Optimizing Team Effectiveness: Key Takeaways From the Science With a Focus on the Virtual Context

Mathieu JE Gallagher PT Domingo MA Klock EA . Embracing complexity: reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2019;6:17–46.

Bisbey TM Reyes DL Traylor AM Salas E . Teams of psychologists helping teams: the evolution of the science of team training. Am Psychol. 2019;74(3):278–289.

Martins LL Gilson LL Maynard MT . Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here? J Manage. 2004;30(6):805–835.

Ilgen DR Hollenbeck JR Johnson M Jundt D . Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:517–543.

Tuckman BW . Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull. 1965;63(6):384–399.

Mathieu JE Rapp TL . Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: the roles of team charters and performance strategies. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):90–103.

Edmondson A . Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–383.

Edmondson AC Lei Z . Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43.

Blackburn R Furst SA Rosen B. Building a winning virtual team: KSA’s, selections, training, and evaluation. In Gibson Cohen SG , eds. Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass; 2003.

Gilson LL Maynard MT Jones Young NC Vartiainen M Hakonen M . Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J Manage. 2015;41(5):1313–1337.

Kayworth T Leidner D . The global virtual manager: a prescription for success. Eur Manag J. 2000;18(2):183–194.

Tannenbaum SI Traylor AM Thomas EJ Salas E . Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: evidence-based tips. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;30(1):59–63.

Feitosa J Salas E . Today’s virtual teams: adapting lessons learned to the pandemic context [published online June 24, 2020]. Organ Dyn. 2020.

Mohammed S Ferzandi L Hamilton K . Metaphor no more: a 15-year review of the team mental model construct. J Manage. 2010;36(4):876–910.

Austin JR . Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;88(5):866–878.

Mathieu J Maynard MT Rapp T Gilson L . Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008;34(3):410–476.

Gully SM Incalcaterra KA Joshi A Beaubien JM . A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;87(5):819–832.

Feitosa J Grossman R Kramer WS Salas E . Measuring team trust: a critical and meta-analytical review. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(5):479–501.

Fulmer CA Gelfand MJ . At what level (and in whom) we trust: trust across multiple organizational levels. J Manage. 2012;38(4):1167–1230.

Marks MA Mathieu JE Zaccaro SJ . A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(3):356–376.

LePine JA Piccolo RF Jackson CL Mathieu JE Saul JR . A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Pers Psychol. 2008;61(2):273–307.

Salas E Shuffler ML Thayer AL Bedwell WL Lazzara EH . Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: a scientifically based practical guide. Hum Resour Manag. 2015;54(4):599–622.

Bowers CA Jentsch F Salas E Braun CC . Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Hum Factors. 1998;40(4):672–679.

Marlow SL Lacerenza CN Paoletti J Burke CS Salas E . Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2018;144:145–170.

Mesmer-Magnus JR DeChurch LA . Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):535–546.

DeChurch LA Mesmer-Magnus JR Doty D . Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: toward a process-state perspective. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;98(4):559–578.

Burke CS Stagl KC Klein C Goodwin GF Salas E Halpin SM . What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadersh Q. 2006;17(3):288–307.

Wang D Waldman DA Zhang Z . A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(2):181–198.

Mesmer-Magnus JR DeChurch LA Jimenez-Rodriguez M Wildman J Shuffler M . A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2011;115(2):214–225.

Casey-Campbell M Martens ML . Sticking it all together: a critical assessment of the group cohesion–performance literature. Int J Manag Rev. 2009;11:223–246.

Konradt U Otte KP Schippers MC Steenfatt C . Reflexivity in teams: a review and new perspectives. J Psychol. 2016;150(2):153–174.

Keiser NL Arthur W Jr . A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2020.

Widmer PS Schippers MC West MA . Recent developments in reflexivity research: a review. Psychol Ever Acti. 2009;2(2):2–11.

Kirkman BL Rosen B Gibson CB Tesluk PE McPherson SO . Five challenges to virtual team success: lessons from Sabre, Inc. Acad Manage Rev. 2002;16(3):67–79.

Grossman R Feitosa J . Team trust over time: modeling reciprocal and contextual influences in action teams. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2018;28(4):395–410.