BarberMMcCartyN. Causes and consequences of polarization. In: MansbridgeJMartinCJ, eds Political Negotiation: A Handbook. Brookings Institution Press. 2015:39-43.
2.
FinkelEJBailCACikaraM, et al.Political sectarianism in America. Science. 2020;370(6516):533-536.
3.
IyengarSLelkesYLevenduskyMMalhotraNWestwoodSJ. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2019;22(1):129-146.
NealZP. A sign of the times? Weak and strong polarization in the US Congress 1973–2016. Soc Networks. 2020;60:103-112.
8.
InbarYLammersJ. Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(5):496-503.
9.
MernykJSPinkSLDruckmanJNWillerR. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(16):e2116851119.
10.
LeesJCikaraM. Understanding and combating misperceived polarization. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021;376(1822):20200143.
11.
van BaarJMFeldmanHallO. 2022, The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization. Am Psychol. 2022;77:394-408.
12.
BowesSMBlanchardMCCostelloTHAbramowitzAILilienfeldSO. Intellectual humility and between-party animus: Implications for affective polarization in two community samples. J Res Pers. 2020;88:103992.
13.
BowesSMCostelloTHLeeCMcElroy-HeltzelSDavisDELilienfeldSO. Stepping outside the echo chamber: Is intellectual humility associated with less political myside bias?Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022;48(1):150-164.
14.
Krumrei-MancusoEJNewmanB. Intellectual humility in the sociopolitical domain. Self Identity. 2020;19(8):989-1016.
15.
StanleyMLSinclairAHSeliP. Intellectual humility and perceptions of political opponents. J Pers. 2020;88(6):1196-1216.
16.
PorterTBaldwinCRWarrenMT, et al.Clarifying the content of intellectual humility: A systematic review and integrative framework. J Pers Assess. 104, 573, 585, 2021.
17.
LearyMRDiebelsKJDavissonEK, et al.Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017;43(6):793-813.
18.
AlfanoMIurinoKSteyP, et al.Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of intellectual humility. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182950.
19.
Krumrei-MancusoEJRouseSV. The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. J Pers Assess. 2016;98(2):209-221.
20.
AbramowitzAISaundersKL. Is polarization a myth?J Polit. 2008;70(2):542-555.
21.
FiorinaMPAbramsSAPopeJC. Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. J Polit. 2008;70(2):556-560.
22.
The Partisan Divide on Political Views Grows Even Wider. Pew Research Center. 2017.
23.
HoyleRHDavissonEKDiebelsKJLearyMR. Holding specific views with humility: Conceptualization and measurement of specific intellectual humility. Pers Individ Diff. 2016;97:165-172.
24.
HuberGAMalhotraN. Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. J Polit. 2017;79(1):269-283.
25.
IyengarSWestwoodSJ. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. Am J Pol Sci. 2015;59(3):690-707.
26.
PorterTSchumannK. Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self Identity. 2018;17(2):139-162.
27.
SgambatiTJ. Intellectual Humility and the Polarization of Attitudes. Presented at: The University of California, Berkeley Institute for Personality and Social Research colloquium series; 2020; Berkeley, CA.
28.
PettigrewTFTroppLR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90(5):751-783.
29.
PettigrewTFTroppLR. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2008;38(6):922-934.
30.
EndersAMArmalyMT. The differential effects of actual and perceived polarization. Polit Behav. 2019;41(3):815-839.
31.
StanleyMLWhiteheadPSSinnott-ArmstrongWSeliP. Exposure to opposing reasons reduces negative impressions of ideological opponents. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020;91:104030.
32.
Del VicarioMVivaldoGBessiAZolloFScalaACaldarelliG, et al. . Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on Facebook. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1-12.
33.
IsenbergDJ. Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50(6):1141-1151.
34.
LevyGRazinR. Echo chambers and their effects on economic and political outcomes. Annu Rev Econom. 2019;11:303-328.
35.
HookJNFarrellJEJohnsonKAVan TongerenDRDavisDEAtenJD. Intellectual humility and religious tolerance. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(1):29-35.
36.
KoetkeJSchumannKPorterT. Intellectual humility predicts scrutiny of COVID-19 misinformation. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022;13(1):277-284.
KrossEGrossmannI. Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(1):43-48.
39.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;96(5):1029-1046.
40.
LevenduskyMSMalhotraN. (Mis) perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opin Q. 2016;80(S1):378-391.
41.
TetlockPESkitkaLBoettgerR. Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(4):632-640.