook on measuring international migration through population censuses.
91.
United Nations Population Fund – UNFPA. (1993). Population analysis for policies and programmes.
92.
Van de VliertE.Van LangeP. A. M. (2019). Latitudinal psychology: An ecological perspective on creativity, aggression, happiness, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 14(5), 860–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619858067
93.
Van de VliertE.YangH.WangY.RenX. (2013). Climato-economic imprints on Chinese collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112463605
94.
VernonP. A.VillaniV. C.VickersL. C.HarrisJ. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
95.
VizeC. E.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2019). Antagonism in the dark triad. In MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (eds), The handbook of antagonism (pp. 253–267). Academic Press.
96.
WagnerJ.OrthU.BleidornW.HopwoodC. J.KandlerC. (2020). Towards an integrative model of sources of personality stability and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 438–444. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qzef8
97.
WeiW.LuJ. G.GalinskyA. D.WuH.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.YuanW.ZhangQ.GuoY.ZhangM.GuiW.GuoX. Y.PotterJ.WangJ.LiB.LiX.HanY. M.LvM.GuoX. Q.WangL. (2017). Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(12), 890–895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0
98.
WhiteM. P.AlcockI. P.WheelerB. W.DepledgeM. (2013). Would you Be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science, 24(6), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464659
99.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2275
100.
XuL.LuoY.WenX.SunZ.ChaoC.XiaT.XuL. (2022). Human personality is associated with geographical environment in mainland China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710819
101.
YoshinoS.OshioA. (2022). Personality and migration in Japan: Examining the tendency of extroverted and open people to migrate to Tokyo. Journal of Research in Personality, 96, 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104168
102.
ZhangJ.ZieglerM.PaulhusD. L. (2020). Development and evaluation of the short Dark Triad-Chinese version (SD3-C). Current Psychology, 39(4), 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-019-00272-3
103.
ZimmermannJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Do we become a different person when hitting the road? Personality development of sojourners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033019
104.
ZuoS.CaiP.HuangN.WangF.WangP. (2023). Population migration damages the natural environment: A multilevel investigation of the relationship between residential mobility and pro-environmental behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(5), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221079451
105.
ZuoS.HuangN.CaiP.WangF. (2018). The lure of antagonistic social strategy in unstable socioecological environment: Residential mobility facilitates individuals’ antisocial behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(3), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.002
106.
ZuoS.WangF.XuY.WangF.ZhaoX. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the Dark Gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual’s self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
