Abstract
Purpose
This study examines community and provider perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to identify barriers and interventions for improving screening rates.
Approach or Design
A mixed methods research design using focus groups with community members and semi-structured interviews with health care providers in counties with the highest and lowest CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Data analysis was guided by the TPB.
Setting
North Dakota counties with the highest and lowest CRC MIRs, covering urban and rural populations.
Participants
Twenty community members aged 50+ (18 women, 2 men) participated in 5 in-person and 3 virtual focus groups. Eight health care providers, including physicians and nurse practitioners, were interviewed virtually.
Method
Focus groups and interviews were conducted between summer and fall 2023. Discussions were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using Dedoose, guided by the TPB.
Results
Top barriers included access to screening (total codes, n = 183), fear/stigma (n = 126), provider communication (n = 80), cost (n = 67), and travel (n = 58). Community members relied on social networks over providers for screening decisions. No significant differences emerged between high- and low-MIR counties, nor between rural and urban, indicating systemic rather than geographic barriers.
Conclusion
Findings suggest improving provider communication, leveraging trusted social networks, addressing stigma, and reducing barriers to screening (eg, cost, transportation). Future interventions should prioritize community-informed health promotion efforts to increase CRC screening rates and improve health equity.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
