Identify the effects of engagement with different intervention delivery channels on physical activity (PA), and the participant subgroups engaging with the different channels, among Women’s Health Initiative Strong and Healthy (WHISH) PA trial participants.
Design
Secondary analysis of data from WHISH, a pragmatic trial that used passive randomized consent.
Setting
United States (remote intervention in all 50 states).
Sample
18,080 U.S. women, aged 68-99 years, assigned to the WHISH PA intervention arm.
Measures
6 dichotomous variables operationalized engagement: Engagement with Targeted Inserts, Email (opened), Email (clicked links), Website (logging in), Website (tracking), Interactive Voice Response (IVR). PA was measured using the CHAMPS PA questionnaire.
Analysis
Linear regressions evaluated effects of engagement on PA. Conditional Inference Trees identified subgroups of participants engaging with different channels based on demographic and psychosocial variables.
Results
Engagement with each channel, except IVR, was associated with significantly more hours/week of PA (square root coefficients .29 - .13, P values <.001). Consistently across channels, features that identified subgroups of participants with higher engagement included younger age, and higher levels of PA and physical function. Subgroups with the highest engagement differed from those with the lowest in most participant characteristics.
Conclusions
For equitable population-level impact via large-scale remotely-delivered PA programs, it may be necessary to identify strategies to engage and target harder to reach subgroups more precisely.
Clinical Trial Registration
The WHISH trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02425345).
CunninghamCO’ SullivanRCaserottiPTullyMA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports. May 2020;30(5):816-827. doi:10.1111/sms.13616.
2.
SavikangasTTirkkonenAAlenM, et al.Associations of physical activity in detailed intensity ranges with body composition and physical function. a cross-sectional study among sedentary older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. Jan 2020;17(1):4. doi:10.1186/s11556-020-0237-y.
3.
SherringtonCMichaleffZAFairhallN, et al.Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. Dec 2017;51(24):1750-1758. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096547.
4.
EtnierJLDrolletteESSlutskyAB. Physical activity and cognition: a narrative review of the evidence for older adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. May 2019;42:156-166. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.006.
5.
ZhangSXiangKLiSJPanHF. Physical activity and depression in older adults: the knowns and unknowns. Psychiatr Res. 2021;297:297113738. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113738.
6.
KeadleSKMcKinnonRGraubardBITroianoRP. Prevalence and trends in physical activity among older adults in the United States: a comparison across three national surveys. Prev Med. Aug 2016;89:37-43. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.009.
7.
PiercyKLTroianoRPBallardRM, et al.The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. Nov 2018;320(19):2020-2028. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
8.
FriedenreichCMCourneyaKSNeilsonHK, et al.Reliability and validity of the past year total physical activity questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. May 2006;163(10):959-970. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj112.
9.
ChaseJAD. Physical activity interventions among older adults: a literature review. Res Theor Nurs Pract. 2013;27(1):53-80. doi:10.1891/1541-6577.27.1.53.
10.
KingACWhitt-GloverMCMarquezDX, et al.Physical activity promotion: highlights from the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1340-1353. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001945.
11.
KingACAhnDFAtienzaAAKraemerHC. Exploring refinements in targeted behavioral medicine intervention to advance public health. Ann Behav Med. Jun 2008;35(3):251-260. doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9032-0.
12.
KingAC. Behavioral medicine in the 21st century: transforming “the road less traveled” into the “American way of life”. Ann Behav Med. Feb. 2014;47(1):71-78. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9530-6.
13.
DonkinLChristensenHNaismithSLNealBHickieIBGlozierN. A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies. J Med Internet Res. Jul-Sep 2011;13(3):e52. doi:10.2196/jmir.1772.
14.
RichardsonAGrahamALCobbN, et al.Engagement promotes abstinence in a web-based cessation intervention: cohort study. J Med Internet Res. Jan 2013;15(1):e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.2277.
15.
CouperMPAlexanderGLZhangNH, et al.Engagement and retention: measuring breadth and depth of participant use of an online intervention. J Med Internet Res. Oct-Dec 2010;12(4):41-55. e52. doi:10.2196/jmir.1430.
16.
SchmidtJAGrumanCKingMBWolfsonLI. Attrition in an exercise intervention: a comparison of early and later dropouts. J Am Geriatr Soc. Aug 2000;48(8):952-960. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06894.x.
17.
JanceyJLeeAHowatPClarkeAWangKShiltonT. Reducing attrition in physical activity programs for older adults. J Aging Phys Activ. Apr 2007;15(2):152-165. doi:10.1123/japa.15.2.152.
18.
BoekhoutJMPeelsDABerendsenBAJBolmanCLechnerL. A web-based and print-delivered computer-tailored physical activity intervention for older adults: pretest-posttest intervention study comparing delivery mode preference and attrition. J Med Internet Res. Aug 2019;21(8):e13416. doi:10.2196/13416.
19.
MartinKASindenAR. Who will stay and who will go? A review of older adults’ adherence to randomized controlled trials of exercise. J Aging Phys Activ. Apr 2001;9(2):91-114. doi:10.1123/japa.9.2.91.
20.
MarcusBHNapolitanoMAKingAC, et al.Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: project STRIDE. Health Psychol. Jul 2007;26(4):401-409. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.401.
21.
MarcusBHLewisBAWilliamsDM, et al.A comparison of Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. Arch Intern Med. May 2007;167(9):944-949. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.9.944.
22.
AndersonMPerrinA. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2017.
23.
VandelanotteCMullerAMShortCE, et al.Past, present, and future of eHealth and mHealth research to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav. Mar. 2016;48(3):219-228. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.12.006.
24.
StefanickMLKooperbergCLaCroixAZ. Women’s Health Initiative Strong and Healthy (WHISH): a pragmatic physical activity intervention trial for cardiovascular disease prevention. Contemp Clin Trials. Aug 2022;119:106815. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106815.
25.
StefanickMLKingACMackeyS, et al.Women’s health initiative Strong and healthy pragmatic physical activity intervention trial for cardiovascular disease prevention: design and baseline characteristics. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Apr 2021;76(4):725-734. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaa325.
26.
BanduraA. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
27.
ProchaskaJOReddingCAEversKE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 34th ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:189-210.
28.
AndersonGCummingsSFreedmanLS, et al.Design of the women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. Feb. 1998;19(1):61-109.
29.
AndersonGLLimacherMAssafAR, et al.Effects of conjugated, equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy - the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1701-1712. doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1701.
30.
ZelenM. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1242-1245. doi:10.1056/NEJM197905313002203.
31.
FollisSBreathettKGarciaL, et al.Quantifying structural racism in cohort studies to advance prospective evidence. SSM-Popul Health. Jun 2023;22:101417. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101417.
32.
StewartWFRicciJACheeEHahnSRMorgansteinD. Cost of lost productive work time among US workers with depression. JAMA. 2003;289(23):3135-3144. doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3135.
33.
HaradaNDChiuVKingACStewartAL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jun. 2001;33(6):962-970. doi:10.1097/00005768-200106000-00016.
34.
ColbertLHMatthewsCEHavighurstTCKimKSchoellerDA. Comparative validity of physical activity measures in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. May 2011;43(5):867-876. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fc7162.
35.
HaysRDSherbourneCDMazelRM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217-227.
36.
SaykinAJWishartHARabinLA, et al.Older adults with cognitive complaints show brain atrophy similar to that of amnestic MCI. Neurology. Sep. 2006;67(5):834-842. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000234032.77541.a2.
KiernanMKraemerHCWinklebyMAKingACTaylorCB. Do logistic regression and signal detection identify different subgroups at risk? Implications for the design of tailored interventions. Psychol Methods. Mar. 2001;6(1):35-48. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.6.1.35.
39.
KingACSalvoDBandaJA, et al.An observational study identifying obese subgroups among older adults at increased risk of mobility disability: do perceptions of the neighborhood environment matter?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2015;12:157.
40.
HanniKDAhnDAWinklebyMA. Signal detection analysis of factors associated with diabetes among semirural Mexican American adults. Hisp J Behav Sci. May 2013;35(2):260-277. doi:10.1177/0739986312471824.
41.
KingACGoldbergJHSalmonJ, et al.Identifying subgroups of US adults at risk for prolonged television viewing to inform program development. Am J Prev Med. Jan. 2010;38(1):17-26. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.032.
42.
KingACKiernanMOmanRFKraemerHCHullMAhnD. Can we identify who will adhere to long-term physical activity? Signal detection methodology as a potential aid to clinical decision making. Health Psychol. Jul. 1997;16(4):380-389. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.380.
43.
Howard-PitneyBWinklebyMA. Chewing tobacco: who uses and who quits? Findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994. Am J Publ Health. Feb 2002;92(2):250-256. doi:10.2105/ajph.92.2.250.
44.
LinkeSEDunsigerSIGansKM, et al.Association between physical activity intervention website use and physical activity levels among Spanish-speaking Latinas: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. Jul 2019;21(7):e13063. doi:10.2196/13063.
45.
EstabrooksPASmith-RayRL. Piloting a behavioral intervention delivered through interactive voice response telephone messages to promote weight loss in a pre-diabetic population. Patient Educ Couns. Jul. 2008;72(1):34-41. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.007.
46.
CzwiklaGBoenFCookDG, et al.Equity-specific effects of interventions to promote physical activity among middle-aged and older adults: development of a collaborative equity-specific Re-analysis strategy. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. Sep 2019;16(17):3195. doi:10.3390/ijerph16173195.
47.
Mendoza-VasconezASLinkeSMunozM, et al.Promoting physical activity among underserved populations. Curr Sports Med Rep. Jul-Aug 2016;15(4):290-297.
48.
ClelandVGranadosACrawfordDWinzenbergTBallK. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. Mar. 2013;14(3):197-212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01058.x.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
