Individuals differ in the tendency to derive pleasure out of motive-specific incentives, such as being socially included or attaining power. Multiple theoretical approaches have proposed that such motive-specific positive affective contingencies (PACs) are central building blocks of motive dispositions and personality more broadly. In the current research, we put this claim to test and investigated individual differences with regard to motive-specific PACs in the affiliation and power domains. We measured PACs via spontaneous emotional reactions to motive-specific cues, as assessed by affect ratings and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of smile responses. Both of these PAC operationalizations were highly internally consistent and moderately to highly stable across time. Furthermore, motive-specific PACs were linked in a manner consistent with theory to measures of motive dispositions and to personality traits with motivational underpinnings (i.e., extraversion, agreeableness, and narcissism). Finally, in the affiliation domain, motive-specific PACs were linked to objectively assessed, key motivational outcomes (i.e., attentional orientation, behavior in daily life, and in the laboratory). Taken together, the findings underscore the relevance of affective contingencies for the understanding of personality and motivated behavior.
AbrahamsL.RauthmannJ. F.FruytF. D. (2021). Person-situation dynamics in educational contexts: A self- and other-rated experience sampling study of teachers’ states, traits, and situations. European Journal of Personality, 35(4), 598–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211005621
2.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014201
3.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
4.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
5.
BasslerP.DenissenJ. J. A.DufnerM. (2022). Motive perception at zero acquaintance: On the relevance of targets’ explicit and implicit motive dispositions. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
6.
BaumeisterR. FVohsK. DFunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on psychological science2(4): 396–403.
7.
BenjaminD. J.BergerJ. O.JohannessonM.NosekB. A.WagenmakersE. J.BerkR.BollenK. A.BrembsB.BrownL.CamererC.CesariniD.ChambersC. D.ClydeM.CookT. D.De BoeckP.DienesZ.DreberA.EaswaranK.EffersonC.JohnsonV. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
8.
BoyatzisR. E. (1973). Affialtion motivation. In McClellandD. C.SteeleR. S. (Eds.), Human motivation: A book of readings (pp. 252–276). General Learning Cororation.
9.
BradleyM. M.CodispotiM.SabatinelliD.LangP. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.300
10.
BussD. M (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180–207). Guilford Press.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.LoschM. E.KimH. S. (1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.260
12.
CarrollL. (1987). A study of narcissism, affiliation, intimacy, and power motives among students in business administration. Psychological Reports, 61(2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.2.355
13.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212
14.
CorrP. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews28(3): 317–334.
15.
DannerD.RammstedtB.BluemkeM.TreiberL.BerresS.SotoC.JohnO. (2016). Die deutsche version des big five inventory 2 (BFI-2). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS).
16.
DenissenJ. J.PenkeL. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
DepueR. A.CollinsP. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99002046
19.
DepueR. A.Morrone-StrupinskyJ. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: Implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(3), 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000063
20.
DonB. P.FredricksonB. L.AlgoeS. B. (2022). Enjoying the sweet moments: Does approach motivation upwardly enhance reactivity to positive interpersonal processes?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(6), 1022–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000312
21.
DuchowskiA. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Springer.
22.
DufnerM.ArslanR. C.DenissenJ. J. A. (2018). The unconscious side of Facebook: Do online social network profiles leak cues to users’ implicit motive dispositions?Motivation and Emotion, 42(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9663-1
23.
DufnerM.ArslanR. C.HagemeyerB.SchönbrodtF. D.DenissenJ. J. A. (2015). Affective contingencies in the affiliative domain: Physiological assessment, associations with the affiliation motive, and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000025
24.
DufnerM.LeisingD.GebauerJ. E. (2016). Which basic rules underlie social judgments? Agency follows a zero-sum principle and communion follows a non-zero-sum principle. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 42(5), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216640902
25.
DweckC. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
26.
EntwisleD. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77(6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020021
27.
FeighnerJ. P.RobinsE.GuzeS. B.WoodruffR. A.JrWinokurG.MunozR. (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2001). Appetitive and aversive social interaction. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA. E. (Eds.), Close romantic relationship: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 169–194). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
30.
GrapsasS.BrummelmanE.BackM. D.DenissenJ. J. A. (2020). The “why” and “how” of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on psychological science: a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619873350
31.
GrapsasS.BrummelmanE.DufnerM.DenissenJ. J. (2022). Affective contingencies of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 123(2), 444–462.
32.
GroszM. P.HarmsP. D.DufnerM.KraftL.WetzelE. (2020). Reducing the overlap between machiavellianism and subclinical psychopathy: The M7 and P7 scales. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.17799
33.
HagemeyerB.DufnerM.DenissenJ. J. (2016). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit affiliative motives: A closer look at socializing behavior in dyadic interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 65(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.003
34.
HendinH. M.CheekJ. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of murray’s narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
35.
HessU.ArslanR.MauersbergerH.BlaisonC.DufnerM.DenissenJ. J. A.ZieglerM. (2017). Reliability of surface facial electromyography. Psychophysiology, 54(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12676
36.
HoganR. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In PageM. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 55–89). University of Nebraska Press.
37.
HoganR. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 163–179). Guilford Press.
38.
HubbardJ.HarbaughW. T.SrivastavaS.DegrasD.MayrU. (2016). A general benevolence dimension that links neural, psychological, economic, and life-span data on altruistic tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(10), 1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000209
JänckeL. (1994). An EMG investigation of the coactivation of facial muscles during the presentation of affect-laden stimuli. Journal of Psychophysiology, 8(1), 1–10.
41.
JansonK. T.KöllnerM. G.KhalaidovskiK.PülschenL.-S.RudnayaA.StammL.SchultheissO. C. (2021). Motive-modulated attentional orienting: Implicit power motive predicts attentional avoidance of signals of interpersonal dominance. Motivation Science. 8(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000254
42.
JobV.BerneckerK.DweckC. S. (2012). Are implicit motives the need to feel certain affect? Motive–affect congruence predicts relationship satisfaction. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 38(12), 1552–1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212454920
43.
KrauseS.DufnerM. (2020). The predictive validity of explicit and implicit partner evaluations for relationship behaviors: An actor–partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(5), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1625910
44.
KrizanZ.HerlacheA. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and social psychology review: an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018
45.
KuhlJ. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). Academic Press.
46.
LangJ. W. B. (2014). A dynamic Thurstonian item response theory of motive expression in the picture story exercise: Solving the internal consistency paradox of the PSE. Psychological Review, 121(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037011
47.
LarsenJ. T.NorrisC. J.CacioppoJ. T. (2003). Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00078
48.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Ronald Press Co.
49.
MahadevanN.JordanC. (2021). Desperately seeking status: How desires for, and perceived attainment of, status and inclusion relate to grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 48(5), 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021189
McAdamsD. P.PalsJ. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
52.
McClellandD. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In WheelerL. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 10–41). Sage.
53.
McClellandD. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.
54.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W. (1948). The projective expression of needs: I. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on perception. The Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917371
55.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR. A.LowellE. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
56.
McClellandD. C.KoestnerR.WeinbergerJ. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
57.
McClellandD. C.PilonD. A. (1983). Sources of adult motives in patterns of parent behavior in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.564
58.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
59.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
60.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
61.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246
62.
MooreS. R.FuY.DepueR. A. (2014). Social traits modulate attention to affiliative cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1), 649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00649
63.
MorfC. C.SchürchE.KüfnerA.SiegristP.VaterA.BackM.MestelR.Schröder-AbéM. (2017). Expanding the nomological net of the pathological narcissism inventory: German validation and extension in a clinical inpatient sample. Assessment, 24(4), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115627010
64.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press.
PangJ. S. (2010). Content coding methods in implicit motive assessment: Standards of measurement and best practices for the picture story exercise. In SchultheissO. C.BrunsteinJ. C. (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 119–150). University Press.
67.
PangJ. S.SchultheissO. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in US college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_04
68.
PeruginiM.HagemeyerB.WrzusC.BackM. D. (2021). Dual process models of personality. In The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 551–577). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00020-0
69.
QuintusM.EgloffB.WrzusC. (2021). Daily life processes predict long-term development in explicit and implicit representations of Big Five traits: Testing predictions from the TESSERA (Triggering situations, Expectancies, States and State Expressions, and ReActions) framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1049–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000361
70.
RauR.CarlsonE. N.DufnerM.GeukesK.KraftL.KrauseS.NikoleizigL.NestlerS.BackM.D. (2021). Positivity in peer perceptions over time: Personality explains variation at zero-acquaintance, popularity explains differential change. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology. 123(2), 423–443.
71.
RogozaR.CieciuchJ.StrusW. (2021). Narcissistic isolation and enmity concept: Disentangling the blue and dark face of vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality. 96(1), 104167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104167
72.
SchönbrodtF. D.GerstenbergF. X. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The unified motive scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010
73.
SchülerJ.BrandstätterV.WegnerM.BaumannN. (2015). Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG. Motivation and Emotion, 39(6), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9502-1
74.
SchultheissO. C (2008). Implicit motives. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3 ed., pp. 603–633).
75.
SchultheissO. C.KöllnerM. G. (2021). Implicit motives. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4 ed., pp. 385–410). The Guilford Press.
76.
SchultheissO. C.PangJ. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). Guilford Press.
77.
SchultheissO. C.SchultheissM. (2014). Implicit motive profile analysis: An if then contingency approach to the picture story exercise. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12082
78.
SmithC. P.AtkinsonJ. W.McClellandD. C.VeroffJ. (Eds.), (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527937
79.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
80.
StantonS. J.HallJ. L.SchultheissO. C. (2010). Properties of motive-specific incentives. In SchultheissO. C.BrunsteinJ. C. (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 245–278). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335156.003.0009
81.
SuessenbachF.LoughnanS.SchönbrodtF. D.MooreA. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2184
82.
Tassinary, L. G., Hess, U., & Carcoba, L. M. (2012). Peripheral physiological measures of psychological constructs. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. (pp. 461–488):Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83.
TracyJ. L.WeidmanA. C.ChengJ. T.MartensJ. P. (2014). Pride: The fundamental emotion of success, power, and status. In TugadeM. M.ShiotaM. N.KirbyL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of positive emotions (pp. 149–310). The Guilford Press.
84.
Trizano-HermosillaI.AlvaradoJ. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
85.
WallerR.CorbettN.RaineA.WagnerN. J.BroussardA.EdmondsD.ReardonS.JonesC.Itkin-OferM.SchellT.NeumannC. S. (2021). Reduced sensitivity to affiliation and psychopathic traits. Personality disorders, 12(5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000423
86.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00980.x
87.
WeinbrechtA.SchulzeL.BoettcherJ.RennebergB. (2016). Avoidant personality disorder: A current review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 18(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0665-6
88.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
89.
WinterD. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (4th ed.). Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. Unpublished Manuscript.
90.
WoodD.GardnerM. H.HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038423
91.
WrzusC.RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and social psychology review: an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 21(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
