We investigate how individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) seek, access, and evaluate traditional and online sources they rely on for health information.
Design
Retrospective cross-sectional survey analysis from the United States.
Setting
Pooled Health Information National Trends Survey surveys (2013-2019).
Subjects
The sample was comprised 15,316 respondents; 236/15,316 (1.54%) completed the survey in Spanish and 1727/14,734 (11.72%) had LEP (did not speak English “very well”). The sample was nationally representative across demographic categories.
Measures
Independent and dependent variables were self-reported using validated measures.
Analysis
Multivariable logistic regression models using jackknife replicate weights for population estimates.
Results
Adults with LEP were less confident in their capacity to access health information (aOR = 0.59, CI: 0.47-0.75) and had less trust in health information from medical professionals (aOR = 0.57,CI: 0.46-0.72) than English proficient (EP) adults. Although LEP and EP adults were both most likely to use the internet as their first source of information, LEP adults were more likely than EP adults to consult health professionals, print sources like books, news or brochures, family and friends, television and radio. Spanish language survey respondents were more likely to trust health information from government agencies (aOR = 1.99, CI: 1.09-3.62) and watch health-related videos on the internet than respondents who took the survey in English (aOR = 2.51, CI: 1.23-5.12).
Conclusion
Our results show how language barriers may contribute to health disparities experienced by linguistic minorities. Government agencies and health care organizations need to promote health information dissemination in underserved communities and may need to embrace the use of alternative information sources such as television, radio, and the internet to reach LEP populations.
CaseDOGivenLM. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 4th ed.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2016.
2.
GalarceEMRamanadhanSViswanathK. In: ThompsonTLParrottRNussbaumJF, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Health Information. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:167-180.
3.
SatoKViswanathKHayashiH, et al.Association between exposure to health information and mortality: reduced mortality among women exposed to information via TV programs. Soc Sci Med. 2019;221:124-131.
4.
JungMLinLViswanathK. Associations between health communication behaviors, neighborhood social capital, vaccine knowledge, and parents’ H1N1 vaccination of their children. Vaccine. 2013;31(42):4860-4866.
5.
SwobodaCMWalkerDMHuertaT. Odds of meeting cancer prevention behavior recommendations by health information seeking behavior: a cross-sectional HINTS analysis. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(1):56-64.
6.
MirzaeiAAslaniPLucaEJSchneiderCR. Predictors of health information–seeking behavior: systematic literature review and network analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e21680.
7.
Finney RuttenLJAgunwambaAAWilsonP, et al.Cancer-related information seeking among cancer survivors: trends over a decade (2003–2013). J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):348-357.
8.
Adjei BoakyeEMohammedKAGeneusCJ, et al.Correlates of health information seeking between adults diagnosed with and without cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196446.
9.
Blanch-HartiganDViswanathK. Socioeconomic and sociodemographic predictors of cancer-related information sources used by cancer survivors. J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):204-210.
10.
JacobsWAmutaAOJeonKC. Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3(1):1302785.
11.
Shea-BudgellMAKostarasXMyhillKPHagenNA. Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(4):165-173.
12.
LeeHYJinSWHenning-SmithCLeeJLeeJ. Role of health literacy in health-related information-seeking behavior online: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e14088.
13.
MyrickJGWilloughbyJF. Educated but anxious: how emotional states and education levels combine to influence online health information seeking. Health Inf J. 2019;25(3):649-660.
14.
SbaffiLRowleyJ. Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e218.
15.
SwobodaCMVan HulleJMMcAlearneyASHuertaTR. Odds of talking to healthcare providers as the initial source of healthcare information: updated cross-sectional results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):146.
16.
FareedNSwobodaCMJonnalagaddaPWalkerDMHuertaTR. Differences between races in health information seeking and trust over time: evidence from a cross-sectional, pooled analyses of HINTS data. Am J Health Promot. 2021;35(1):84-92.
17.
SmithD. Health care consumer’s use and trust of health information sources. J Commun Healthc. 2011;4(3):200-210.
18.
RamírezASFreresDMartinezLS, et al.Information seeking from media and family/friends increases the likelihood of engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors. J Health Commun. 2013;18(5):527-542.
19.
WigfallLTFriedmanDB. Cancer information seeking and cancer-related health outcomes: a scoping review of the health information national trends survey literature. J Health Commun. 2016;21(9):989-1005.
20.
TanSSLGoonawardeneN. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e9.
21.
ZhangLJungEHChenZ. Modeling the pathway linking health information seeking to psychological well-being on WeChat. Health Commun. 2020;35(9):1101-1112.
22.
ImeriHDesselleSHetemiDHotiK. Mobile electronic devices as means of facilitating patient activation and health professional empowerment related to information seeking on chronic conditions and medications: qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(8):e26300.
23.
OhHJLaucknerCBoehmerJFewins-BlissRLiK. Facebooking for health: an examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(5):2072-2080.
24.
MoorheadSAHazlettDEHarrisonLCarrollJKIrwinAHovingC. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85.
25.
LeeYJBoden-AlbalaBJiaHWilcoxABakkenS. The association between online health information–seeking behaviors and health behaviors among hispanics in New York city: a community-based cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e261.
26.
SoJKuangKChoH. Information seeking upon exposure to risk messages: predictors, outcomes, and mediating roles of health information seeking. Commun Res. 2019;46(5):663-687.
27.
SamalLSahaSChanderG, et al.Internet health information seeking behavior and antiretroviral adherence in persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25(7):445-449.
ChuJNSarkarURivadeneiraNAHiattRAKhoongEC. Impact of language preference and health literacy on health information-seeking experiences among a low-income, multilingual cohort. Patient Educ Counsel. 2022;105(5):1268-1275.
30.
FeinbergIFrijtersJJohnson-LawrenceVGreenbergDNightingaleEMoodieC. Examining associations between health information seeking behavior and adult education status in the U.S.: an analysis of the 2012 PIAAC data. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148751.
31.
SavolainenR. Approaches to socio-cultural barriers to information seeking. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2016;38(1):52-59.
32.
MillarRJSahooSYamashitaTCumminsPA. Literacy skills, language use, and online health information seeking among Hispanic adults in the United States. Patient Educ Counsel. 2020;103(8):1595-1600.
33.
Al ShamsiHAlmutairiAGAl MashrafiSAl KalbaniT. Implications of language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman Med J. 2020;35(2):e122.
34.
PandeyMMainaRGAmoyawJ, et al.Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use, and outcomes among immigrants: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):741.
35.
ClarkeMAMooreJLSteegeLM, et al.Health information needs, sources, and barriers of primary care patients to achieve patient-centered care: a literature review. Health Inf J. 2016;22(4):992-1016.
36.
FareedNJonnalagaddaPSwobodaCMSamineniPGriesenbrockTHuertaT. Socioeconomic factors influence health information seeking and trust over time: evidence from a cross-sectional, pooled analyses of HINTS data. Am J Health Promot. 2021;35(8):1084-1094.
37.
McCloudRFOkechukwuCASorensenGViswanathK. Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2016;23(6):1053-1059.
38.
Finney RuttenLJBlakeKDSkolnickVGDavisTMoserRPHesseBW. Data resource profile: the national cancer Institute’s health information national trends survey (HINTS). Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(1):17.
MoserRPNaveedSCantorD, et al.Integrative analytic methods using population-level cross-sectional data. 2013.
41.
WilsonTD. Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective. Inf Process Manag. 1997;33(4):551-572.
42.
MirzaeiAAslaniPLucaEJSchneiderCR. Predictors of health information–seeking behavior: systematic literature review and network analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e21680.
43.
RuppelEK. Scanning health information sources: applying and extending the comprehensive model of information seeking. J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):208-216.
44.
SahaSArbelaezJJCooperLA. Patient–physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1713-1719.
45.
YeheskelARawalS. Exploring the ‘patient experience’ of individuals with limited English proficiency: a scoping review. J Immigr Minority Health. 2019;21(4):853-878.
46.
Al ShamsiHAlmutairiAGAl MashrafiSAl KalbaniT. Implications of language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman Med J. 2020;35(2):e122.
47.
FieldsAAbrahamMGaughanJHainesCHoehnKS. Language matters: race, trust, and outcomes in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32(4):222-226.
48.
DaggettAAbdollahiSHashemzadehM. The effect of language concordance on health care relationship trust score. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39530.
49.
MolinaRLKasperJ. The power of language-concordant care: a call to action for medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):378.
50.
ButowPNSzeMDugal-BeriP, et al.From inside the bubble: migrants’ perceptions of communication with the cancer team. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(2):281-290.
51.
SentellTBraunKL. Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in asians, latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3(sup3):82-99.
52.
RamirezASGraffKNelsonD, et al.Who seeks cita con el doctor ? Twelve years of Spanish-language radio program targeting U.S. Latinos. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(5):611-620.
53.
SteelFisherGKCaporelloHLLubellKM, et al.Getting critical information during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of Spanish and Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency. Health Secur. 2022;20(4):273-285.
54.
ChenXHayJLWatersEA, et al.Health literacy and use and trust in health information. J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):724-734.
55.
CarboneETZoellnerJM. Nutrition and health literacy: a systematic review to inform nutrition research and practice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(2):254-265.
56.
YamashitaTBardoARLiuDCumminsPA. Literacy, numeracy, and health information seeking among middle-aged and older adults in the United States. J Aging Health. 2020;32(1–2):33-41.
57.
EscofferyCRiehmanKWatsonL, et al.Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the HPV VACs (vaccinate adolescents against cancers) program: a consolidated framework for implementation research analysis. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E85.
58.
DiamondLCJacobsEAKarlinerL. Providing equitable care to patients with limited dominant language proficiency amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Educ Counsel. 2020;103(8):1451-1452.
59.
IngrahamNEPurcellLNKaramBS, et al.Racial and ethnic disparities in hospital admissions from COVID-19: determining the impact of neighborhood deprivation and primary language. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(11):3462-3470.
60.
McCafferyKDoddRCvejicE, et al.Health literacy and disparities in COVID-19–related knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours in Australia. Public Health Res Pract. 2020;30(4):30342012.
61.
TzeliosCContrerasCIstenesB, et al.Using digital chatbots to close gaps in healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Action. 2022;12(4):180-185.
62.
MashRSchouwDFischerAE. Evaluating the implementation of the GREAT4Diabetes WhatsApp chatbot to educate people with type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic: convergent mixed methods study. JMIR Diabetes. 2022;7(2):e37882.
63.
RaineyJPBlackburnBEMcCutcheonCL, et al.A multilingual chatbot can effectively engage arthroplasty patients who have limited English proficiency. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(7):S78-S83.
64.
ChewningBBylundCLShahBAroraNKGueguenJAMakoulG. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Counsel. 2012;86(1):9-18.
65.
ChaeSLeeYJHanHR. Sources of health information, technology access, and use among non–English-speaking immigrant women: descriptive correlational study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(10):e29155.
66.
DohanDLevintovaM. Barriers beyond words: cancer, culture, and translation in a community of Russian speakers. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(S2):300-305.
67.
Pérez-StableEJEl-ToukhyS. Communicating with diverse patients: how patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ Counsel. 2018;101(12):2186-2194.
68.
DavisCMGuoMMiyamuraJChangANelson-HurwitzDCSentellT. Key factors in obstetric delivery decision-making among asian and pacific islander women by English proficiency. Hawai‘i J Med Public Health. 2017;76(10):279-286.
69.
GravesJMMooreMGonzalezCRamosJNguyenLVavilalaMS. Too little information: accessibility of information about language services on hospital websites. J Immigr Minority Health. 2020;22(3):433-438.
70.
CaloWACubillosLBreenJ, et al.Experiences of Latinos with limited English proficiency with patient registration systems and their interactions with clinic front office staff: an exploratory study to inform community-based translational research in North Carolina. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):570.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
