Healthy food incentive program implementation targeting people receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits is supported by the federal Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive (FINI) grant program. This study examined factors contributing to increased SNAP use at farmers’ markets with an FINI-funded incentive program.
Design:
Implementation evaluation.
Setting:
Sixteen states and District of Columbia.
Participants:
Two hundred eighty-two FINI-funded farmers’ markets open in 2016.
Measures:
Weekly SNAP sales and transactions per 1000 SNAP households in the Zip Code Tabulation Areas around markets.
Analysis:
Two-level hierarchical regression modeling.
Results:
Most farmers’ markets (53%) had less than 100 SNAP transactions in 2016. Weekly SNAP sales and transactions per 1000 SNAP households were 69.9% and 47.7% higher, respectively, if more than 1 incentive was available versus 1. Not having paid market staff resulted in declines in these sales (−34.3%) and transactions (−38.1%) compared to markets with paid staff. There was a 6.2% and 5.1% increase in SNAP sales and transactions for each additional produce vendor. Weekly SNAP sales and transactions were about 2 to 3 times higher in rural areas compared to metropolitan. Clustering of markets within states explained 10% of the variation in weekly SNAP sales and transactions.
Conclusion:
Four implementation factors were identified that may facilitate the reach of SNAP-based monetary incentive programs at farmers’ markets to maximize reach and impact among SNAP shoppers.
DarmonNDrewnowskiA. Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(10):643–660. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv027.
2.
RehmCDMonsivaisPDrewnowskiA. Relation between diet cost and healthy eating index 2010 scores among adults in the United States, 2007–2010. Prev Med (Baltim). 2015;73:70–75. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.019.
3.
DanielC. Economic constraints on taste formation and the true cost of healthy eating. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:34–41. doi:10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2015.11.025.
4.
DutkoPVer PloegMFarriganT. Characteristics and Influential Factors of Food Deserts. In: ServiceER, ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2012.
5.
AggarwalAMonsivaisPDrewnowskiA. Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037533.
6.
Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: FY16 Through FY19 National View Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2019.
7.
HizaHABCasavaleKOGuentherPMDavisCA. Diet quality of americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(2):297–306. doi:10.1016/J.JAND.2012.08.011.
8.
WangDDLeungCWLiYet al.Trends in dietary quality among adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(10):1587–1595. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3422.
9.
LeungCWDingELCatalanoPJVillamorERimmEBWillettWC. Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the supplemental nutrition assistance program 1–3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(5):977–988. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.040014.INTRODUCTION.
10.
GuentherPMJuanWYLinoMLucasR. Diet Quality of Low-Income and Higher Income Americans in 2003-04 as Measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2008.
11.
StoreyMAndersonP. Income and race/ethnicity influence dietary fiber intake and vegetable consumption. Nutr Res. 2014;34(10):844–850. doi:10.1016/J.NUTRES.2014.08.016
12.
DrewnowskiADarmonNBriendA. Replacing fats and sweets with vegetables and fruits—a question of cost. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1555–1559. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1555.
13.
DrewnowskiA. The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1181–1188. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29300.
14.
AfshinAPeñalvoJLDel GobboLet al.The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172277. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172277.
15.
Pearson-StuttardJBandoszPRehmCDet al.Reducing US cardiovascular disease burden and disparities through national and targeted dietary policies: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(6):e1002311. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002311.
16.
ChoiSESeligmanHKBasuS. Cost effectiveness of subsidizing fruit and vegetable purchases through the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):e147–e155.
FreedmanDAVaudrinNSchneiderCet al.Systematic review of factors influencing farmers’ market use overall and among low-income populations. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(7):1136–1155. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2016.02.010.
19.
FreedmanDAFlockeSShonEJet al.Farmers’ market use patterns among supplemental nutrition assistance program recipients with high access to farmers’ markets. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017;49(5):397–404. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2017.01.007.
20.
StewartHDongD. The Relationship between Patronizing Direct-to-Consumer Outlets and a Household’s Demand for Fruits and Vegetables. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2018.
21.
FreedmanDAChoiSKHurleyTAnaduEHébertJR. A farmers’ market at a federally qualified health center improves fruit and vegetable intake among low-income diabetics. Prev Med (Baltim). 2013;56(5):288–292. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.018.
22.
CohenAJLachanceLLRichardsonCRet al.“Doubling Up” on produce at Detroit farmers markets: patterns and correlates of use of a healthy food incentive. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(2):181–189.
23.
LindsaySLambertJPennTet al.Monetary matched incentives to encourage the purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables at farmers markets in underserved communities. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E188–E188. doi:10.5888/pcd10.130124.
24.
FreedmanDAHuntARMerrittKShonEJPikeSN. Dissemination of technology to evaluate healthy food incentive programs. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(3). doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.036.
Lee-KwanSHMooreLVBlanckHMHarrisDMGaluskaD. Disparities in state-specific adult fruit and vegetable consumption – United States, 2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(45):1241–1247.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State Indicator Report on Fruits and Vegetables. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
32.
BellBAEneMSmileyWSchoenebergerJA. A multilevel model primer using SAS® PROC MIXED. In: SAS Global Forum 2013; 2013.
33.
ParkSLakeET. Multilevel modeling of a clustered continuous outcome: nurses’ work hours and burnout. Nurs Res. 2005;54(6):406–413. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16317362. Accessed April 10, 2018.
OlshoLEWKlermanJABartlettSHLoganCW. Rebates to Incentivize healthy nutrition choices in the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(2S2):S161–S170. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.023.
36.
PatschAJSmithJHLiebertMLBehrensTKCharlesT. Improving healthy eating and the bottom line: impact of a price incentive program in 2 hospital cafeterias. Am J Heal Promot. 2016;30(6):425–432. doi:10.1177/0890117116658237.
37.
CavanaghMJurkowskiJBozlakCHastingsJKleinA. Veggie Rx: an outcome evaluation of a healthy food incentive programme. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(14):2636–2641. doi:10.1017/S1368980016002081.
38.
BaronbergSDunnLNonasCDanneferRSacksR. The Impact of New York City’s Health bucks program on electronic benefit transfer spending at farmers markets, 2006–2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10(E166). doi:10.5888/pcd10.130113.
39.
YoungCRAquilanteJLSolomonSet al.Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: philly food bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:120356. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120356.
40.
LeungCWMusicusAAWillettWCRimmEB. Improving the nutritional impact of the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(2):S193–S198. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.024.
41.
KellegrewKPowersAStruemplerBet al.Evaluating barriers to SNAP/EBT acceptance in farmers markets: a survey of farmers. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2018;8(81):133–146. doi:10.5304/jafscd.2018.081.010.
42.
AliaKFreedmanDBrandtHBrowneT. Identifying emergent social networks at a federally qualified health center-based farmers’ market. Am J Community Psychol. 2014;53(3/4):335–345.
43.
KahnemanD.Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(5):1449–1475.
44.
115th U.S Congress. Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018. 2018.
