Development of HEXACO Personality Traits and Their Relations With Socioeconomic Factors Among Chinese Adolescents: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study

Abstract

This three-wave longitudinal study investigated the stability and changes in HEXACO personality traits and tested whether socioeconomic factors relate to the initial levels and changes of personality among Chinese adolescents (N = 1,646, Wave 1 M_age = 15.21 years). The findings revealed high rank-order stability of HEXACO personality traits. Consistent with the disruption hypothesis, latent growth modeling revealed significant decreases in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness and a significant increase in Emotionality among boys. Findings also provided evidence contradicting the disruption hypothesis as both boys and girls exhibited an increase in Extraversion, indicating the complexity of developmental trends in personality during adolescence. Conditional latent growth modeling demonstrated that higher childhood and current family socioeconomic status were associated with higher initial levels of Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience, and a lower initial level of Emotionality. Perceived economic inequality was related to a lower initial level of Honesty-Humility and a higher initial level of Openness to Experience. However, socioeconomic factors were not associated with the slopes of personality change. These findings highlight the need for future research to refine the disruption hypothesis and suggest that socioeconomic factors relate to the levels but not changes in personality traits during middle to late adolescence.

Keywords

HEXACO personality development adolescence socioeconomic status economic inequality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2008). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1952–1962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00134.x

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2016). Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports. Journal of Research in Personality, 64, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.008

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2020). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure—and why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, 34(4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

De Vries

R. E.

(2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 18(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

Visser

B. A.

Pozzebon

J. A.

(2008). Phobic tendency within the Five-Factor and HEXACO models of personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(3), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.001

Atherton

O. E.

Sutin

A. R.

Terracciano

Robins

R. W.

(2022). Stability and change in the Big Five personality traits: Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican-origin adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000385

Ayoub

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

Shanahan

Roberts

B. W.

(2018). The relations between parental socioeconomic status, personality, and life outcomes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617707018

10.

Bentler

P. M.

Bonett

D. G.

(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

11.

Bleidorn

Klimstra

T. A.

Denissen

J. J.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Potter

Gosling

S. D.

(2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2530–2540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498396

12.

Borghuis

Denissen

J. J. A.

Oberski

Sijtsma

Meeus

W. H. J.

Branje

Koot

H. M.

Bleidorn

(2017). Big Five personality stability, change, and codevelopment across adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000138

13.

Brandes

C. M.

Kushner

S. C.

Herzhoff

Tackett

J. L.

(2021). Facet-level personality development in the transition to adolescence: Maturity, disruption, and gender differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1095–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000367

14.

Brislin

R. W.

(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

15.

Buttrick

N. R.

Heintzelman

S. J.

Oishi

(2017). Inequality and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.016

16.

Buttrick

N. R.

Oishi

(2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), Article e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304

17.

Caspi

Roberts

B. W.

Shiner

R. L.

(2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913

18.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

19.

Chopik

W. J.

Kitayama

(2018). Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12332

20.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

21.

Conger

R. D.

Conger

K. J.

Martin

M. J.

(2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x

22.

Conger

R. D.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551

23.

Conger

R. D.

Martin

M. J.

Masarik

A. S.

(2021). Dynamic associations among socioeconomic status (SES), parenting investments, and conscientiousness across time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000463

24.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

Löckenhoff

C. E.

(2019). Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244

25.

Davidai

Gilovich

(2015). Building a more mobile America—one income quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 10(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614562005

26.

Desrochers

J. E.

Albert

Milfont

T. L.

Kelly

Arnocky

(2019). Does personality mediate the relationship between sex and environmentalism? Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.026

27.

de Vries

Gosling

Potter

(2011). Income inequality and personality: Are less equal US states less agreeable? Social Science & Medicine, 72(12), 1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.046

28.

de Vries

R. E.

(2013). The 24-item brief HEXACO inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003

29.

de Vries

R. E.

Wawoe

K. W.

Holtrop

(2016). What is engagement? Proactivity as the missing link in the HEXACO model of personality. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12150

30.

de Vries

R. E.

Wesseldijk

L. W.

Karinen

A. K.

Jern

Tybur

J. M.

(2022). Relations between HEXACO personality and ideology variables are mostly genetic in nature. European Journal of Personality, 36(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211014035

31.

Dinić

(2018). Comparison of three short six-factor personality instruments. Primenjena Psihologija, 11(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2018.2.189-206

32.

Chen

Chi

King

R. B.

(2021). Income inequality reduces civic honesty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620929495

33.

Chi

King

R. B.

(2019). Economic inequality is associated with long‐term harm on adolescent well-being in China. Child Development, 90(4), 1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13253

34.

Duckworth

A. L.

Weir

Tsukayama

Kwok

(2012). Who does well in life? Conscientious adults excel in both objective and subjective success. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00356

35.

Dunlop

P. D.

Bharadwaj

A. A.

Parker

S. K.

(2021). Two-year stability and change among the honesty-humility, agreeableness, and conscientiousness scales of the HEXACO100 in an Australian cohort, aged 24–29 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110601

36.

Enders

C. K.

Bandalos

D. L.

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5

37.

Evans

G. W.

Cassells

R. C.

(2014). Childhood poverty, cumulative risk exposure, and mental health in emerging adults. Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2(3), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613501496

38.

Evans

G. W.

Whipple

S. S.

(2013). Cumulative risk and child development. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1342–1396. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031808

39.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

40.

Felner

R. D.

Brand

DuBois

D. L.

Adan

A. M.

Mulhall

P. F.

Evans

E. G.

(1995). Socioeconomic disadvantage, proximal environmental experiences, and socioemotional and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Investigation of a mediated effects model. Child Development, 66(3), 774–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00905.x

41.

Flanagan

C. A.

Kim

Pykett

Finlay

Gallay

E. E.

Pancer

(2014). Adolescents’ theories about economic inequality: Why are some people poor while others are rich? Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2512–2525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037934

42.

Flanagan

C. A.

Kornbluh

(2019). How unequal is the United States? Adolescents’ images of social stratification. Child Development, 90(3), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12954

43.

Fuller

Jr Marler

L. E.

(2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008

44.

García

L. F.

Aluja

Rossier

Ostendorf

Glicksohn

Oumar

Bellaj

Ruch

Wang

Kövi

Ścigała

Čekrlija

Đ.

Stivers

A. W.

Di Blas

Valdivia

Ben Jemaa

Atitsogbe

K. A.

Hansenne

(2022). Exploring the stability of HEXACO-60 structure and the association of gender, age, and social position with personality traits across 18 countries. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12664

45.

Goodman

Slap

G. B.

Huang

(2003). The public health impact of socioeconomic status on adolescent depression and obesity. American Journal of Public Health, 93(11), 1844–1850. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1844

46.

Griskevicius

Tybur

J. M.

Delton

A. W.

Robertson

T. E.

(2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022403

47.

Teng

(2017). The Gaokao experience of Chinese students. In Portraits of Chinese schools (pp. 59–75). Springer.

48.

Heiserman

Simpson

(2021). Measuring perceptions of economic inequality and justice: An empirical assessment. Social Justice Research, 34(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00368-x

49.

Hilbig

B. E.

Glöckner

Zettler

(2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074

50.

Hsieh

H. H.

Huang

J. T.

(2014). The effects of socioeconomic status and proactive personality on career decision self‐efficacy. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00068.x

51.

IBM Corp (2012). SPSS STATISTICS for windows. Version 21.0. IBM Corp.

52.

Israel

Brandt

N. D.

Spengler

Göllner

Lüdtke

Trautwein

Wagner

(2022). The longitudinal interplay of personality and school experiences in adolescence. European Journal of Personality, 37(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211062326

53.

Jachimowicz

J. M.

Szaszi

Lukas

Smerdon

Prabhu

Weber

E. U.

(2020). Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(7), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0849-2

54.

João Pires

M. D.

(2019). Gaokao: Far more than an exam. Revista Diadorim, 21(Esp), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2019.v21nEspa27418

55.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

56.

Julian

A. M.

Novitsky

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2022). Convergent validity of three brief six-factor measures of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 188, 111436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111436

57.

Kandler

Bratko

Butković

Hlupić

T. V.

Tybur

J. M.

Wesseldijk

L. W.

de Vries

R. E.

Jern

Lewis

G. J.

(2021). How genetic and environmental variance in personality traits shift across the life span: Evidence from a cross-national twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000366

58.

Kavanaugh

S. A.

Neppl

T. K.

Melby

J. N.

(2018). Economic pressure and depressive symptoms: Testing the family stress model from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 32(7), 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000462

59.

Klimstra

T. A.

Hale

W. W.

III Raaijmakers

Q. A.

Branje

S. J.

Meeus

W. H.

(2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014746

60.

Kraus

M. W.

Piff

P. K.

Keltner

(2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357

61.

Kraus

M. W.

Piff

P. K.

Mendoza-Denton

Rheinschmidt

M. L.

Keltner

(2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756

62.

Kunst

J. R.

Fischer

Sidanius

Thomsen

(2017). Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(21), 5407–5412. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616572114

63.

Larson

R. W.

Richards

M. H.

Moneta

Holmbeck

Duckett

(1996). Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744

64.

Lechner

C. M.

Bender

Brandt

N. D.

Rammstedt

(2021). Two forms of social inequality in students’ socio-emotional skills: Do the levels of Big Five personality traits and their associations with academic achievement depend on parental socioeconomic status? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 679438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679438

65.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2013). Prediction of self-and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002

66.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134

67.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2020). Sex differences in HEXACO personality characteristics across countries and ethnicities. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12551

68.

Letourneau

N. L.

Duffett-Leger

Levac

Watson

Young-Morris

(2013). Socioeconomic status and child development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611421007

69.

Liang

Crant

J. M.

(2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018079

70.

Yang

Kou

(2020). Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis in China: Objective and subjective socioeconomic status divergently predict system justification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893997

71.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford.

72.

Loughnan

Kuppens

Allik

Balazs

De Lemus

Dumont

Gargurevich

Hidegkuti

Leidner

Matos

Park

Realo

Shi

Sojo

V. E.

Tong

Y. Y.

Vaes

Verduyn

Yeung

Haslam

(2011). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417003

73.

Luan

Hutteman

Denissen

J. J.

Asendorpf

J. B.

van Aken

M. A.

(2017). Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.03.004

74.

Martin

M. J.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2021). Socioeconomic status, parenting investments, and negative personality traits over time and across generations. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000426

75.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr Terracciano

Parker

W. D.

Mills

C. J.

De Fruyt

Mervielde

(2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1456–1468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456

76.

Mittal

Griskevicius

(2016). Silver spoons and platinum plans: How childhood environment affects adult health care decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 636–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw046

77.

Mittal

Griskevicius

Simpson

J. A.

Sung

Young

E. S.

(2015). Cognitive adaptations to stressful environments: When childhood adversity enhances adult executive function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 604–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000028

78.

Moshagen

Thielmann

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2019). Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory (-Revised): Reliability generalization, self–observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000377

79.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2018). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Author.

80.

Napier

J. L.

Jost

J. T.

(2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19(6), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x

81.

Norton

M. I.

Ariely

(2011). Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524

82.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Income inequality update: Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf

83.

Osborne

Satherley

Sibley

C. G.

(in press). Personality and ideology: A metaanalysis of the reliable, but non-causal, association between openness and conservatism. In Mintz

Terris

(Eds.), Oxford handbook on behavioral political science. Oxford University Press.

84.

Payne

B. K.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Hannay

J. W.

(2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114

85.

Peters

Jetten

(2023). How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives. British Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12632

86.

Piotrowska

P. J.

Stride

C. B.

Croft

S. E.

Rowe

(2015). Socioeconomic status and antisocial behaviour among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.003

87.

Pullmann

Raudsepp

Allik

(2006). Stability and change in adolescents’ personality: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 20(6), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.611

88.

Roberts

B. W.

DelVecchio

W. F.

(2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3

89.

Roberts

B. W.

Walton

K. E.

Viechtbauer

(2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1

90.

Roberts

B. W.

Wood

Caspi

(2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In John

O. P.

(Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 375–398). Guilford Press.

91.

Roberts

B. W.

Wood

Smith

J. L.

(2005). Evaluating Five Factor Theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002

92.

Rudert

S. C.

Janke

(2021). Following the crowd in times of crisis: Descriptive norms predict physical distancing, stockpiling, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211023562

93.

Sánchez-Rodríguez

Á.

Willis

G. B.

Jetten

RodríguezBailón

(2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557

94.

Schmalor

Heine

S. J.

(2022). The construct of subjective economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996867

95.

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

Duckitt

(2012). Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of a threat-constraint model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.002

96.

Soto

C. J.

John

O. P.

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

(2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021717

97.

Soto

C. J.

Tackett

J. L.

(2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345

98.

Stamos

Altsitsiadis

Dewitte

(2019). Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust: Lower childhood socioeconomic status predicts lower levels of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.011

99.

Sutin

A. R.

Luchetti

Stephan

Robins

R. W.

Terracciano

(2017). Parental educational attainment and adult offspring personality: An intergenerational life span approach to the origin of adult personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000137

100.

Tang

Xiang

Cheung

Xiang

Y. T.

(2021). Mental health and its correlates among children and adolescents during COVID-19 school closure: The importance of parent-child discussion. Journal of Affective Disorders, 279, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.016

101.

Thielmann

de Vries

R. E.

(2021). Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000304

102.

Thielmann

Moshagen

Hilbig

Zettler

(2021). On the comparability of basic personality models: Meta-analytic correspondence, scope, and orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO dimensions. European Journal of Personality. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211026793

103.

Thielmann

Spadaro

Balliet

(2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217

104.

Van den Akker

A. L.

Deković

Asscher

Prinzie

(2014). Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037248

105.

Van Dijk

M. P.

Hale

W. W.

III Hawk

S. T.

Meeus

Branje

(2020). Personality development from age 12 to 25 and its links with life transitions. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2251

106.

Vukasović

Bratko

(2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000017

107.

Widaman

K. F.

Ferrer

Conger

R. D.

(2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x

108.

Wilkinson

R. G.

Pickett

K. E.

(2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2275

109.

Willis

G. B.

García-Sánchez

Sánchez-Rodríguez

Á.

García-Castro

J. D.

Rodríguez-Bailón

(2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0

110.

Wilmot

M. P.

Ones

D. S.

(2019). A century of research on conscientiousness at work. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(46), 23004–23010. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908430116

111.

Guo

Gao

Kou

(2020). The relations between early-life stress and risk, time, and prosocial preferences in adulthood: A meta-analytic review. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(6), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.09.001

112.

Xie

Zhou

(2014). Income inequality in today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(19), 6928–6933. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403158111

113.

Zettler

Thielmann

Hilbig

B. E.

Moshagen

(2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036

114.

Zhang

Jiang

Ming

Yang

Huang

(2020a). Family socioeconomic status and adolescents’ academic achievement: The moderating roles of subjective social mobility and attention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), 1821–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01287-x

115.

Zhang

Liu

Choi

S. W.

(2020b). Early-life socioeconomic status, adolescent cognitive ability, and cognition in late midlife: Evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Social Science & Medicine, 244, 112575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112575

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB